Here ya go:
Posted on 12/04/2004 9:30:59 AM PST by Loyalist
Only the brass pole was missing. A woman tried to lay down the law yesterday morning by performing a spontaneous striptease in family court.
She was protesting the judge's decision not to grant her motion for an adjournment.
The woman, who can't be named, claimed the judge was biased. She did not have a lawyer.
"I am not going to allow this to happen and as a form of non-violent protest, I am going to, at this point, start taking off my clothing," said the woman, who is in her early 30s.
The woman was in court for a hearing on guardianship of her eight-month-old daughter. She was trying to be declared in contempt of court in order to force the trial to adjourn.
'NOT EXHIBITIONISM'
"It's not exhibitionism. It's political, it's rights-based and it's going to keep happening until somebody gets me out of here, and I wish that would happen sooner rather than later," she said, as she undressed.
Queen's Bench Justice Gil Goodman tried to continue with the case in spite of the disruption. He asked the lawyer to begin giving evidence.
And she continued to disrobe.
"(The woman), just for the record, has removed what appears to be all her clothing except for her brassiere and her panties," Goodman said.
Then Goodman read from a psychiatric report that detailed some of the woman's apparent mental-health issues.
"Excuse me, your honour. Is this directly relevant?" she asked, wearing nothing but her underwear. "Are you suggesting, your honour, that the fact that I've taken off my clothes here is evidence of some kind of mental disorder?"
The woman continued to interrupt Goodman's attempt to hear the case.
"He doesn't care if it's fair or not, he just wants everybody to wear their clothing," she said. "You agree to hear my motion for judicial bias, and I'll put my clothes back on."
Soon, it became clear that court would have to take a recess.
Court took a 10-minute break then came back into session without the woman. She had apparently gotten dressed and had gone to the law courts library.
The case went on without her.
Outside court, news of the striptease was a popular subject.
One sheriff's officer even expressed how much he enjoyed his job yesterday, considering the apparent good looks of the impromptu stripper.
Was kidding, BILEEEEEVE me!
Here ya go:
Why is it scary? All women eventually look like that.
True, but you don't normally see them naked.
Or in church pews.
Eventually, they all turn out to be rotting corpses as well. I'll clue you in: we don't wanna see THAT, either!
*zing*
LOL!
Maybe she was afraid of winning the case..
Well, this should cinch it for her.
Some punch lines just write themselves. Anybody got a smoke?
IOW, she continued to take it all off. That's elegant writing, IMO.
The horror...the horror...
Kramer: "I'm out!"
Every time I see it I lose all concentration on the thread I'm reading and begin thinking about nuns (for some reason) and how pissed God must be at those women who are OBVIOUSLY old enough to know better.
(Plus it makes me a little nauseous.)
-Jack Nicholson, in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
It seems like every week someone is taking their clothes off for some stupid reason, men and woman.
Nah. We have our own socialist reeducation camp right down the road, calls itself "the University of Winnipeg". No wonder this place is such a (frozen) lefty hellhole.
Well this proves that justice isn't blind.
The whole time that picture was opening I kept praying, "Please dear God do not let Helen Thomas be in there."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.