Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
Anyway the whole thing was written out by Ziggy Brzezinski many years ago in a book. It's about the division of Russia into small (powerless) countries, and western control of them. Ziggy wrote that NATO should go for first Poland and then Ukraine. He wanted to use NATO to pull Russia's satellite countries away from her influence, eventually surrounding her with westernized countries that relied on us or other western powers primarily.

Just google the "Brzezinski plan". It's not only Brzezinski and Soros but Halfbright and cronies who are into this. Russia has long been threatened by this scenario.

48 posted on 11/26/2004 7:07:55 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: MarMema

I'm not sure if you're against it because they're for it or if you're just putting it out there that Soros and Zbiggy supported an idea like this.

I cannot believe the number of Freepers who have jumped on the "Soros likes it so it must be bad" bandwagon. I hope that is not where you are falling. Soros presumably would not have every other person in the U.S. shot, either. Should we then support that? John Kerry once voiced supported for a larger military presence in Iraq. Should we be against that? He also voiced support for withdrawing--should we then be against both?


49 posted on 11/26/2004 8:45:18 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson