If it is born (which it's not) look for the entitlements to be demanded. It's the key to hand outs and perceved respect.
Gays are secretly very scared of any discovery that the cause may be genetic. Because the next step, presumably, would be the abortion of babies who carry the gene.
Can't have that, can we?
___________________________
Number one, no one knows this, including you and me. Number two, if it turns out to be genetic and identifiable in utero it will spell the end of Roe v. Wade and the democratic party. When lib women start aborting because they don't want a gay kid the gay and feminist wings of the left will destroy each other over the "rights of the unborn".
Personally I don't see that it matters one way or the other if it's "inborn" or not. Lets say that some day they can tell by a catscan wether or not a person has homosexual tendencies. Does that make any difference? Not to me it doesn't. There are all kinds of brain disorders out there are I'm sure many of them are "inborn". So what if they actually find that homosexuality is caused by one of these brain disorders (or even a structural deformity in the brain). I don't see how it makes any difference, except that they might find more effective means for treating it.
I've read before that serial killers and mass murderers have a common brain deficiency that they can prove with a catscan. The theory is that the part of the brain that contains the "conscience" is underdeveloped or missing completely. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if there is a similar deficiency in a gay person's brain.
Your sources, please? I don't ask this question out of irreverence. I just think that many people, scientists, fathers (like Vice-President Cheney) are desperately seeking the answer to this age-old question. If your response is based soley on your religious beliefs, I will respect that. But there are many of us who want the scientific perspective as well.