Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A threat to vaporize 100 Muslim cities
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12-03-04 | David C. Atkins

Posted on 12/03/2004 11:00:39 PM PST by ChristianDefender

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 841-850 next last
To: Nateman
The plan has one major flaw: Moslems the world over have made plenty of people mad at them. What if one of those angry parties sees this as a fast way to rid the world of this contagious metal disease and sets off a nuke here just to get the US to do their dirty work?

My thoughts exactly. Reminds me of when I was a kid and my mother caught my younger brother stealing cookies out of the cupboard. She told him that the next time there were missing cookies, that he "would really get it."

So that night, I snuck downstairs and helped myself to the whole darn box!

421 posted on 12/04/2004 4:04:53 AM PST by SamAdams76 (Red Sox Win The World Series...And Bush Wins Re-election Too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender
Of course, the hand wringers, peaceniks and leftist elites would shout and scream bloody murder about how aggressive, unfair and politically incorrect this doctrine appears.

This would work and LEFTIST bedwetters can kiss my @$$ !
422 posted on 12/04/2004 4:12:37 AM PST by pyx (RULE #1 The LEFT lies. RULE #2 See RULE #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #423 Removed by Moderator

Comment #424 Removed by Moderator

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
There it is. I would only add that MAD also needed believable proselytizers like Kissinger to sell it to both sides.

There is no possibility of such an equivalent with a Muslim diaspora (although the deep irony is that in his wicked heart, Bin Laden wants to be Grand Caliph, which would thusly require the twin open targets of a seat of power and a standing army).

425 posted on 12/04/2004 4:18:16 AM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: antrix

Pakistan is not a responsible country. Pakistan has been selling nuclear secrets for years now.


426 posted on 12/04/2004 4:21:51 AM PST by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

Comment #427 Removed by Moderator

To: A Navy Vet
Number 4 on your list is the first thing that I have disagreed with you on this thread.

I believe that we have not been attacked again because of the present administration, and that they would know exactly what to do if a nuclear attack should occur..
428 posted on 12/04/2004 4:27:35 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe


429 posted on 12/04/2004 4:29:20 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP! ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #430 Removed by Moderator

To: ChristianDefender
This harkens to the notion of training a mule: First thing you do is smack it upside the head with a two-by-four to get it's attention.

Meet our two-by-four: a promise, not a threat, but a promise.

Guess what. We all of a sudden would have their undivided attention, whine-fest from the United Nations notwithstanding.

431 posted on 12/04/2004 4:30:47 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
As an example: Italy was (officially) a catholic nation, and an Axis power. Should we have bombed a couple South American countries because they happened to be catholic as well? Of course not, it would have been stupid. Same here.

False dichotomy. Italy didn't commit their crimes in WW2 because of their faith. This enemy today is doing exactly that.

Would you rather have a fundamentalist Christian living next door, or an Islamic fundamentalist? The difference is in the book they take literally. It's a huge difference. see Prophet of Doom for more on the Koran.

432 posted on 12/04/2004 4:38:42 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Political correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
FR received wisdom

That's two direct insulting attacks at regular FReepers in three postings on this one subject and you've only been here for a few months.

You (and others like you who deem themselves more intelligent and sophisticated then the rest of us) might want to tone down your very obvious seething contempt for us regular folk in the heartland of America, before you piss too many of us off.

433 posted on 12/04/2004 4:39:20 AM PST by pyx (RULE #1 The LEFT lies. RULE #2 See RULE #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender
This whole thread is laughable; nothing but bluster, posturing and chest beating.

There is nothing we can do to prevent a nuclear holocaust in DC or NY as long as we remain a free society.

Within 24 hours, I can take a 35' sport fishing yacht 45 miles off of VA, pick up a 200 kiloton nuke, and transport it to the DC marina less than 1/2 mile from the WH and Capitol.

There are no systems in place to prevent the holocaust, and there never will be unless we destroy the very country we are trying to protect.

Our current method of cultural domination is succeeding through McDonalds and Starbucks etc. It will take another 50 years but the Islamists will be tamed through affluence (as in N. Ireland), global corporations and western civilization.


BUMP

434 posted on 12/04/2004 4:59:38 AM PST by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tm22721

YES!! Get them addicted to Starbucks, McDonalds and Kentucky Fried Chicken!! Also, put up some barbecue joints and fire up the barbecue fragrances around mealtime every day; oh, only, it'll have to be beef instead of pork. I wonder how many are able to resist the barbecued pork really? Decadence. Decadence.

I wish people would decide the world is a big enough place for everyone to live in peace, plant a garden, help each other, resolve differences, and shut up.


435 posted on 12/04/2004 5:12:41 AM PST by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender

Throw France, Red China and the Rooskies into the mix (much like early SIOP, where any nuke from anyone would have triggered a massive attack on everyone) and you've got the start of an idea.


436 posted on 12/04/2004 5:18:08 AM PST by steveegg (At this point, even Baghdad Bob has more credibility than Dan Blather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Regarding: "MAD was directed at a power (a superpower) which could respond in kind. Nuking 100 cities is insane."

Reply: Let us not encumber our thoughts with yesterday's problems. I consider one and a half billion Muslims a SUPERPOWER. They may not have the industrial power or infrastructure to wage "OUR" kind of war, but they could instantaneously arm 100.000 suicidal Muslims with explosives, chemical, biological and radiological weapons. Without any doubt I believe Muslims will be arming their sex deprived lunatic jihadists with nuclear chastity belts.

The reasons offered for not nuking 100 Muslim cities is as unconscionable as Islam's Jihad with all non-Muslims, Christians and Jews. If we are to protect our children's freedom, our strategy should, at least, promise to all believers in Muhammad's Islam, all the pain that the Muhammad's lunatics intend for us. That means the Massive Attack and Perfect Destruction of all Muslim power.

I suggest you reexamine your interpretation of the word "superpower."


437 posted on 12/04/2004 5:19:30 AM PST by eakole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender
This enemy is in many ways much harder to cope with than an evil empire. It does not have an army, an economy, an infrastructure, a capital or a state to attack. This enemy refuses to show itself on the field of battle so we can destroy it with our superior weapons and tactics.

If one were to try and formulate a profile to take on one's enemy, this would be a brilliant one. As much as I hate to admit, it is brilliant in it's efficiency.

438 posted on 12/04/2004 5:23:45 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (All I ask from livin' is to have no chains on me. All I ask from dyin' is to go naturally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender
The popular support of the terrorists is much larger than it is politically correct to discuss in most forums in the West........Amen. The terrorists are nothing but the armies of mainstream, "peaceful" Islam.
439 posted on 12/04/2004 5:24:42 AM PST by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hleewilder
In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states.

I agree. As warm and cuddly as that doctrine makes me feel, it would have dire side effects. Not least of which would be that any American life, anywhere on the globe wouldn't be worth a wet slap. Especially our people in uniform. The Phillipines, Japan and Korea would all be places where wholesale slaughter of our people would take place even before the dust settles on what used to be Damascus.

440 posted on 12/04/2004 5:28:32 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (All I ask from livin' is to have no chains on me. All I ask from dyin' is to go naturally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 841-850 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson