1 posted on
11/17/2004 11:46:30 PM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"Alexander lived in a more honest time," Oliver Stone told Playboy magazine. In a historical first, the words "honest" and "Oliver Stone" appear in the same sentance.
I think I'll punt on seeing the grossly miscast Colin Farrell as a silly blond Alexander gayboy.
2 posted on
11/17/2004 11:51:04 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: kattracks
Early word has it that Alexander is a huge stinker. Couldn't happen to a sicker mofo than Stone.
3 posted on
11/17/2004 11:51:57 PM PST by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: kattracks
I had never seen JFK and it was on TV the other night. What a a bunch of hooey!
4 posted on
11/17/2004 11:52:53 PM PST by
msnimje
To: kattracks
>It was said ... that Alexander was never defeated, except by
>Hephaistion's thighs
Nevertheless, the Greeks were conquered by the Romans. Let's not idolize a conquered people.
5 posted on
11/17/2004 11:55:54 PM PST by
ROTB
To: kattracks
Kubrick handled this material in Spartacus with no problem, but stone has to make a spectacle of it to distract us from noticing his lack of talent.
A friend of mine works in the industry and when I asked him who he liked working with he gave me many names of folks who are very pleasant and creative to work with; I asked him who was rotten to work with and he said only one name. Guess who? He said Stone was so nasty, ignorant and credit-hogging, that he would under no circumstances work with him again.
6 posted on
11/17/2004 11:56:48 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(If it is not fearful, it is not worthwhile. - Paul Tornier)
To: kattracks
Leave it to Stone to screw up a movie about Alexander the Great. I was planning on seeing the movie, but I don't think I will now.
7 posted on
11/17/2004 11:57:29 PM PST by
Nosterrex
To: kattracks
"Alexander lived in a more honest time," Stone told Playboy magazine.... "Young boys were with boys when they wanted to be."
Pining for more honest times, Oliver?
To: kattracks
I heard Michael Medved talking about it today and he said the ads for it are very misleading.
9 posted on
11/18/2004 12:02:37 AM PST by
lara
To: kattracks
The historical Alexander was a somewhat effeminate appearing bi-sexual. It appears that Stone has portraied Alexander pretty much correctly. Just because the movie is accurate does not make it a good movie or even an interesting movie.
11 posted on
11/18/2004 12:08:18 AM PST by
Jeff Gordon
(Now is the time for all wise men to gloat. FOUR MORE YEARS,)
To: kattracks
"Alexander lived in a more honest time," Stone told Playboy magazine. "We go into his bisexuality. It may offend some people, but sexuality in those days was a different thing. Pre-Christian morality. Young boys were with boys when they wanted to be." I had no idea Oliver was that old. He appears to absolutely know this for a fact.
13 posted on
11/18/2004 12:10:34 AM PST by
ladyinred
(Congratulations President Bush! Four more years!)
To: kattracks
From the mention of the character Bagoas, it sounds like Stone based his movie on Mary Renault's excellent and thoughtful novel, THE PERSIAN BOY. Shame if the movie really is a stinker. I hate it when someone takes a great book and makes a rotten movie from it.
15 posted on
11/18/2004 12:15:26 AM PST by
Hetty_Fauxvert
(http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
To: kattracks
"Alexander lived in a more honest time, Stone told Playboy magazine. We go into his bisexuality. It may offend some people, but sexuality in those days was a different thing. Pre-Christian morality. Young boys were with boys when they wanted to be."
....and such wonderful, liberal societies no longer exist for WHAT reasons....?
17 posted on
11/18/2004 3:21:27 AM PST by
Baytovin
To: kattracks
You could not pay me to see anything with Oliver Stone's name on it. I would just assume it is full of distortion and half-truths.
18 posted on
11/18/2004 3:51:05 AM PST by
GOP_Proud
(Can I git me some morals here?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson