Posted on 12/05/2004 2:00:09 PM PST by Coleus
Exactly! Can you imagine if the silky pony figured out a way to cash inon AIDS? He'd be channeling homosexuals in court rooms all over the US.
HIV/AIDS vs. Cancer
Some interesting statistics as it relates to the USA.
HIV/AIDS accounts for under 1% of deaths in America.
National Institute of Health spends $1,069 for each person afflicted with HIV/AIDS.
Cancer is the cause of over 23% of deaths in America.
National Institutes of Health spends $296 per person afflicted with cancer.
AIDS is, in an overwhelming majority of the cases, a preventable disease; cancer isn't. 1 in 2 males and 1 in 3 females will develop cancer over his or her lifetime.
Yes, you are correct -- it's widely considered chic to be HIV-positive!
Judging from some of the satiric websites during the '04 Presidential election campaign, he's already doing that outside of the courtroom. ;-)
Latex does a passable job stopping bacteria, but most bacteria are larger than the voids in the latex. If you have rips or slips, all bets are off anyway.
Thanks to modern medicine, the HIV-positive are living longer, apparently healthy, but still doing the things that got them sick in the first place. They are infecting others. So, ironically enough, medicine is working at cross-purposes when it agressively treats the HIV-positive and those with full-blown AIDS.
How about the effort for social security spousal survivor benefits?
How about the fact that federal money for AIDS "education" programs is a significant growth industry in the homosexual circles?
How about fundraisers which are in essence PC blackmail to extort donations or else be declaired homophobic, anti-social, or worse.
Yes, medicine is working at cross purposes. But what I find rather amazing is the gross misallocation of limited resources. The billions we are tossing down the fudgehole to try to cure AIDS would be better spend trying to cure diseases one does not elect to contract such as cancer or heart disease or diabetes. {Yeah, I know some diabetes is lifestyle related, but I wouldn't spend a penny on "curing" that other than to tell people borrow a phrase from P.Diddy: Change (your lifestyle) or Die!
The fact is that compared to heterosexuals, homosexuals are wildly promiscuous. The numbers of average sex partners cannot be compared. Add to that the fact that anal sex is much better at transmitting AIDS (as explainied up the thread) and there you have it.
And despite what some people like to think, heterosexual people (i.e. normal people) practice anal sex a LOT less than homosexuals, who practice it at rates almost 100%.
Chastity before marriage and lifelong fidelity in marriage are surefire ways not to get AIDS, other than needle sticks if one is a health care professional.
Here's another nice commentary from breakpoint.org (BTW, Budziszewski has other material on morality, logic, and society that is well-worth reading.)
from http://www.pfm.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=BreakPoint_Commentaries1&CONTENTID=14782&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm
Shocking Questions
Yes, There Are Answers
BreakPoint with Chuck Colson
December 3, 2004
Note: The following commentary includes graphic descriptions. This is not suitable for children.
Im at my wits end, the young woman wrote. Ive asked pastors, friends, parents, God, and message boards this question and still havent received an intelligent answer that I can live with. Why are homosexual acts wrong? Im a Christian and believe in the Bible, but this part always stumps me.
According to my friend, Dr. J. Budziszewski, author of the excellent new book, Ask Me Anything: Provocative Answers for College Students, disturbing questions like this show that church leaders arent providing young people with the whole picture about sexuality. They may be faithfully teaching Gods rules, but when asked why God made these rules, too often they say, Take two aspirin, and wait for the questions to go away.
The good news, says Budziszewski, is that we can answer disturbing questions. Where are the answers found? In our creational design.
People say homosexuality isnt natural, the young woman complained in her letter, but that cant be true because its found among animals. Budziszewski answers, But our nature is how God designed us. Whats natural for human beings isnt whatever you can find some animal doing; its whatever fulfills our design. Men and women were plainly designed for each othernot men for men, nor women for women. Children can be born in no other way.
But homosexual acts dont harm anyone, said the young woman. Budziszewski answers, The idea that homosexual acts dont harm anyone isnt even close to being true; they harm those who perform them at every level. To begin with the most obvious levelthe physicalhow could it not harm a man to suffer physical trauma because body parts are repeatedly forced into bodily openings that were designed for a radically different function? And the rates of a long, long list of diseases are also much higher among practicing homosexuals, and contrary to popular belief, this is true for lesbians as well as for gay men.
At the emotional level, Budziszewski explains, the damage of homosexual acts is just as grave. God designed the male-female pair to balance each other; by contrast, same-sex mating drives them out of balance. If you want an example, think of the anonymous, no-brakes promiscuity of men who have sex with hundreds, even thousands, of other men.
And what about spiritual harm? asks Budziszewski. In homosexual acts, youre seeking union with someone who is only your own mirror image, so in a way, youre still trapped inside yourself. You havent experienced the power of marital sexuality to take you beyond the Self; youre rejecting the challenge of union with someone who is really other. In that way, homosexual acts are less like marital intercourse than like masturbation with another body.
Thats frank, even startling language, but whats happened to our culture is startling too. When young people confused by the culture ask questions, they need clear, unvarnished answers to set their thinking straight. Thats why I recommend this great new book Ask Me Anything: Provocative Answers for College Students.
Gods rules for sex are never arbitrary; they are based on how He made us. As Budziszewski rightly says, its all in the design.
The Baptist Press scoff at make believe numbers. As I recall, the 10% crap originated from a 1948 flawed study from a Midwestern university that the media and academia love to cite.
This is because the disease spreads quicker through anal tissue. Anything does, which is why they use suppositories for alot of drugs (prescription). Now if there were a higher level of monogamy, there wouldn't be a problem either way.
I read that too. The most recent studies bear it out:
In the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. Interviews with 256 individuals who attended a New York City HIV clinic revealed that 41 percent engaged in unprotected sex after learning they were HIV positive. There are 2 prime factors in this increase:
Widespread methamphetamine use in clubs and bathhouses. Meth-induced lapses in judgment leading to promiscuous sexual behavior make users more likely to contract HIV during speed binges. Also, the drug itself increases transmission risk because it suppresses a part of the immune system which specifically defends against HIV.
Also, the introduction of antiretroviral therapy, far from curing AIDS has given rise to a bizarre gay subculture which celebrates the virus and eroticizes it. In this world, the men with HIV are the most desired, and the bug chasers will do anything to get the virus. (from Rolling Stone's report "Bug Chasers: The Men Who Secretly Long To Be HIV+")
These are some of the poorest victims of "tolerance and inclusiveness" It's very sad to read about these wasted lives.
40%, less then 1%, the other 99%---
So how many lifetimes do we have, to eliminate this plague before it eliminates us? 3 Lifetimes? 5? 10?
Lets send more money to Africa! Yeah, that'll help.
"From a Muslim perspective we would call it sin."
"From a Jewish perspective we would call it sin."
This...........
Genesis 13:13
Now the men of Sodom were wicked and were sinning greatly against the LORD.
Genesis 18:20-21
20. Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous
21. that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."
Genesis 19:4-7
4. Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom--both young and old--surrounded the house.
5. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."
6. Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him
7. and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing.
Isaiah 3:9
9. The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves.Ezekiel 16:49-50
49. "`Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.
50. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11
9. Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
10. nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.