Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anybody heard about Japan's Aircraft Carrier?

Posted on 12/02/2004 11:23:43 AM PST by sociotard

Now, this was posted on another thread I frequent, and since an admittedly half-hearted search didn't turn up anything on the subject, I'm posting it for your eyes.

The Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force has been noted for a couple of things. One of those has been it's capability. Most pundits rate it as the #2 navy in the world. Now Japan also has a rather colorful history in terms of military expansionism, so one of the things that tends to freak out the neighbors is any time the Japanese say the words "Aircraft Carrier". This has become a phrase not even uttered anymore in JMSDF thinking. So, when they decided they needed some flagship capable Destroyers capable of carrying helicopters, much like their current Haruna and Shirane classes, they most certainly did not say "Aircraft Carrier". They said Destroyers. Just a quick pop quiz for folks....below are some pictures of modern destroyers, including the previously mentioned Helicopter carrying Destroyers, the Shiranes, and then some small aircraft carriers in service with other countries, followed by the designated DDH-X proposed by Japan. I'll let ya'll decide what the DDH-X really is.

Destroyers by Class name:

Arleigh Burke: http://www.gibbscox.com/photos/arleigh2.gif
Manchester: http://www.mattmar.com.au/Warships_..._manchester.jpg
Brandenberg: http://www.naval-technology.com/pro...ages/f122_1.jpg
Shirane: http://www.globalsecurity.org/milit...ST-87-09121.jpg

Aircraft Carriers by Class name:

Giuseppe Garibaldi: http://www.naval-technology.com/pro.../garibaldi6.jpg
Invincible: http://www.naval-technology.com/pro...ible_new_10.jpg

The Japanese DDH-X: http://www.ships-net.co.jp/detl/200107/091l.jpg

I find his comments suspect, since I find it hard to believe japan has the number two navy, but interesting nonetheless.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; carrier; ddhx; destroyer; helicopter; helicoptercarrier; japan; japanesemilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2004 11:23:44 AM PST by sociotard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Links got shortened...


2 posted on 12/02/2004 11:26:02 AM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Wasn't it lost with a couple of others at the battle of Midway? Heard the sunk like a rock.


3 posted on 12/02/2004 11:26:16 AM PST by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Hello?


4 posted on 12/02/2004 11:27:25 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

5 posted on 12/02/2004 11:27:48 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Looks like they have an old British and an Italian aircraft carrier...


6 posted on 12/02/2004 11:28:25 AM PST by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard
Anybody heard about Japan's Aircraft Carrier?

I'll bite, no, what about it?

(OK, so what's the punchline?)

7 posted on 12/02/2004 11:28:32 AM PST by Lurking in Kansas (;&ôÀžUñj/ÈëžÕ “ ’· ....If you have to ask, you wouldn't understand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

8 posted on 12/02/2004 11:29:00 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Japan needs to step up in that region. The other options aren't very good.

As a side note, Japan today shows what American troops taking over a dictatorship can do. We had to stay there for quite some time too. Today, I have no problem trusting the Japanese. Can't say that about many other countries.

patent


9 posted on 12/02/2004 11:29:40 AM PST by patent (A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Apparently the procurement specs crossed out "machine gun" and wrote in "pizza oven."


10 posted on 12/02/2004 11:30:29 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

The Japs having aircraft carriers does not worry me.

As long as they are RED or Muslim.


11 posted on 12/02/2004 11:30:34 AM PST by t-1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo
I believe the eyewitness account was "Look at that flat-top burn!"
12 posted on 12/02/2004 11:30:45 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo

If memory serves, the US strike force escorting, protecting, and including Yorktown, Enterprise, and a third US carrier (either Saratoga or Hornet) sank three of the four Japanese carriers attacking A-F.


13 posted on 12/02/2004 11:30:51 AM PST by Frank L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Sounds like a setup for a joke....

It's built sideways??


14 posted on 12/02/2004 11:30:58 AM PST by freedumb2003 (When does the Revolution start? I'm going for a bike ride for a while. Please fill me in later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

The Japs having aircraft carriers does not worry me.

As long as they are NOT RED or Muslim.


15 posted on 12/02/2004 11:31:03 AM PST by t-1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sociotard

Are these Nissans or Toyota's ?


16 posted on 12/02/2004 11:31:11 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sociotard
Already Covered Here
17 posted on 12/02/2004 11:31:50 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank L

It was the Hornet.


18 posted on 12/02/2004 11:32:20 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

They can call that a "destroyer" if they like ... she's their ship. But I note that her "top" is remarkably "flat" ... She could be a formidable sea control and ASW asset.


19 posted on 12/02/2004 11:32:39 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sociotard
Are they going to name it the Yamamoto?
20 posted on 12/02/2004 11:32:52 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson