Posted on 12/08/2004 10:14:16 AM PST by gidget7
Sen. Kennedy Says Opponents of Gay Marriage Are Bigots Sen. Edward Kennedy has told A.P. that opponents of gay marriage are bigots. The news service reported last week: Meanwhile, Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy criticized supporters of a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, saying that would be a civil rights setback. Kennedy said bigotry should not be written into the federal constitution, and constitutional amendments should be about expanding rights and liberties.
Unitarians Confirm Our Forecast that Group Sex Will be Next The Unitarian Church is now welcoming those who believe in group relationships including the practice of romantic love. When we forecast last year that group sex, both heterosexual and homosexual, would quickly follow gay marriage, we were ridiculed. The full text of the Unitarian statement is linked here.
(Excerpt) Read more at massnews.com ...
Tolerance is the last virtue of a DYING soceity.
THEY WOULD CALL THEM HOME BIBLE STUDES WITH AMUSEMENTS ON THE SIDE.........HA, HA,..........
Reminds me of the old saying that 'those who believe in nothing, will fall for anything.' Sounds like a truth in this case.
Like a sailboat adrift with no sail, keel or rudder in the doldrums.
No no.
'Expanding rights' is the leftists equivalent of 'giving you rights' under the Constitution.
Not in protecting the rights the Constitution says you already have.
In other words, more 'social' rights from the 'living document' theorists.
And if you believe that you belief Sen. Edward Kennedy is a Catholic...
"Is this organization the main Unitarian church or a fringe group?"
Fringe group: Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness
http://www.uupa.net
"We are an independent "Related Organization" and as such are not a member of the Unitarian Universalist Association, or approved by the UUA Board of Trustees."
Here is the official UU site:
http://www.uua.org/
Wow. How bad do you have to be to be a "fringe Unitarian"?
New England is and has always been a fever swamp of all kinds of cultural leftism. Europe, often ridiculed by Freepers as a leftist mecca, has nothing on the self-righteous descendants of the Puritans when it comes to culture-destroying leftism.
"Tolerance is the last virtue of a DYING soceity."
And intolerant societies last forever? Are you implying that tolerance is the cause?
So will unitarians have weekly services or orgies?
If they believe in nothing are they a religion? or are they just another sex club?
What some people will do for a tax status.
Damn!!! One wife is tough enough to keep in line. How can anyone do it with 2, 3, 15, 40, or more?!?
And the cat fights... Whoa!!! It's gonna be scratch and claw like you've never seen before!
Is Bill Clinton one of these Unitarian Universalist Association people? Hitlary and Monica as his wives?
I still don't understand the religious objection to polygamy among consenting adults...it's all through the bible...
Re: http://www.cbn.com/CBNNews/CWN/073004plymouth.asp
Article says, "Marshall said, "Well, one of the major landmarks, of course, would be [the year] 1800. Because you've got the First Great Awakening that swept through all of the 13 colonies on the Atlantic seaboard. [During it] people came to Christ by the hundreds of thousands, and it actually created the War for Independence.'"
Did you hear about the hate crime at the Unitarian Church? Out on the front lawn they found a burning question mark.
I just had to ping you. Why? Because when I first saw the title, I thought it said, "Uniformitarians Confirm Our Forecast that Group Sex Will be Next". It didn't strike me as odd because I just figured it was the latest fossil/evolution theory to be spun out of the "geological column". ;-)
The anarchist do have a standard logo (the 'A' with a circle around it).
Hosea Ballou 2d was only one of many involved. The University is named after Charles Tufts, who provided the land grant. It was indeed formed through money raised by the Universalist church, and under the guidance of a committee of luminaries formed for the task (mainly because of marginalization, even suppression, of UU viewpoints at Harvard, which was then more aligned with the Episcopalian Church). It's seems quaint now, but back then (1840s and 1850s) the top Universities in our country generally required graduates to speak Latin and deliver senior and master's theses in Latin, as well as receive education in specific approaches to Christian doctrine. The Universalists thus felt the need to establish their own university to compete with Harvard.
The UU faith back then is significantly different from what passes for UU "doctrine" today. The UUs are suffering from the same radicalism and factionalism from within its ranks that is afflicting Episcopalian, Methodist, and a few other mainstream churches.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.