Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ouch! - this is awfully awesomely good!
1 posted on 12/07/2004 8:18:31 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CHARLITE

BTTT


2 posted on 12/07/2004 8:20:54 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Ping.


4 posted on 12/07/2004 8:25:20 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Site MeterWOW...see also http://hillarywatch.blogspot.com
6 posted on 12/07/2004 8:29:51 PM PST by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Hillary is of course a phony, but as her husband proved, sometimes it is enough to simply talk conservative.

Hillary can lay some claim to the federal Defense of Marriage Act that passed Congress overwhelmingly in 1996 and was signed into law by her husband. She will play the disingenuous Dem/Left card that says she personally opposes gay marriage, but doesn't support a Federal Amendment because she thinks it enshrines discrimination into the Constitution (odd reason this is, since it basically means that her alleged 'personal' position is discrimanatory) and because she supports states rights (an apparent first for liberals) to handle the matter. This is of course nothing but a cynical attempt to bide time until the Courts do for the Left what they can't do in a fair democratic, legislative fight. I don't think anyone in their right mind thinks that a President or Senator Hillary would lift a finger to fight such a ruling.

Then there is the military: Hillary has called for increasing the Army by two divisions, and the fact is that we may need such an increase. Sure, for Hillary this is nothing but an attempt to infuse her persona with some masculine, tough, pro-military credentials to counter what would be fears many would have about turning over the role of Commander in Chief to such a woman as Hillary in a time of war. But that doesn't mean the idea itself is a bad one. The GOP should consider doing this in the next couple of years so that she can't make an issue of it.

Then there is immigration: Of course she would never do anything serious about illegal immigration. Why would she or any Dem try and reduce the supply of future Dem voters? But considering how awful Bush and the GOP leadership are on immigration in both policy and their inane, platitude-ridden rhetoric, Hillary could very well sound like a breath of fresh air to many who are tired of having their views on this ignored. And she would have one powerful advantage over any Republican who decided to talk tough on this matter -- and that is that the leftwing, ethnic interest groups would not attack her with the same zeal they would a conservative, if they would attack her at all (I'm sure they could be persuaded to keep their mouths shut). But more importantly, even if she was attacked by these nut groups, the mainstream media would not echo and give credence to them as they would to attacks on a conservative. Can anyone imagine Katie Couric or Matt Lauer implying that Hillary is "anti-immigrant" or "anti-immigration" or "anti-hispanice" as they would a Republican candidate? Of course not. Who knows, the press might even discover that there is another side to the immigration issue if Hillary takes it up.

We should not take the Hillary threat lightly. If Iraq is not stabilized, then the country may be willing to swallow her center-right charade long enought to elect her.


7 posted on 12/07/2004 8:35:15 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Greenburg is always on target when it comes to the Clintons.

Not withstanding the appeal of the Clintons in some circles, they have become relics of a past we will be foolish to repeat.

This should be the message.

Their failures.

Our achievements.

Oh, have you noticed the demonization of Condi Rice?

Pure Clinton.

8 posted on 12/07/2004 8:38:23 PM PST by smoothsailing (Eagles Up !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Excellent read, but vote for Hillary? No bleepin' way. I'd sooner vote for Nader.


10 posted on 12/07/2004 8:50:45 PM PST by Theresawithanh (Snappy, witty, humerous tagline needed! Will pay in Marlboro Miles...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
scoff, conservatives, you could wind up voting for her if the GOP, grown fat and sassy, fails to nominate a strong candidate in '08

NO WAY...I would even vote for stinky McCain over her....albeit holding my nose all the way.

12 posted on 12/07/2004 8:54:41 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

13 posted on 12/07/2004 9:20:52 PM PST by Tuba Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I would never under any circumstances vote for Hillary!!!!!


14 posted on 12/07/2004 10:40:48 PM PST by Proud Conservative2 (We have to be held accountable for our actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

"good"

Good grief! What's new .. Hillary morphing into whatever she believes her lackeys will buy has been her style for years. I guess the author didn't notice that Hillary been playing the centrist for a few years now. YAWN!


15 posted on 12/07/2004 11:07:24 PM PST by CyberAnt (Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE; MeekOneGOP; Smartass; Prime Choice

16 posted on 12/07/2004 11:09:35 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

...anyone that doubts Hitlery will be the '08 nominee isn't paying attention...

This winter, we really need to nail down a couple of quality Conservative Americans that want to run and can run a solid center/right-America-first campaign...


17 posted on 12/07/2004 11:10:54 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a death cult that must end. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
if the GOP, grown fat and sassy, fails to nominate a strong candidate in '08...

If they nominate a RINO like Giuliani, McCain or similar, expect a repeat of the 1992 debacle.

18 posted on 12/07/2004 11:16:37 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Never, and I repeat NEVER will I vote for her. I don't find the subject of Hillary amusing as I believe she is an evil corrupt Marxist, who should be behind bars.
19 posted on 12/07/2004 11:17:17 PM PST by ladyinred (Congratulations President Bush! Four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Personally, I think Hillary's chances in 2008 are way overrated. Could you imagine what a massacre that would be? O_o

Look for a threat from someone who is kinda normal, like Phil Bredesen from TN, or that Ken Salazar guy in CO.


22 posted on 12/08/2004 2:03:23 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE; All
     



-Hillary Clinton- archives, comments, and opposition research --

-The Clinton Files--

-Murder, Inc. [repost] --

-ATTENTION BLOODHOUNDS--

-Women in the Clinton Era: Abuse,Intimidation and Smears--

Hillary's delegates spit on and taunt Police Honor Guard at her Convention

Catastrophic intelligence Failure - Clinton's Bin Laden GATE

CIA Officials Reveal What Went Wrong – Clinton to Blame

DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON
 

And yes, that picture is the one of Hill kissing Suha Arafat ( "wife" of The Littlest Terrorist ) after Suha had accused the Israelis of poisoning Palestinian children...

23 posted on 12/08/2004 2:07:57 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson