Skip to comments.
A threat to vaporize 100 Muslim cities
WorldNetDaily ^
| 12-03-04
| David C. Atkins
Posted on 12/03/2004 11:00:39 PM PST by ChristianDefender
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 841-850 next last
To: Kornev
You are correct, and it is sad that we are sacrificing good troops for PC BS. This alone is grounds for an impeachment hearing. Okay, perhaps nuking Fallujah would have been a bit over the top, but an occasional B52 flyover with an accompanying rain of steel would have been easily warranted.
To: Strategerist
Yeah, but how many Tokyo and Hiroshima residents were really hardcore Shinto emperor types? Yep we burned/nuked them to the ground.
There's a way to win wars, and then there's the PC way to lose.
82
posted on
12/04/2004 12:18:50 AM PST
by
Kornev
To: Steel and Fire and Stone; sukhoi-30mki; swarthyguy; Arjun; CarrotAndStick
Pakistan is under control, to some extent.
Ha! That one line shows the lack of information behind the entire argument -- Pakistan is NOT under ourcontrol -- they still have the ISlsamic nuke, they are still run by a military dictator, they are still the largest sponsors and trainers of terrorists and they still harbor OBL
83
posted on
12/04/2004 12:19:27 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Not impeachment. Bush is just doing all he can. Sadly our society is so weak (look at this thread) that we just can't defeat our enemy anymore.
84
posted on
12/04/2004 12:20:58 AM PST
by
Kornev
To: fish hawk
So the terrorists bomb one of our cities with a dirty bomb. Now they are "Islam" so what country are you going to bomb back. These guys are individual gang like terrorists not "country" terrorists. As in Iraq now, there are Syrians, Iranians, Iraqis, Arabs, so who do you bomb?
We don't nuke allislamic cities -- we nuke the two cities where non muslimes are not allowed in -- Mecca and Medina.
85
posted on
12/04/2004 12:21:01 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: asgardshill
" This is the craziest and most remorselessly evil idea I've seen on FreeRepublic today. I'll pass, thanks."
You don't seem to understand that this is not going to be over for hundreds of years, or until one side is beaten. I would prefer it be them. I don't know where you are coming from, for all I know, you are "them".
86
posted on
12/04/2004 12:21:34 AM PST
by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: Melas
As an example: Italy was (officially) a catholic nation, and an Axis power. Should we have bombed a couple South American countries because they happened to be catholic as well? Of course not, it would have been stupid. Same here.
Again, complete ignorance -- Islamcbelieves in the concept of ummah -- the globalIslamic empire. There is NO such concept in Catholicism. OBL wants to re-establish the ummah with himself as Caliph, the head of the ummah.
87
posted on
12/04/2004 12:22:39 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: pete anderson
And if a Tim McVey were to attack Oklahoma City again are we going to Nuke to 100 Biggest American Cities?
That's a defunct comparison.
88
posted on
12/04/2004 12:23:22 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: pete anderson
Ahh, you see, he didn't say pEACE, but a similar sounding word starting with p ssss
89
posted on
12/04/2004 12:24:58 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: ChristianDefender
A desert of green glass from Marrakesh to Jakarta.
The second wave to anyone that complains.
Wait a year and they will be stronger. Wait 25
or even only 10 years and it may be to late
for Western Civilization.
This sounds extreme to many but these are
madmen that think their god wants us all dead.
Extreme force or no force. You don't just
"bomb an aspirin factory." If you bomb at all,
you must obliterate the memory that an aspirin
factory could have ever existed.
Comment #91 Removed by Moderator
To: ChristianDefender
Too much.
Established U.S. defense policy states that any use of a weapon of mass destruction is equivalent of any other use of a WMD. Thus, standing U.S. military doctrine dictates a scaled nuclear response to any chemical, biological or nuclear attack on the US or its interests.
That doctrine is at least 30 years old and is more than enough.
92
posted on
12/04/2004 12:25:18 AM PST
by
Petronski
(WARNING: Persons denying the existence of Robots may be Robots themselves.)
To: A Navy Vet; Happy2BMe
I have been reading much of the Koran, Hadith, and other clerical docs, and it seems to me there may come a time to be pre-emptive. Islam is the new facism. Anyone reading this needs only to research their various statements. See my tagline. I am so deadly serious.
93
posted on
12/04/2004 12:25:25 AM PST
by
backhoe
( Islam has become the 21st century version of Nazism.)
To: Strategerist
ok. we just nuke Mecca and Medina -- places non Muslimes are NOT ALLOWED to be in (it's like the Vatican saying only Catholics would be allowed in Rome -- but the Muslimes do IT)
SO, we just nuke muslimes and we destroy the moon god cult by destroying the one place he's supposed to stay in, by destroying the entire myth of invincibility, by releasing the power of the mullahs and ayatollahs over the people
94
posted on
12/04/2004 12:26:40 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: asgardshill
As I said -- just nuke Mecca and Medina.
95
posted on
12/04/2004 12:27:09 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
To: Cronos
And when he said that the US and Saudi Arabia have an "Eternal Friendship," what did he mean by that?
To: pete anderson
We can drill through radioactive glass.
To: ThePythonicCow
"An eye for an eye, perhaps ten eyes for an eye, but certainly not a thousand eyes for each eye.
Not right. Immoral. Plain and simple."
Assume it is agreed that hitting ALL muslim nations is immoral, as a response to a big hit.
Further assume we can fairly quickly determine the source(s) of such a hit. By sources, I mean like we determined 9/11/2001 originated from al Qaeda, which had an anchor in Afghanistan.
Further, it came out that the individuals came from certain countries, principally Saudi Arabia, for example.
I should hope we have put ALL nations on notice that we will use overwhelming force to respond to any hit, to include nulear force never before used.
I don't buy into the notion that Saudi Arabia is not held responsible for actions of its subjects, who wander off to Afghanistan, for example. Same for other places.
I would guess such threats of retaliation have been circulated, where they need to be.
The real big question is: What would the President in office, at the time, actually do?
Bush = fire away, perhaps
Kerry = call Kofi, convene UNSC
UNSC = Five permanent members, plus ten korrupt guys in kaftans.
To: Petronski
Would you have called Kennedy's statement that an attack from Cuba would mean the destruction of the USSR 'too much'?
It saved us. We need a full deterent now. We need the islamic world to know that any nuclear attack against the USA by any islamic representative will mean the destruction of the islamic world in full. Otherwise, we're just sitting ducks.
I know the islamic world is suicidal, but.. At least we can say 'yeah, they nuked us and wrecked the USA.. But we acted afterwards to eliminate that threat.'
Frankly, I say we need to eliminate the threat before the bright flashes. But, we won't. Like we didn't before the embasies or cole or 9/11.
99
posted on
12/04/2004 12:28:31 AM PST
by
Kornev
To: A Navy Vet
Although I'm not versed regarding "Mein Kampf", I have been reading much of the Koran, Hadith, and other clerical docs, and it seems to me there may come a time to be pre-emptive.
Exactly -- there are so many blind foolks who haven't read the Koran and yet yap about slam being the same as normal religions. NO, it's not. And I feel we MUST shout it from the rooftops -- go, read the Koran and see the evil in it for yourselves
100
posted on
12/04/2004 12:28:45 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 841-850 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson