Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rule of Lawlessness: Mary Frances Berry won't go.
National Review Online ^ | December 06, 2004 | Peter Kirsanow

Posted on 12/06/2004 9:25:45 AM PST by xsysmgr

Mary Frances Berry's term as a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights ended at midnight Sunday, but as of this writing she maintains that her term doesn't end until January 21, 2005, and imperiously refuses to step down.

Her claim is nonsense. Her primary commission documents, signed by President Bill Clinton when he appointed her to her now-expired term, show that her term ended on December 5, 2004. If that alone wasn't enough, the Congressional Research Service issued an opinion to the House Oversight Committee to the same effect. Finally, the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals in U.S. ex rel. Kirsanow v. Wilson involving the specific issue of commissioner terms, uncontrovertibly instructs that her term ended Sunday.

Unimpressed, Berry clings to the seat she's held for almost 25 years, the last 12 as chairman. She's summarily cancelled this coming Friday's commission meeting in violation of federal regulations and over the strenuous objections of Republican commissioners. The action deflects a face-to-face confrontation between Berry and the newly appointed commissioners — at least momentarily.

None of this is particularly surprising to anyone who's followed the commission over the last dozen years. A culture of unaccountability has become an entrenched feature of the commission's administrative character. Numerous governmental reviews of the commission have concluded that the agency is wholly dysfunctional.

In 1997, a Government Accountability Office report noted that management is in disarray, projects are poorly managed and take years to complete, spending data isn't maintained by office, program, or function and the agency's policies and procedures are unclear. GAO couldn't even verify project spending because of the commission's indecipherable record keeping.

The Office of Personnel Management conducted two reviews of the commission in the 1990s. Yet despite evidence of pervasive management problems, the civil-rights commission failed to implement five of six substantive OPM recommendations.

The GAO's 2003 review of the commission showed that the commission had also failed to comply with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. The civil-rights commission has not updated its strategic plan since 1997.

Moreover, the commission has not had a full independent audit in at least 12 years. The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution is currently investigating the commission's finances, management, and contracting practices. Good luck. Many commissioners have found the agency to be financially inscrutable.

The commission that was once known as "the conscience of the nation" has become a theater of the absurd. Anyone reading a transcript of a commission meeting might well believe it was authored by Lewis G. Carroll. Berry habitually releases to the public statements, reports, and press releases (usually critical of Republicans or at least consistent with her positions) that have been voted down previously by the commission as a whole.

Just last week she released a deeply flawed and biased report critical of the Bush administration's civil-rights record, despite the fact that such report had been rejected by the commission at its November 12 meeting (the report was originally scheduled for release just days before the presidential election but Republican commissioners succeeded in tabling it, noting that the report on the Clinton civil-rights record wasn't released until after his second term, expressly to avoid politicization). Why even vote on reports if the chairman will simply issue them as she sees fit?

The commission's mounting problems have caused the chorus of those who contend that the agency has outlived its usefulness to become larger and louder. I don't agree with them. While it becomes increasingly difficult to defend the commission's usefulness, it could function as the nation's conscience if its deliberative processes were rational, open, and fair; its findings objective, unbiased, and unimpeachable; and its membership fully engaged in framing, shaping, and drafting its reports. As the Washington Post recently editorialized, "a serious, rigorous commission could create breathing space for creative civil rights dialogue unbeholden to the orthodoxies of either the left or the right."

By engaging an independent audit, implementing structural forms, and adopting sound GAO recommendations, the commission would be taking the first steps toward becoming the kind of agency described by the Washington Post. But not before Ms. Berry observes the rule of law and steps down.

Peter Kirsanow is a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: clintonholdovers; maryfrancesberry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: angkor

I agree -- she should be arrested for trespassing, and the charges should be fully prosecuted.


21 posted on 12/06/2004 9:41:10 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

I seem to remember Mary Frances Berry's name and extremely shadowed history mentioned prominently in "Shakedown" as an old friend of both Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton.

To say she's as bent as bobwire and as crooked as a dog's hind leg would be complete understatements.

Call the Capital Park Cops and give this bought and paid for Clinton political "Plantationist" the Bum's Rush out of the building.

Then shut the entire building down as the Commission is un-chartered and de-funded.

Jack.


22 posted on 12/06/2004 9:41:44 AM PST by Jack Deth (When In Doubt.... Empty The Magazine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges!"

Typical LiberalNazi: a loathesome power-mad tyrant with total disrespect of the law.

23 posted on 12/06/2004 9:42:17 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
You cannot let people dictate that they will not obey the law

This one's a special case. A couple years ago Berry had to be served with repeated court rulings to allow a new Republican commission member to take his seat.

24 posted on 12/06/2004 9:43:19 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mondonico

Riiiiight! Throw her ignorant ass out of her office. She wants a fight, give her one.


25 posted on 12/06/2004 9:43:28 AM PST by Big Digger (If you can keep your head when others are losing theirs, you must be a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

She has been there for 25 years. What's the big deal about one more month! Not worth the bad publicity of her being taken out in handcuffs ...


26 posted on 12/06/2004 9:44:50 AM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
How much does this POS make as Chairman of the Commission?
27 posted on 12/06/2004 9:44:52 AM PST by martinidon (Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out 100 plus million for nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Since the Commission will always be a vehicle for attacks on Republicans and a bully pulpit for the racial hucksters of the Left, it is in our interest that it be as big a circus as possible. Ms. Berry is helping us out in that regard...


28 posted on 12/06/2004 9:45:16 AM PST by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

It's like deja vu all over again.


29 posted on 12/06/2004 9:45:21 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smiley
....saw Mary Francis on C-Span several years ago...she is one hateful racist.....

What you talkin' bout, Willis?

30 posted on 12/06/2004 9:45:24 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro

So when did you go blind?


31 posted on 12/06/2004 9:47:29 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: angkor

"A couple years ago Berry had to be served with repeated court rulings to allow a new Republican commission member to take his seat."

She should have been thrown out then, just like she should be thrown out now!


32 posted on 12/06/2004 9:47:37 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004

That would involve political courage.


33 posted on 12/06/2004 9:47:39 AM PST by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
While it becomes increasingly difficult to defend the commission's usefulness, it could function as the nation's conscience if

If WHAT?

If the nation was an individual, and could have a conscience?

The nation cannot by definition have such a thing, we all have individual consciences, and mine is fine, thanks.

I don't need Mary Frances Berry-or even Peter Kirsanow-to sub for me.

34 posted on 12/06/2004 9:47:51 AM PST by Jim Noble (FR Iraq policy debate begins 11/3/04. Pass the word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

To be pragmatic, it's easier than anyone here has suggested.

All federal buildings in DC now have armed guards at the main entrances who check IDs and run the screening machines.

Whoever is her superior needs simply to inform the guards that Berry is no longer a federal employee, and that she's to be denied admittance to the building.

If she tries to break in, call the Capitol Police and have her arrested for trespassing.

It's that simple.


35 posted on 12/06/2004 9:48:46 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Another article, same topic, here.
36 posted on 12/06/2004 9:48:48 AM PST by upchuck (My "just in time" supply chain for taglines is busted. Come back tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"a serious, rigorous commission could create breathing space for creative civil rights dialogue unbeholden to the orthodoxies of either the left or the right."

C'mon. We don't need a Federal "conscience of the nation" and we don't need a "civil rights dialogue." (I mean, what's the con position in this "dialogue": that we should trample civil rights?) What we need is for everyone to get the best education for his or her capabilities and everything will come out fine.

In one way, this risible situation may be all for the best. In other words, the worse, the better. Mary Frances may so discredit the agency that it can be abolished.

I'm not saying there was never a need for such an agency, only that bureaucracies never go away when their purpose does, so this disaster may be a blessing in disguise.

37 posted on 12/06/2004 9:51:42 AM PST by Sarastro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
So when did you go blind?

That's good. Now I've got one for you.

Why does this commission still exist?

38 posted on 12/06/2004 9:51:50 AM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mondonico

Since her term is no longer in effect, change locks on her door, pack her stuff and leave it outside, and when she shows up and tries to enter warn her that she no longer works there if she does not leave the premises arrest her for trespassing.


39 posted on 12/06/2004 9:53:11 AM PST by weshess (I will stop hunting when the animals agree to quit jumping in front of my gun to commit suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

Zimbabwe is seeking dedicated professionals like this.


40 posted on 12/06/2004 9:53:45 AM PST by alrea (NPR is fact based journalism. They just need the DNC or the UN to send them their fax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson