Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Lost Ohio?
New York Times Magazine ^ | November 21, 2004 | MATT BAI

Posted on 11/21/2004 6:22:22 AM PST by John Jorsett

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: John Jorsett; GOPcapitalist; BUSHdude2000; Dog Gone; Flyer; bgsugar
I have read political analysis since 1966, spoken with dozens of local and national consultants, and pay close attention to politics. This is a wonderful explanation of what a campaign, in changing times, can do when it recognizes a demographic move before the opposition does.

This example, from the democrat side, also follows closely what I heard from Ohio Republicans, the RNC, and Ohio FReepers, before the election. Anyone who thinks people like Rove are useless, needs to read this paper.

61 posted on 11/21/2004 8:36:09 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (May God Bless the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
These folks are such freakin crybabies.

Did you read this? It is an excellent analysis of what happened and is not a crybaby story. If you can't relate to the feelings of the guy, I suspect you have never given much time to a campaign that was lost.

62 posted on 11/21/2004 8:39:27 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (May God Bless the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
So you believe that a guy who has worked on a losing race is not worth hiring? By your logic we would have been pretty thin in the Texas Republican Party before the mid 80's.
63 posted on 11/21/2004 8:43:14 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (May God Bless the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Following are some of the stated goals of the ACLU, from its own published Policy Issues:

Compare those 'policies' you've listed with the stated goals of the Communist Party on this thread and that hair you have standing at attention will surely fall out.

64 posted on 11/21/2004 8:44:13 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (May the wings of Liberty never lose so much as a feather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon

Fascinating read. Thanks for the ping to it.


65 posted on 11/21/2004 8:58:52 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

The third loss was the charm.


66 posted on 11/21/2004 9:16:56 AM PST by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Thanks for posting the link to that thread.. When you see how many members of both houses are also members of the Democratic Socialists of America;(Listed here:

http://web.archive.org/web/20010602181018/http://www.mmcw.homestead.com/DSA.html) and note their voting records and words, it's more than obvious that these people are moving the pieces in puzzle of the ultimate goal which is: Communism.

You have the stated goals of the ACLU, the OBVIOUS correlation with the Communist manifesto, and Congress members committed to obstruct anything and everything to move their agenda.

The ACLU must be crushed, and these members of Congress MUST be voted out.

67 posted on 11/21/2004 9:26:09 AM PST by JesseJane (Air France flights 1192, 491, 288, 751, 216, now boarding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
What do you say to someone at a moment like that?

Nah-na-na-boo-boo! Loo-hoo-hoo-hoo-ser!!!

68 posted on 11/21/2004 9:32:54 AM PST by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

I thought we weren't allowed to post entire articles from NYT.


69 posted on 11/21/2004 9:35:55 AM PST by Hildy (The really great men are always simple and true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Bill,
I went to the site as well, and typed POLICY 4 (as one example) in the SEARCH BOX. It returned to me a number of 'hits' of lawsuits and briefs the ACLU has filed. There doesn't seem to be a listing of the goals by policy number (at least that which I can find on this short search), but perhaps emailing Diane Dew (who wrote the original piece) may have something further to help answer your question. Scanning down the list of lawsuits, several fit the Category of Privacy issues. One thought is that they may have recategorized issues for website purposes, and perhaps there was something older in policy formatting that correlates with her references. Just thinking outloud here..


70 posted on 11/21/2004 9:41:10 AM PST by JesseJane (Air France flights 1192, 491, 288, 751, 216, now boarding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
And I continue to splash happily in the pool of their bitter tears.....HA!HA! LOL! :))
71 posted on 11/21/2004 9:45:59 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
I planned to stop gloating some time after Thanksgiving.

(guess what I am giving thanks for! ~grin)

But if they keep on going on like they have I am going to have to make it a New Years Resolution instead.

72 posted on 11/21/2004 9:58:48 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (I shall follow your advise to the letter...the day I replace my brain with a cauliflower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: don-o

''They just came in droves,'' Jennifer Palmieri told me two days after the election. ''We didn't know they had that room to grow. It's like, 'Crunch all you want -- we'll make more.' They just make more Republicans.''


"Jennifer, probably unintentionally, nails it here. Could it be that all the non-procreating homosexuals and abortion loving Dimmi's are falling below replacement birth rates?"




I thought the same thing, don-o! Well said!


73 posted on 11/21/2004 10:26:18 AM PST by TEXOKIE (Father in Heaven, take command of America and her Mission, her leaders, her people, and her troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
*Yawn*

This is a lengthy article, even for this paper.

Somehow, the writers and editors of Liberal newspapers must think everybody spends all their waking moments wondering about all the possible details up to and including the bowel movements of Liberals, who wring their hands and pontificate endlessly as this article shows.

Get on with life, Liberals - if you can, without control over the lives of everybody else. You lost. That's all we care about!

74 posted on 11/21/2004 10:41:33 AM PST by Gritty ("As long as Democrats stay on the wrong side of the guns’n’God issues they will decline-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Bouchard had molded an impressive, almost military operation. He took over Ohio from a previous director last April, after running field operations for Bob Graham and then Wesley Clark in each man's failed bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Keep up the 'impressive' work Monsieur Bouchard!

75 posted on 11/21/2004 10:50:57 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

"We've got the reality"

He didn't believe in the Republican turnout plan. "What they talked about is a dream," he told me at one point. "We've got the reality. They're wishing they had what we've got."

76 posted on 11/21/2004 10:57:10 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Next time a barf alert would be nice, especially when it's a long rant from a major gas bag rag.


77 posted on 11/21/2004 12:13:24 PM PST by SlightOfTongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

What a long and interesting article.
Thanks for posting it.


78 posted on 11/21/2004 12:31:29 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

79 posted on 11/21/2004 1:10:56 PM PST by TBarnett34 ("Unnngh!" -John F'n Kerry, 11/2/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I have to say this....it's a pity Steve Rosenthal is such a lefty. In real life, he's a really decent person. Though it may be hard for many here to see...it's not that our goals are so different...it's the process to reach those goals where we land at an impass.
That said...I'm still so psyched we won!!!!
80 posted on 11/21/2004 1:38:42 PM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson