Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Pro-life judges are no more desirable to me than pro-abort judges. I want pro-Constitution, pro-republic judges. Deferring authority to the Legislature is not equivelant to being pro-life. It means that the question properly resides outside the jurisdiction of the courts. Similarly, one can be anti-Roe without being pro-life, in theory anyway. I want Scalias, meaning objective referees, not idealogues of any stripe.


2 posted on 11/25/2004 10:08:58 AM PST by Huck (The day will come when liberals will complain that chess is too violent .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Pro-Constitution judges ARE pro-life.


3 posted on 11/25/2004 10:17:58 AM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

Here's the deal. If you are willing to ACCEPT pro-life judges, then you will get your conservative, constitutional judges. If you are not, you won't.

It can be argued, of course, that the right to life is constitutional, that it is the most basic of the inalienable rights, which the Founding Fathers declared to be "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." If your life isn't safe from arbitrary seizure, then what good are liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

In any case, the practical point is that those who don't care about the abortion issue, or even those who are somewhat pro-abortion, can afford to compromise. Those who are pro-life will not compromise. They haven't for 30 years since Roe v. Wade, and they never will. So why not welcome them as allies of the conservative cause?


5 posted on 11/25/2004 10:23:24 AM PST by Cicero (Nil illegitemus carborundum est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Pro-life judges are no more desirable to me than pro-abort judges. I want pro-Constitution, pro-republic judges. Deferring authority to the Legislature is not equivelant to being pro-life. It means that the question properly resides outside the jurisdiction of the courts. Similarly, one can be anti-Roe without being pro-life, in theory anyway. I want Scalias, meaning objective referees, not idealogues of any stripe.

Think of it as access to a "Colgate invincible, tungsten cowhide, turbo encabulated spade shovel" digging us out of a hole, slowly but surely.

16 posted on 11/25/2004 11:25:47 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Pro-life judges are no more desirable to me than pro-abort judges. I want pro-Constitution, pro-republic judges

What do you think "The RIGHT to LIFE, Liberty..." actually means?????? Sheeesh...

22 posted on 11/25/2004 11:50:38 AM PST by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
The prerequisite for the incoming Supreme Court Justices need NOT be based upon complexion, race or creed, but whether they are strict Constitutionalists who value the sanctity of life in the womb.

Why should this be so hard?

46 posted on 11/25/2004 5:17:08 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
"Pro-life judges are no more desirable to me than pro-abort judges. I want pro-Constitution, pro-republic judges.".........Well said. I agree completely. It does not matter to me whether a judge thinks abortion if FORBIDDEN by god, or is a basic motherly right. It matters whether the judge sees such forbiddance or right in the constitution (it ain't there).
137 posted on 11/27/2004 8:45:03 AM PST by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson