Posted on 11/22/2004 11:05:11 AM PST by mhking
.
WILLIAM CLINTON
HILLARY RODHAM
JOHN KERRY
...were all on the side of our Terrorist Enemy, Communist Vietnam Dictator HO CHI MINH, and against US all during the the Vietnam War.
During the 1990's...
WILLIAM CLINTON
HILLARY RODHAM
...refused 3 free offers from the Sudan to give us our No. 1 Terrorist Enemy OSAMA bin LADEN on a Silver Platter, offers that would have prevented us from having to deal with him now after 1,000's have lost their lives here.
Remember the Lost and Suffering on September 11, 2001
http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=33
NEVER FORGET
.
With all due respect you forgot the BARF ALERT!!!!
The hole in this logic is that Saadam was intimately tied to terrorism...
And the proof of this is where?
Oh yeah, funny how the writer doesn't mention how AQ grew in both numbers and strength under Clinton-Gore.
I don't have any respect for liberals who base all of their arguments on watery assumptions that have no basis in fact and that has always been Bookman's mo. He does too much of the 'everybody knows' crap.
There is enough illogic and unprovable stuff in this paragraph to choke a horse.
Six degress of idiocy.
The hole in this logic is that Saadam was intimately tied to terrorism...
-------
Actually, there are SO MANY holes in his logic, it is difficult to decide which one to drive the bomb-laden truck through!
Especially when there is plenty of reason to believe that Gore could have gone to war with Iraq for no reason at all (see Kosovo/Serbia for a good example of this during Clinton's second term in office).
I got my decoder ring, freeper handbook, and I've been flamed by just about everybody for something or other..... what am I missing???
For example, if Gore had been president, he might have launched a full-scale invasion of Afghanistan instead of holding back manpower and other resources for later use in Iraq, as President Bush did. And if he did that, we might have succeeded in capturing or killing bin Laden.
QUOTE
This is nuts. You don't need 120000 troops to catch one person. Just a few Navy Seals and INFORMATION where he is. We'll get the SOB. Stupid writer!
Well, I think the pajammahadeen don't take ANY restrictions (even those merely implied tongue-in-cheek from a counter-point post) on their FReeping lying down.
BTW - did you get the new, super-secret digital encoding/analog decoding (DE/AD) ring??? ;-P
Gore is a product of '3 missiles and you're out' school of x42i and a certain aspirin factory. His war would have lasted 2 days and we would have lost.
Then, obviously, Lieberman would have spiked his ice tea, took over, executed Yes-sir Youarafat, nuked Iraq and gave it to Israel.
Obviously. :-)
Thank God, liberals are no longer in charge. If you want to see what happens to a country with liberals in control with a RINO in lead, look no further than California. Now they are thinking of taxing us for the miles we drive......God help us, if they figure a way to tax us for sunny days....
Yes, but I got the one with the flip-top make-up kit by accident. :-(
I agree. This is good one. This anti Clinton, anti Bush pro Gore article that is pure unadulterated Irish BS.
I agree only with the premise that Clinton is to blame for the death 3000 American on 911 and state of islamic terrorism in the world pre Bush.
However, I would venture to say that the decline started in the Carter administration that allowed Islamic extremists to take root in Iran and other countries.
nick
No doubt. However the short-sighted MSM would *never* so much as imply that trouble was brewing back then - and on a dimrat president's watch, no less.
Nope. Instead, we have to put up with mindless drivel such as this article passed off as being a journalistic cutting-edge epiphany.
As soon as I saw the name of the newspaper, I quit reading.
Only in hindsight and only in an attempt to damage Bush. He supported intervention in Kosovo after all and there was less justification for that than there was for intervention in Iraq.
Gore would have gone after Bin Ladin? I doubt that very much
Red
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.