Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema

I'm not sure if you're against it because they're for it or if you're just putting it out there that Soros and Zbiggy supported an idea like this.

I cannot believe the number of Freepers who have jumped on the "Soros likes it so it must be bad" bandwagon. I hope that is not where you are falling. Soros presumably would not have every other person in the U.S. shot, either. Should we then support that? John Kerry once voiced supported for a larger military presence in Iraq. Should we be against that? He also voiced support for withdrawing--should we then be against both?


49 posted on 11/26/2004 8:45:18 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile
I don't like the entire crew behind Yuschenko. And beyond that I think Soros is the forerunner for the antiChrist. You probably don't know as much about his spending as I do. I work in healthcare. Soros is funding pilot programs in this country promoting earlier deaths for chronically ill children. This goes against everything I do for a living. I despise and loathe Soros, probably beyond what you can imagine, because he is far more than a political gameplayer, he is anti-life and the father of the culture of death.

So yes, to answer your question, there is nothing good about Soros and what he supports.

You may want to spend some time browsing his pro-death website.

52 posted on 11/26/2004 9:00:14 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile

LibertarianInExile: "I cannot believe the number of Freepers who have jumped on the "Soros likes it so it must be bad" bandwagon."

Thank God someone is making sense ... yes, it could just happen that somewhere in the world, Soros and Bush are *on the same side* - namely, together against the *actual* communists of the world - against authoritarian mob rule, and for a new 1989 ...

Hey, Reagan and Soros were on the same side back then after all, too - its what made the Milosevic's, Meciar's and Iliescu's of this world come to hate Soros's guts. After all, he funded pretty much every democratic, anti-communist opposition NGO there was in their countries.

In the US, "liberal" means lefty. But in Romania or Russia or Serbia or, yes, the Ukraine, "liberal" means anti-communist. It means being for a country where the ballot boxes arent stuffed and independent journalists dont run the risk of being beheaded, like one was in the Ukraine, apparently on Kuchma's orders.

Gentlemen, pick your side ...


97 posted on 11/29/2004 6:25:46 PM PST by nimh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson