THAAAAAAT'S better!
Posted on 11/20/2004 8:14:51 AM PST by Jose Roberto
I went to see the magical "Pericles'' at the Shakespeare Theater the other night.
In ancient Greece, the prince of Tyre tires of all the yes men around him. He chooses to trust the one courtier who intrepidly tells him: "They do abuse the king that flatter him. ... Whereas reproof, obedient and in order, fits kings, as they are men, for they may err.''
Not flatter the king? Listen to dissenting viewpoints? Rulers who admit they've erred?
It's all so B.C. (Before Cheney).
Now, in the 21st-century reign of King George II, flattery is mandatory, dissent is forbidden, and erring without admitting error is the best way to get ahead. President Bush is purging the naysayers who tried to temper crusted-nut-bar Dick Cheney and the neocon crazies on Iraq.
First, faith trumped facts. Now, loyalty trumps competence. W., who was the loyalty enforcer for his father's administration, is now the loyalty enforcer for his own.
Those promoted to be in charge of our security, diplomacy and civil liberties were rewarded for being more loyal to Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney than to the truth.
The president and vice president are dispatching their toadies to the agencies to quell dissent. The crackdown seems bizarre, since hardly anyone dared to disagree with them anyway and there were plenty willing to twist the truth for them.
Consider George Tenet, who assured Mr. Bush that the weak case on Iraqi W.M.D. was "a slam-dunk.'' And Colin Powell, who caved and made the bogus U.N. case for war. Then, when he wanted to stay a bit longer to explore Mideast opportunities arising from Arafat's death, he got shoved out by a president irked by the diplomat's ambivalence and popularity.
Mr. Bush prefers more panting enablers, like Alberto Gonzales. You wanna fry criminals or torture prisoners? Sure thing, boss.
W. and Vice want to extend their personal control over bureaucracies they thought had impeded their foreign policy. It's alarming to learn that they regard their first-term foreign policy - a trumped-up war and bungled occupation, an estrangement from our old allies and proliferating nuclear ambitions in North Korea, Iran and Russia - as impeded. What will an untrammeled one look like?
The post-election hubris has infected Capitol Hill. Law-and-order House Republicans changed the rules so Tom DeLay can stay as majority leader even if he's indicted; Senate Republicans are threatening to rule Democratic filibusters out of order.
In 2002, Cheney & Co. set up their own C.I.A. in the Pentagon to bypass the C.I.A. and conjure up evidence on Iraqi W.M.D. Now Mr. Cheney has sent his lackey, Porter Goss, who helped him try to suffocate the 9/11 commission, to bully the C.I.A. into falling into line.
In an ominous echo of the old loyalty oaths, Mr. Goss has warned employees at the agency that their job is to "support the administration and its policies in our work.''
Mr. Bush doesn't want any more leaks, like the one showing that he was told two months before invading Iraq that such a move could lead to violent internal conflict and more support for radical Islamists.
Mr. Goss has managed to make the dysfunctional C.I.A. even more dysfunctional. Instead of going after Al Qaeda, he's busy purging top-level officials who had been going after Al Qaeda - replacing them with his coterie of hacks from Capitol Hill.
Mr. Cheney is letting his old mentor, Rummy, stay on. What does it matter if the Rummy doctrine - dangerously thin allotments of forces, no exit strategy, snatching State Department occupation duties and then screwing them up - has botched the Iraq mission and left the military so strapped it's calling back old, out-of-shape reservists to active service?
Condi Rice and Stephen Hadley did not do their jobs before 9/11 in coordinating the fight against Al Qaeda, and they did not do their jobs after 9/11 in preventing the debacle in Iraq. They not only suppressed evidence Americans needed to know that would have debunked the neocons' hyped-up case for invading Iraq; they helped shovel hooey into the president's speeches.
Dr. Rice pitched in to help Dr. No whip up that imaginary mushroom cloud. Condi's life story may be inspirational. But the way she got the State Department job is not.
Not only are the Bush officials who failed to protect the country and misled us into war not losing their jobs. They're getting promoted.
Pretty ironic title from the queen of lib toadies.
"I went to see the magical "Pericles'' at the Shakespeare Theater the other night."
With your Mom, Mo? I find it hard to believe that any man in his right mind would squire you around town. Blech.
This woman annoys me to no end. Keep posting her articles, please! LOL!
"Bush won; therefore he should abandon his policies and appoint Democrats to his cabinet."
Have I got that right?
What do expect from a fat sleazy socialist BIMBO
What do you expect from a fat sleazy socialist BIMBO
Am I mistaken or is this not a distortion of the rankest sort? I do not have the quotation before me but my recollection is that the memo exorts the staff to refrain from leaks which would undermine the administration. And that is a pole apart.
After the Republicans faced a electoral loss in 1992, GOP leaders crafted a new, positive plan for the future. The "Contract With America" convinced some Democrat voters that the Republicans had a better vision for the future. Because the GOP turned the electoral loss of 1992 into an opportunity to persuade the other side, the GOP has controlled the House ever since 1994. That vision has led to control of the Senate and Presidency.
Democrats, such as Dowd, faced with electoral losses in 2000, 2002 and 2004 do not try to persuade Republican voters. Dowd and others malign Republicans. This is not a recipe to convince the other side to change their votes. At the rate Dowd and other Democrats are going, they will be in the minority for the foreseeable future.
You're right, Maureen. It's hopeless. All is lost. You'll never get to do a president again. Draw a bath, uncork a nice bottle of wine, light a few aromatic candles, and open a vein. Soon it will all just fade away.
Somehow we are now to believe that Bush shouldn't have a loyal cabinet, how dare he? These libs are really really wacked out and getting worse, I for one am LOVING it!
Now THAT's mean................
I love it!
Rules.
As opposed to all the other articles she writes.....?
The Libs have become almost obsessive in their attempts to get Bush to "admit" that he made some mistakes. Well, I don't recall Kerry (or any Lib) ever admitting any errors. They just blame everybody else for their mistakes.
hey Mo, STFU.
The New York Times should be vetting anything this crazy woman writes...she and Helen Thomas, and Molly Ivans, are out of control. What gives them the right to publish such slander and lies with such reckless abandon? We are to overlook their distortions because they are the "voices of women journalists"?
Well, I say STFU to them all.
hinckley buzzard wrote:
_________________________________________________________
You're right, Maureen. It's hopeless. All is lost. You'll never get to do a president again. Draw a bath, uncork a nice bottle of wine, light a few aromatic candles, and open a vein. Soon it will all just fade away.
_________________________________________________________
Perfect ending for Cleopatra Dowd seeing her Mark Anthony Kerry destroyed.
9 posted on 11/20/2004 8:22:33 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
ye gods, what a [deleted] this woman is.
Won't help. Liberal writers are like streetcorner drug dealers: Get one, and two take their place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.