Posted on 11/27/2004 11:48:37 PM PST by JohnHuang2
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
Thank God the CIA is rid of this unhinged "annonymous" idiot and his ilk. With idiots like him working in the CIA its no wonder we were hit on 9/11 and a bonified miracle we haven't been hit since 9/11.
Michael Scheuer is a two-bit, liberal-demokkkRAT, butt-boy-turd-slurping, degenerate, hate-America, asswipe, deviant, degenerate dirtbag, traitorous, seditionist, garbage, PUNK, worthy of trial, conviction, and IMMEDIATE execution, in a time of war.
As are all subhumans convicted by a Military Tribunal.
Is it any wonder why the Bush administration appointed Porter Goss as director of the CIA with the intention of cleaning house? For Mr. Bush to move forward effectively with his plans to democratize the Middle East, CIA analysts like Mr. Scheuer must know that their worldview has been proved wrong.
___________________________
It has been wrong since it's enception during the Carter Administration.
Enema is more like it.
The CIA and The State Dept need Spring Cleaning......
Ditto to all you said.
IMHO, Iraq is the reason we haven't been hit since 9/11. The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq has forced groups like al-Qaeda to divert enormous time and resources to sabatoge our mission there. By going on the offensive -- taking the fight to the enemy on the enemy's own home turf -- Bush has put al-Qaeda on defense. So, in a sense, Iraq has been a diversion -- for the terrorists who would rather fight us here than there.
Indians, Sudanese, Indonesians, Australians, Philippinos, Dutch, Spaniards, etc.?
It isn't Israel. It is ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY that would dare stand in the way of their political expansion.
All one need do is read the news. Anywhere they think they can get away with terror, islamic terror will take place.
It is us or them. We need a high kill ratio.
Don't sugar coat it; let us know how you REALLY feel.
Good grief, this guy can even pull the wool over the eyes of the washtimes. He's no apologist for Bin Laden? Then how come he favors EVERY arguement/policy of the Bin Laden apologists?
Unhinged is the operative word here. I've heard a few interviews and read a number of articles on this vengeful nutjob. This guy's ability to express opposing opinions in the same paragraph rivals that of the early 90's interviews of "Mad Vlad" Zhirinovsky. He insists he is no fan of Bin Laden then expresses admiration for him. He says it would be foolish to try and appease him then says we should do exactly that. The CIA's former Al Qaeda expert says the plight of the Palestinians in one of Al Qaeda's principal motivations and that we should abandon Israel in order to buy peace when even I know that ol' Binny never breathed a word about the palis until he saw footage of them dancing in the streets on 9/11 then belatedly paid lip service to their cause. He says we are not nearly ruthless and brutal enough in pursuing Al Qaeda but that everything we actually DO is completely wrongheaded and will only make us more enemies. It just goes on and on. I'm with other conservative commentators that it was out of pure political motivation that Tenet and the CIA establishment gave this clown the fast track to green light his incoherent screed to sway the election.
Scheuer is so over the top he makes grandstanding Jack Ryan wannabe (you should read some of the choice excerpts from HIS book) Richard Clarke look like the heart and soul of propriety.
I actually used that logic against my Muslim coworker who said all Arab/US relations would be fine if the US stopped the aid. He looked perplexed as if he hadn't heard that one before. I baited him into some real anti-semetic stuff, then gave him transcripts of Hitler, about the Jewish international financial cabal, etc. I said, Hitler had it right, huh, kill 'em all?" He quickly returned, "Oh no, that's not what I said." I witnessed the Muslim lie.
It can't be said often enough. Our troops are over there to protect the rest of us here.
S E C R E T A G E N T G O L D F I N G E R |
Two different kettle of fish. CIA, might be cleaned up. A classmate of mine I believe works for the Agency has said the paper shufflers outnumber the workers 3 or 4 to one, just like a big corporation. The difficulty in State is the ability to FIRE somebody. Almost impossible.
There is definitly a huge "restructuring" and "downsizing" needed. I've never seen it in a government agency and doubt that it will happen. I think that this is the reason the Patriot Act and the 9-11 commission came up with the idea of combining the intelligence agencies, thereby giving the executive branch a way of culling out the deadwood.
Does anybody know the structure of the employment rules for State?
That's not what Patty Murray says.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.