Posted on 12/07/2004 7:15:28 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
Edited on 12/07/2004 9:35:07 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
U.S. military intelligence has concluded the Iraqi insurgency is being directed to a greater degree than previously thought from Syria, where former Saddam Hussein loyalists have found sanctuary and are channeling money, other support, the WASHINGTON POST will report in Wednesday editions... DEVELOPING...
Link to Article and EXCERPT:
Rebels Aided By Sources in Syria, U.S. Says
Rebels Aided By Sources in Syria, U.S. Says
Baathists Reportedly Relay Money, Support
U.S. military intelligence officials have concluded that the Iraqi insurgency is being directed to a greater degree than previously recognized from Syria, where they said former Saddam Hussein loyalists have found sanctuary and are channeling money and other support to those fighting the established government.
Based on information gathered during the recent fighting in Fallujah, Baghdad and elsewhere in the Sunni Triangle, the officials said that a handful of senior Iraqi Baathists operating in Syria are collecting money from private sources in Saudi Arabia and Europe and turning it over to the insurgency.
In some cases, evidence suggests that these Baathists are managing operations in Iraq from a distance, the officials said. A U.S. military summary of operations in Fallujah noted recently that troops discovered a global positioning signal receiver in a bomb factory in the western part of the city that "contained waypoints originating in western Syria."
Concerns about Syria's role in Iraq were also expressed in interviews The Washington Post conducted yesterday with Jordan's King Abdullah and Iraqi President Ghazi Yawar. "There are people in Syria who are bad guys, who are fugitives of the law and who are Saddam remnants who are trying to bring the vicious dictatorship of Saddam back," Yawar said. "They are not minding their business or living a private life. They are . . . disturbing or undermining our political process."...."
Glad I could help
Hey! GREAT IDEA! Let's subcontract the invasion of Syria to the Israelis. We could let it out to them on a "cost plus" basis. We could even offer to supply the ammo.
This would make the Israelis happy on several levels, while sparing our own troops.
The Iranian army would have to cross Iraq to aid the Syrians. And I think that they would not be so eager to face our smart bombs.
Oh! Well, that's what I would do if I was in the "Cat Bird" seat. I see this war going on forever if we don't act to put an end to it.
The bad guy's out there want what Sadam had, they think that Iraq's oil wealth is up for grabs. If they could only get us to cut and run again. Like we did in Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia, etc.
If the UN doesn't condemn, they will be putting another nail in their own coffin.
WANTED: Master Carpenter. Must be familiar with coffin construction and possess stouter right arm than previous carpentry staff. Apply in person at 1 UN Plaza, ask for Kofi.
Bump for later read.
Same name, but they had a rivalry going. Each side thought they were the true Ba'athists while the others were just idiots.
I'd pin Syrian support for the terrorists on the simple fact that they support terrorists. I don't think there's a Saddam-Bashar brotherhood thing going on.
if Iraq declared war on Syria...
Maybe after the Iraq elections as part of the non-civil war against the Sunni insurgents/terrorists.
The President won't waste his time going to Congress or the UN again.
Don't need to do either to protect our forces in Iraq. Besides, we have the recent precedent of the French in the Ivory Coast.
Sure, we'll use those two of the four Infantry and one of the three Armored Divisions we have in reserve.
They did that, and the EU/UN had no backbone...of course!
Plus they have no real military capability to back up their words. Iran is playing with them and laughing at them behind their back. The EU/UN are pathetic.
----------------------------------
Four questions:
1. Where will we get the multiple divisions needed to do this?
2. Taking Iraq was not the problem, controlling Iraq is. What would make Syria different? And, what units do we use to occupy it?
3. How do you keep Israel from being pulled in? Don't fool yourself into thinking this would be a good thing.
4. Look west and invade Syria, what do we do then when Iran opens an Eastern front?
Got any answers?
Syria retained in control of some 125 square kilometers (48 square miles) of Jordanian territory, which it holds to this day, and in which some 17,000 Syrians have been resettled... Some 20,000 Syrian settlers now occupy the site under the protection of Syrian soldiers and police... Syrias justification for keeping the land is that some 20,000 Syrians currently live there. This is almost the exact same number of Israelis living on the Golan. Golan "linkage" is the last thing Syria needs as tensions with Jordan heat up.The difference is, Syria used the Golan to shell Israeli towns and farms, and did so after Israel gave it back the first time. Syria can go **** itself, it isn't getting back the Golan Hts.
You can bet that we have numerous SF teams in both countries working the fringes, probably more so in Iran than Syria.
Getting tips and training no doubt...
Do we even have the military manpower to invade Syria as well?
You could pull some out of Iraq. With Syria eliminated the control problem in Iraq will be greatly reduced, because you've cut off the head of the snake. Or at least one of the heads.
"2. Taking Iraq was not the problem, controlling Iraq is. What would make Syria different? And, what units do we use to occupy it?
Controlling Iraq has only been a problem because Syria and Iran are working against us. There would not be that much internal opposition without external influence.
3. How do you keep Israel from being pulled in? Don't fool yourself into thinking this would be a good thing.
How did we keep Israel out of it with Iraq? Saddam swore to bring Israel into it and tried his best. "4. Look west and invade Syria, what do we do then when Iran opens an Eastern front?"
If Iran wants to open an eastern front and provide us more targets they can. Wiping out an army that is moving across the desert is a lot easier than driving terrorists out of a city.
LOL. The sky is falling!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.