Okay, let's call off D-Day, the Nazis might get upset.
Prophet of Doom : Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words |
![]() CLICK ON ABOVE IMAGE |
The CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THE REMAKING OF WORLD ORDER |
CLICK ON ABOVE IMAGE |
Yes, the War on Terror is necessary...but the claim that it'll prompt "Christianophobia" is pure nonsense.
First off, I haven't seen any Christians sawing the heads off of defenseless Muslims while shouting "God is great!"
Secondly, "Christianophobia" existed LONG before the War on Terror. Hell, look at how bent out of shape the ACLU and other Leftists are about it. Just show one crucifix or sing one Christmas carol and *WAAAAH*, they totally lose it and start filing lawsuits.
that a new form of racism, the hate for Christians
Note to the good Father. That racism has been around for a long long time.
"Christianophobia" has been around much longer than the Vatican admits, or the WOT has promulgated.
The liberal-socialist-commie-nazi-fascist media of all stripes, has and will continue to cover it up, as usual.
We hate Islamofascism. If more mulsims would stand up to denounce the mulsim supremist political theory of Islam, we would not need to challenge "all" of Islam.
Unfortunately, Mad Man Mo' put a defense mechanism in his twisted blood cult. He was the "last" prophet so their can be no Islamic reformation. The only reform that the lost sheep can engage in is to convert to the Judeo-Christian Bible (since they cite the same origins, albeit rewritten by Mohammed).
Shaira Law, jihad, et al are signs of a political theory, not a religion. We don't tolerate Nazism either.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Matthew 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all [men] for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.
I think he's confusing cause and effect. The terrorists' war on us is the result of Christianophobia, and Judeaphobia, and all-other-religions-including-moderate-Islamophobia.
Ping
It's not the war on terror, it's the anti-Christian bigotry of the liberal left that does the trick.
The Vatican is in a cleft stick, because they are responsible for the welfare of millions of Christians who are exposed to Muslim violence, and they have no military to protect them.
Nevertheless, this is clearly a stupid lie. The twentieth century produced more Christian martyrs than all the previous nineteen. The two chief causes of these martyrdoms were Communism and Islam. Christians have been persecuted in Muslim countries for fourteen hundred years. And proselytism has been forbidden. Missionaries have been murdered. Nothing new about this at all.
While I totally agree with the WOT and have been a very vocal supporter of Dubya's here in Italy, I don't think Archbishop Lajolo was complaining about anything. He was just stating facts. To me - mostly after years of biased reporting of the Vatican position about war, which VERY different from what we're used to think - it was very heartening to read that "necessary". He was speaking to scholars and US diplomats. This is a call to self conscience.
On the other side, the Vatican is not just a religious institution. They can't merge with one side. The Pope is the pastor of all men, even those who are darn wrong. At this moment, there are million among muslisms who won't follow the terrorists and their tyrants but are in need of a word from someone they can trust and that their leaders can't bash to harshly. It's important to undermine consensus. It's freedom we want to bring. The Vatican performs a fundamental diplomatic role -beside evangelization - and their activity is fundamental to reach places and persons you couldn't deal with otherwise.
If the war is deemed >"necessary" then the anti-crhistian feeling is unjustified. There will be less ground for the progressive catholic groups to claim tha this war is "imperialistic", and loyal catholics and patriots will be able to defend freedom with one more argument.
Always keep in mind that just like in the rest of the world and even in the USA the Amercan position is reported in a blatantly biased way by the MSM, so it is about the Vatican.
Monsignor Giovanni Lajolo ought to read the Bible. Jesus predicted "Christianophobia." Jesus said believers would be hated simply for their faith.
The Vatican pharmacy must be a hoppin' place. Anyone with a few braincells and knowledge of history knows that christians have very little to do with the war on terror. It's the islamic world vs. everyone else. Islam hates anything that stands in it's path and historically christians have been at the forefront of protecting western european values and interests for a few tens of centuries, so it's just guilt by association.
"Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?"
After the church sex-abuse scandal, the Vatican gets it wrong again. Hatred of Jews and Christians is the cause not the effect of Islamofascism.
=== This war, although necessary,
I'd love to know what they have on the Vatican's quislings. Must be good.