To: nickcarraway
Pro-life judges are no more desirable to me than pro-abort judges. I want pro-Constitution, pro-republic judges. Deferring authority to the Legislature is not equivelant to being pro-life. It means that the question properly resides outside the jurisdiction of the courts. Similarly, one can be anti-Roe without being pro-life, in theory anyway. I want Scalias, meaning objective referees, not idealogues of any stripe.
2 posted on
11/25/2004 10:08:58 AM PST by
Huck
(The day will come when liberals will complain that chess is too violent .)
To: nickcarraway
It is my understanding that Laura I. clerked for Clarence Thomas.
6 posted on
11/25/2004 10:27:16 AM PST by
Peelod
(Perversion is not festive)
To: nickcarraway
I hope that President Bush will opt to Alito and Luttig for the SC. They are very cultured and they hang tough on principles. A true guarantee.
To: nickcarraway
Bush's Potential Supreme Court Picks are Pro-Life on Abortion They ARE?!?!?!
Whoda thunk!!!!
9 posted on
11/25/2004 10:33:52 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: nickcarraway
Those top six sound like mighty fine choices. I have been very critical of the President for going left, but if he nominates any of those six and fights for them I will be glad to eat my words.
12 posted on
11/25/2004 10:52:08 AM PST by
Ahban
To: nickcarraway
Nick: Thanks for all the valuable insight on this subject. Did it ever enter your mind that most average people already know all this stuff? They do.Sharing all this easy to obtain info as if it's the greatest stuff since sliced bread makes even dull folks wonder about you.
Get a hobby that keeps you out of the public eye...OK?
14 posted on
11/25/2004 11:17:14 AM PST by
CBart95
To: nickcarraway
Bump for reading when the time comes....lol
18 posted on
11/25/2004 11:31:19 AM PST by
MissouriConservative
(A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul)
To: nickcarraway
It would be nice to know the ages of these judges.
To: nickcarraway
This is the typical subtle lie we've grown to expect from the new york slimes: "A recentCBS-New York Times poll found that 64 percent of those polled said they thought Bush would appoint pro-life judges who favor making abortion illegal." And just how will overturning Roe make abortion illegal? Sick bastards will write any lie to defend the horrific holocaust they want to continue. Liberal pukes want it to be a debate of 'all or nothings' in order to keep it open season on alive unborn children!
30 posted on
11/25/2004 12:10:57 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
If a judge cannot even understand that killing some child is wrong, do you want him deciding your fate? Any Pro Abortion Judge is brain dead to start with.
37 posted on
11/25/2004 12:56:44 PM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: nickcarraway
Now for the real question: Will Bush and the Republicans get serious about confronting the Democrats if they start in with their antics again?
38 posted on
11/25/2004 1:55:56 PM PST by
inquest
(Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
To: nickcarraway; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; ...
Thanksgiving day prayers for life!
48 posted on
11/25/2004 6:48:22 PM PST by
narses
(Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family + Vivo Christo Rey!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson