Posted on 11/20/2004 4:13:02 PM PST by wjersey
Edited on 11/20/2004 7:38:20 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
President Bush stepped into the middle of a confrontation and pulled his lead Secret Service agent away from Chilean security officials who barred his bodyguards from entering an elegant dinner for 21 world leaders Saturday night.
Several Chilean and American agents got into a pushing and shoving match outside the cultural center where the dinner was held. Bush noticed the fracas after posing for pictures on a red carpet with the summit host, Chilean President Ricardo Lagos and his wife and first lady Laura Bush.
So he/she is a Chilean operative?
Thanks for pinging him.
That's not what I said. But I notice that it used that same super-hyped rhetorical clintonian language in it's send-off to another poster.
Why in the world would you feel the need to use freep mail for any kind of correspondence?
Having dealt with the secret service on several occasions, they are
consummate professionals. Whatever happened was the fault of the
Chileans, no question.
"My assessment is that (in that photo, MediaMole) those several standing immediately by the President as he approaches the fray are not USSS, but rather, Chilean protection service amd[protocol types."
YES and a ton of guys with VIDEO CAMERAS,
Didn't the Taliban/AlQuida assasinate a chief in Afghanistan using an explosive/gun in a video camera.?
You're working a flame war on me (Chilean apologist, Didn't see danger in Iraq, etc.) and flame wars are boring on the forum. What is your problem?
Admin Mod, please delete post 933.
Link to article is:
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041120-113709-8651r.htm
Every time I think of Clinton and the Secret Service, I think of that scene from The Last Boy Scout with Bruce Willis standing outside a suite of rooms listening to a senator beating up a prostitute.
Don't know why I would think of that.
Yo, Hillary! Check out this story and learn how to treat those who would take a bullet for you.
According to the Washington Times article, the SS knew there was going to be trouble with the Chilean police:
In role reversal, president rescues Secret Service agent By James G. Lakely THE WASHINGTON TIMES
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041120-113709-8651r.htm.
A second SS agent who was close behind was pushed into a wall in a near headlock, and remained outside.
Can you imagine how tall Bush stands with his SS details now?
Sounds like something out of Tom Clancy.
You're welcome. Thanks again for the excellent post.
"Chilean security knew that the Secret Service always accompanies the president and knows how to identify them by the pins on their lapels, the source said, but blocked them anyway. "
It is not unreasonable to assume from the Wash. Times article that Pres. Bush was aware of the ongoing dispute with the Chilean police, and he stepped in when he saw that
they had tried to carry out their plan.
What do you take from the "sources" comment in the WTimes that he "saw it coming?" If the Chileans were adamant that they were providing the security, and the SS breached their prerogative - should we be happy, mad, sad, pi$$ed at the Chileans or pi$$ed at the Secret Service for anticipating this altercation and not informing the President of the threat?
Which I would feel a whole lot better about, if we weren't down so many Colombian and Mexican presidential candidates......
I once went to a conservative web site and a hockey game broke out.
Ha-Ha-HA
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.