Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

I'm not sure if this is a good idea. It would lead to tinkering with the process in every state, according to which party would benefit and which party happened to be in control, and probably it would also lead to interference in the process by judges, who have already imposed all sorts of redistricting decisions on the state legislatures.


4 posted on 12/01/2004 6:19:36 PM PST by Cicero (Nil illegitemus carborundum est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

Have you looked at a county by county map recently?
Imagine if you 'democratized' Maryland and Pennsylvania? I won't even get into New York or New Jersey.

Where would the demos counter? Florida? Please. Texas?

This would kill the DNC.


8 posted on 12/01/2004 6:22:17 PM PST by dyed_in_the_wool (01000101011000010111010000100000 0110000101110100001000000100101001101111011001010010011101110011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Read Article II of the US Constitution : The State shall determine how electors are chosen. Frankly, the legislator, if wanted too, could deny the public the right to vote in a Presidential election.
10 posted on 12/01/2004 6:24:00 PM PST by Perdogg (W stands for Winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
I'm positive it's not a good idea. The older I get and the more I see, the more respect I have for the folks who put together the Constitution of the United Stated and our form of government. Checks and balances are a good thing, and that applies to the electoral college.

The Divine Hand of Providence helped the Founders, and we should leave it alone as much as possible, for as long as possible.

19 posted on 12/01/2004 6:34:11 PM PST by Bernard (Caution Ahead - Road being Paved with Good Intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Algore might have been the President of the US in 2000 had this scenario been allowed to play out in Broward and Palm Beach counties.


42 posted on 12/01/2004 6:50:29 PM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
I share your concerns. Our founding fathers have been proven, time and again, to be wise beyond all understanding and expectation. I think we should stick with what they designed. Your point about judges tinkering with the redistricting processes in the states is very astute!
59 posted on 12/01/2004 7:26:33 PM PST by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Works great in Wyoming! :-)!


75 posted on 12/01/2004 8:23:10 PM PST by klamath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
I'm not sure if this is a good idea. It would lead to tinkering with the process in every state, according to which party would benefit and which party happened to be in control, and probably it would also lead to interference in the process by judges, who have already imposed all sorts of redistricting decisions on the state legislatures.

While it would be good for Republicans, I would hate to see this become the rage. Rural states have increased electoral power the way it is now, the yeoman farmer concept. Its a good thing.
91 posted on 12/01/2004 11:16:26 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson