Posted on 12/06/2004 9:25:04 PM PST by Moonman62
Good evening. I want to have a frank talk with you tonight about our most serious domestic problem. That problem is inflation. Inflation can threaten all the economic gains we've made, and it can stand in the way of what we want to achieve in the future.
This has been a long-time threat. For the last 10 years, the annual inflation rate in the United States has averaged 6-1/2 percent. And during the 3 years before my inauguration, it had increased to an average of eight percent.
Inflation has, therefore, been a serious problem for me ever since I became president. We've tried to control it, but we have not been successful. It's time for all of us to make a greater and more coordinated effort.
If inflation gets worse, several things will happen. Your purchasing power will continue to decline, and most of the burden will fall on those who can least afford it. Our national productivity will suffer. The value of our dollar will continue to fall in world trade.
We've made good progress in putting our people back to work over the past 21 months. We've created more than six million new jobs for American workers. We've reduced the unemployment rate by about 25 percent, and we will continue our efforts to reduce unemployment further, especially among our young people and minorities.
But I must tell you tonight that inflation threatens this progress. If we do not get inflation under control, we will not be able to reduce unemployment further, and we may even slide backward.
Inflation is obviously a serious problem. What is the solution?
I do not have all the answers. Nobody does. Perhaps there is no complete and adequate answer. But I want to let you know that fighting inflation will be a central preoccupation of mine during the months ahead, and I want to arouse the nation to join me in this effort.
There are two simplistic and familiar answers which are sometimes proposed -- simple, familiar, and too extreme. One of these answers is to impose a complicated scheme of Federal government wage and price controls on our entire free economic system. The other is a deliberate recession which would throw millions of people out of work. Both of these extreme proposals would not work, and they must be rejected.
I've spent many hours in the last few months reviewing with my own advisers and with a number of outside experts every proposal, every suggestion, every possibility in eliminating inflation. If there's one thing I have learned beyond any doubt, it is that there is no single solution for inflation.
What we have, instead, is a number of partial remedies. Some of them will help; others may not. But we have no choice but to use the best approaches we have and to maintain a constant search for additional steps which may be effective.
I want to discuss with you tonight some of the approaches we have been able to develop. They involve action by government, business, labor, and every other sector of our economy. Some of these factors are under my control as president -- especially government actions -- and I will insist that the government does its part of the job.
But whether our efforts are successful with finally depend on you as much as on me. Your decisions -- made every day at your service station or your grocery store, in your business, in your union meetings -- will determine our nation's answer to inflation as much as decisions make here at the White House or by the Congress on Capitol Hill.
I cannot guarantee that our joint effort will succeed. In fact, it is almost certain not to succeed if success means quick or dramatic changes. Every free government on Earth is wrestling with this problem of inflation, and every one of them knows that a long-term disease required long-term treatment. It's up to us to make the improvements we can, even at the risk of partial failure, rather than to ensure failure by not trying at all.
I will concentrate my efforts within the government. We know that government is not the only cause of inflation. But it is one of the causes, and government does set an example. Therefore, it must take the lead in fiscal restraint.
We are going to hold down government spending, reduce the budget deficit, and eliminate government waste.
We will slash Federal hiring and cut the Federal work force.
We will eliminate needless regulations.
We will bring more competition back to our economy.
And we will oppose any further reduction in Federal income taxes until we have convincing prospects that inflation will be controlled.
Let me explain what each one of these steps means.
The Federal deficit is too high. Our people are simply sick and tired of wasteful Federal spending and the inflation it brings with it.
We have already had some success. We've brought the deficit down by one-third since I ran for president -- from more than $66 billion in fiscal year 1976 to about $40 billion in fiscal year 1979 -- a reduction of more than $25 billion in the Federal deficit in just 3 years.
I will keep going down. Next year, with tough restraints on Federal spending and moderate economic growth in prospect, I plan to reduce the budget deficit to less than one-half what it was when I ran for office -- to $30 billion or less.
The government has been spending too great a portion of what our nation produces. During my campaign I promised to cut the government's share of our total national spending from 23 percent, which it was then, to 21 percent in fiscal year 1981. We now plan to meet that goal one year earlier.
Reducing the deficit will require difficult and unpleasant decisions. We must face a time of national austerity. Hard choices are necessary if we want to avoid consequences that are even worse.
I intend to make those hard choices. I have already vetoed bills that would undermine our fight against inflation, and the Congress has sustained those vetoes. I know that the Congress will continue to cooperate in the effort to meet our needs in responsible, noninflationary ways.
I will use the administrative and the budgetary powers of my office, including the veto, if necessary, to keep our nation firmly on the path of fiscal restraint.
Restraint involves tax policy as well as spending decisions. Tax reduction has never been more politically popular than it is today. But if future tax cuts are made rashly, with no eye on the budge deficits, they will hurt us all by causing more inflation.
There are tax cuts which could directly lower costs and prices and help in the fight against inflation. I may consider ways to reduce those particular taxes while still cutting the budget deficit, but until we have a convincing prospect of controlling inflation, I will oppose any further reductions in Federal income taxes.
To keep the government to a manageable size, I'm ordering tonight a cut in Federal hiring. This order will mean a reduction of more than 20,000 in the number of permanent Federal employees already budgeted for this fiscal year and will cut the total size of the Federal work force.
I've already placed a 5-1/2-percent cap on the pay increase for Federal employees, and Federal executive officers are receiving no pay increases at all.
It's not enough just to control government deficits, spending, and hiring. We must also control the costs of government regulations.
In recent years, Congress has passed a number of landmark statutes to improve social and environmental conditions. We must and we will continue progress toward protecting the health and safety of the American people. But we must also realize that everything has a price and that consumers eventually pick up the tab. Where regulations are essential, they must be efficient. Where they fight inflation, they should be encouraged. Where they are unnecessary, they should be removed.
Early this year, I directed Federal agencies to eliminate unnecessary regulations and to analyze the costs and benefits of new ones. Today, for instance, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, sometimes called OSHA, eliminated nearly 1,000 unnecessary regulations.
Now, we can build on this progress. I've directed a council of my regulatory departments and agencies to coordinate their regulations, to prevent overlapping and duplication. Most important, the council will develop a unified calendar of planned major regulations. The calendar will give us, for the first time, a comprehensive list of regulations the Federal government is proposing, with their costs and objectives.
As president, I will personally use my authority to ensure that regulations are issued only when needed and that they meet their goals at the lowest possible cost.
We are also cutting away the regulatory thicket that has grown up around us and giving our competitive free enterprise system a chance to grow up in its place.
Last year we gave the airline industry a fresh shot of competition. Regulations were removed. Free market forces drove prices down, record numbers of passengers traveled, and profits went up. Our new airline deregulation bill will make these benefits permanent. For the first time in decades, we have actually deregulated a major industry.
Next year we will work with Congress to bring more competition to others, such as the railroad and trucking industries.
Of all our weapons against inflation, competition is the most powerful. Without real competition, prices and wages go up, even when demand is going down. We must therefore work to allow more competition wherever possible so that powerful groups -- government, business, labor -- must think twice before abusing their economic power. We will redouble our efforts to put competition back into the American free enterprise system.
Another reason for inflation is the slow-down in productivity growth. More efficient production is essential if we are to control inflation, make American goods more competitive in world markets, add new jobs, and increase the real incomes of our people.
We've made a start toward improving productivity. The tax bill just passed by the Congress includes many of the investment incentives that I recommended last January. Federal support for research and development will continue to increase especially, for basic research. We will coordinate and strengthen Federal programs that support productivity improvements throughout our economy.
Our government efforts will attack the inflation that hurts most, inflation in the essentials -- food, housing, and medical care.
We will continue to use our agricultural policies to sustain farm production, to maintain stable prices, and to keep inflation down.
Rising interest rates have always accompanied inflation. They add further to the costs of business expansion and to what consumers must pay when they buy houses and other consumer items.
The burden of controlling inflation cannot be left to monetary policy alone, which must deal with the problem through tight restrictions on money and credit that push interest rates up. I will work for balanced, concerted, and sustained program under which tight budget restraint, private wage and price moderation, and responsible monetary policy support each other. If successful, we should expect lower inflation and lower interest rates for consumers and businesses alike.
As for medical care, where costs have gone up much faster than the general inflation rate, the most important step we can take is to pass a strong bill to control hospital costs. This year the Senate passed one. Next year I will try again, and I believe the whole Congress will act to hold down hospital costs -- if your own members of Congress hear from you.
Between now and January, when the new Congress convenes, I will be preparing a package of specific legislative proposals to help fight inflation.
The government will do its part, but in a country like ours, government cannot do the job alone. In the end, the success or failure of this effort will also rest on whether the private sector will accept -- and act on -- the voluntary wage and price standards I am announcing tonight.
These standards are fair. They are standards that everyone can follow. If we do follow them, they will slow prices down so that wages will not have to chase prices just to stay even. And they point the way toward an eventual cure for inflation, by removing the pressures that cause it in the first place.
In the last ten years, in our attempts to protect ourselves from inflation, we've developed attitudes and habits that actually keep inflation going once it has begun. Most companies raise their prices because they expect costs to rise. Unions call for large wage settlements because they expect it to happen, it does happen; and once it's started, wages and prices chase each other up and up. It's like a crowd standing at a football stadium. No one can see any better than when everyone is sitting down, but no one is willing to be the first to sit down.
Except for our lowest paid workers, I'm asking all employees in this country to limit total wage increases to a maximum of seven percent per year. From tonight on, every contract signed and every pay raise granted should meet this standard.
My price limitation will be equally strict. Our basic target for economy-wide price increases is 5-3/4 percent. To reach this goal, I'm tonight setting a standard for each firm in the nation to hold its price increases at least one-half of one percentage point below what they averaged during 1976 and 1977.
Of course, we have to take into account binding commitments already in effect, which will prevent an absolute adherence to these standards. But this price standard is much lower than this year's inflation rate, and more important, it's less than the standard for wage increases. That difference is accounted for by rising productivity, and it will allow the income of America's workers to stay ahead of inflation.
This is a standard for everyone to follow -- everyone. As far as I'm concerned, every business, every union, every professional group, every individual in this country has no excuse not to adhere to these standards. If we meet these standards, the real buying power of your paycheck will rise.
The difficulty with a voluntary program is that workers fear that if they cooperate with the standards while others do not, then they will suffer if inflation continues.
To deal with this concern, I will ask the Congress next January to enact a program that workers who observe the standards would be eligible for a tax rebate if the inflation rate is more than 7 percent. In other words, they would have a real wage insurance policy against inflation which might be caused by others. This will give our workers an additional incentive to observe the program and will remove their only legitimate reason not to cooperate.
Because this is not a mandatory control plan, I cannot stop an irresponsible corporation from rising its prices or a selfish group of employees from using its power to demand excessive wages. But then if that happens, the government will respond, using the tools of government authority and public opinion.
Soon after they raise prices or demand pay increases that are excessive, the company or the union will feel the pressure that the public can exert, through new competition to drive prices down or removal of government protection and privileges which they now enjoy.
We will also make better use of the $80 billion worth of purchases the government makes from private industry each year. We must be prudent buyers. If costs rise too fast, we can delay those purchases, as your family would, or switch to another supplier. We may not buy a fleet of cars this year, for example, if cars cost too much, or we may channel our purchases to suppliers who have observed our wage and price standards rather than to buy from those who have not.
We will require firms that supply goods and services the government to certify their compliance with the wage and price standards. We will make every effort, within legal limits, to deny government contracts to companies that fail to meet our wage and price standards. We will use our buying power more effectively to make price restraint and competition a reality.
The government now extends... [several words of text missing] ...many parts of the private economy -- special franchises, protected wages and prices, subsidies, protection from foreign competition. If wages or prices rise too fast in some industry, we will take that as a sign that those privileges are removed. We will make sure that no part of our economy is able to use its special privilege or its concentrated power to victimize the rest of us.
This approach I've outlined will not end inflation. It simply improves our chances of making it better rather than worse. To summarize the plan I'm announcing tonight:
We will cut the budget deficit.
We will slash Federal hiring and reduce the Federal work force.
We will restrain Federal pay.
We will delay further tax cuts.
We will use Federal policy to encourage more competition.
We will set specific standards for both wages and prices throughout the economy.
We will use the powers at our disposal to make this program work.
And we will submit new anti-inflation proposals to the Congress next January, including the real wage insurance proposal I've discussed tonight.
I've said many times that these steps will be tough -- and they are. But I also said they will be fair -- and they are. They apply equally to all groups. They give all of us an equal chance to move ahead.
And these proposals, which give us a chance, also deserve a chance. If, tomorrow or next week or next month, you ridicule them, ignore them, pick them apart before they have a chance to work, then you will have reduced their chance of succeeding.
These steps can work, but that will take time, and you are the ones who can give them that time. If there's one thing I'm asking of every American tonight, it is to give this plan a chance to work -- a chance to work for us.
You can help give it that chance by using your influence. Business and labor must know that you will not tolerate irresponsible price and wage increases. Your elected officials must know how you feel as they make difficult choices.
Too often the only voices they hear are those of special interests, supporting their own narrow cause. If you want government officials to cut inflation, you have to make sure that they hear your voice. I have heard you with unmistakable clarity.
Nearly 40 years ago, when the world watched to see whether his nation would survive, Winston Churchill defied those who thought Britain would fall to the Nazi threat. Churchill replied by asking his countrymen, "What kind of people do they think we are?"
There are those today who say that a free economy cannot cope with inflation and that we've lost our ability to act as a nation rather than as a collection of special interests. And I reply, "What kind of people do they think we are?"
I believe that our people, our economic system, and our government are equal to this task. I hope that you will prove me right.
Thank you, and good night.
He didn't invent it, but he tilled the ground, planted it, watered it, nurtured it and harvesting a bumper crop.
Can you believe this walking vegetable still rears his ugly mug and tries to imply that he knows anything at all about what's good for this nation?
Jimma, your brother was obiviously the gifted one in the family.
Strange indeed. He seemed to be all over the place and talking out of both sides of his mouth. He doesn't believe in wage and price controls and then he asks for companies and unions to voluntarily self-impose them, in return for targeted tax cuts and regulatory relief. Bizarre.
History does give him credit for airline deregulation and PARTIAL credit for oil price deregulation.
Solution turned out to be simple: Dump Jimmy Carter; elect Ronald Reagan.
He also rambled on way too long and repeated himself multiple times. Anyone listening would have started out interested but would have turned to the Bob Newhart show before he was halfway through.
Since he was all over the place he was bound to be right on something.
Toward the end he says if you just give this enough time, it will work, implying that it's going to look and feel like a failure right out of the gate. Then he implies that if it does fail, it will be the fault of the American people, a common thread in his speeches.
I think he invented something coined "stagflation". The ONLY time in history we had inflation AND a stagnate economy all at the same time.
Red6
No Sh*t. Thanks.
If I hadn't been shaking my head back and forth, I think I would have passed out reading through it.
Anyone listening would have started out interested but would have turned to the Bob Newhart show before he was halfway through.
Who was the patient with the toupee on that show? He had all the excitement of a Carter speech.
-- from http://FreedomKeys.com/medicare.htm
"It is fascinating to watch politicians come up with 'solutions' to problems that are a direct result of their previous solutions. In many cases, the most efficient thing to do would be to repeal their previous solution and stop being so gung-ho for creating new solutions in the future. But, politically, that is the last thing they will do." -- Thomas Sowell
God, I remember those days. Dreary. It seemed the whole economy was going out of control, and this annoying little hemorrhoid in the White House was telling us we'd just have to learn to live with it--
"austerity" he called for--in America, during peacetime!
Having no clue, he tried the kitchen sink approach, and the misery index just got worse.
Fortunately the Fed tightened up money and Reagan brought leadership to the land. The inflation rate began to drop within months of his inauguration and has never really looked back.
I was in the Army, so I suppose I could be a bit biased.
Carter was in the Navy, Kerry was in the Navy, Kennedy was in the Navy.
What is it with liberals and squids?
If liberals wanted to be tough, they should have been Marines.
Instead, they are just a bunch of wimps.
Flame on, if you wish, consider this.
It is the Army and Marines who do MOST of the dirty work.
Thought you might want to read this per our previous conversation.
Carter went to on to implement credit controls which were disastrous. Volcker tightened money with Reagan's approval, and it caused a big recession, but I think it did more to restore confidence in the dollar than anything else. The biggest weapon that can be used against inflation is economic growth, and that depends on investment and innovation, which prospered under Reagan.
Another reason for inflation is the slow-down in productivity growth. More efficient production is essential if we are to control inflation, make American goods more competitive in world markets, add new jobs, and increase the real incomes of our people.
Carter almost had it right. However, when you pit existing corporations against each other the first thing they'll cut is their R&D budget, salaries, and investment, none of each help economic growth or fight inflation. You might get lower prices, but you can't build and economy around it.
The good type of competition comes from startups with new ideas.
"Carter went to on to implement credit controls which were disastrous"
That's right! I bought a house right about when he was giving this speech, October 1978, with a 10.5% mortgage. If that sounds egregious to our younger freepers, by a year later the prime rate was like 17 or 18% and I felt like I had a bargain.
As for real estate, as the saying went, "you couldn't move it with a bulldozer."
If I had some pixie dust, I would ride a moonbeam.
How pathetic. What an out-of-touch, over-his-head dingaling this man was.
-ccm
I do not have all the answers. Nobody does. Perhaps there is no complete and adequate answer.
Jimmy really knew how to get people confident in his programs.
Jimmy got some things right. I wouldn't call him an idiot. The problem was he did deficit reduction at the expense of tax cuts and economic growth. Not a good thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.