Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defending our marine in Fallujah (Combat Vets You Know This is True)
FrontPageMagazine.com

Posted on 11/17/2004 3:35:00 PM PST by annyokie

Defending our marine in Fallujah - Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:30 AM

The media attacks on our marine in Fallujah are more ways to get our soldiers killed. This is a guest blog by a former marine and Navy Seal, Matthew Heidt, whose blog can be found here.

Security Rounds

We're gonna see more on this issue in the near future. Most folks who've served in combat are taking a much more objective view of how things are changing w/re to the Law of Land Warfare than those who have not.

The shots fired at the "unarmed" terrorist in that mosque in Fallujah are called "security rounds." Its a safety issue pure and simple. After assaulting through a target, put a security round in everybody's head. Sorry al-Reuters, there's no paddy wagon rolling around Fallujah picking up "prisoners" and offering them a hot cup a joe, falafel, and a blanket. There's no time to dick around in the target, you clear the space, dump the chumps, and moveon.org. Are Corpsman expected to treat wounded terrorists?

Negative. Hey libs, worried about the defense budget? Well, it would be waste, fraud, and abuse for a Corpsman to spend one man minute or a battle dressing on a terrorist, its much cheaper to just spend the $.02 on a 5.56mm FMJ.

By the way, terrorists who chop off civilian's heads are not prisoners, they are carcasses.

UPDATE: Let me be very clear about this issue. I have looked around the web, and many people get this concept, but there are some stragglers. Here is your situation Marine. You just took fire from unlawful combatants shooting from a religious building attempting to use the sanctuary status of their position as protection. But you're in Fallujah now, and the Marine Corps has decided that they're not playing that game this time. That was Najaf. So you set the mosque on fire and you hose down the terrorists with small arms, launch some AT-4s (Rockets), some 40MM grenades into the building and things quiet down. So you run over there, and find some tangos wounded and pretending to be dead. You are aware that suicide martyrdom is like really popular with these kind of idiots, and like taking some Marines with them would be really cool. So you can either risk your life and your fireteam's lives by having them cover you while you bend down and search a guy that you think is pretending to be dead for some reason.

Also, you don't know who or what is in the next room, and you're already speaking English to each other and its loud because your hearing is poor from shooting people for several days. So you know that there are many other rooms to enter, and that if anyone is still alive in those rooms, they know that Americans are in the mosque. Meanwhile (3 seconds later), you still have this terrorist that was just shooting at you from a mosque playing possum. What do you do?

You double tap his head, and you go to the next room, that's what.

What about the Geneva Conventions and all that Law of Land Warfare stuff? What about it. Without even addressing the issues at hand you first thought should be, "I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6." Bear in mind that this is a perpetual mindset that in reinforced by experience on a minute by minute basis. Secondly, you are fighting an unlawful combatant in a Sanctuary which is a double No No on his part. Third, tactically you are in no position to take "prisoners" because there are more rooms to search and clear, and the behavior of said terrorist indicates that he is up to no good. No good in Fallujah is a very large place and the low end of no good and the high end of no good are fundamentally the same... Marines get hurt or die. So there is no compelling reason for you to do anything but double tap this idiot and get on with the mission.

If you are a veteran then everything I have just written is self evident, if you are not a veteran than at least try to put yourself in the situation. Remember, in Fallujah there is no yesterday, there is no tomorrow, there is only now. Right NOW. Have you ever lived in NOW for a week? It is not easy, and if you have never lived in NOW for longer than it takes to finish the big roller coaster at Six Flags, then shut your hole about putting Marines in jail for war crimes. Be advised, I am not talking to my readers, but if this post gets linked up, I want regular folks to get this message loud and clear.

http://froggyruminations.blogspot.com/

Comment by Lori Kahler

It is also important to note that there have been reports that just five minutes earlier and a block away from this incident, another wounded insurgent blew himself up. He took the life of a marine and severely wounded six other marines who were trying to give aid to this insurgent. Let us not forget that Senator Kerry received a purple heart for a very similar incident, although Kerry shot the boy in the back as he was fleeing. Not only was this marine correct in shooting the wounded insurgent, he was obligated to or risk the death or injury to whole unit.


TOPICS: Unclassified; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fallujahmarine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-132 next last
To: annyokie
Well, it would be waste, fraud, and abuse for a Corpsman to spend one man minute or a battle dressing on a terrorist, its much cheaper to just spend the $.02 on a 5.56mm FMJ.

I find this shocking.

.

.

.

.

Only 2 cents a cartridge?

61 posted on 11/17/2004 4:28:06 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Has Sties got FRAGED yet.


62 posted on 11/17/2004 4:28:16 PM PST by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
"I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6."

Pretty much covers it. I would NEVER turn my back on a terrorist, percievably unarmed and wounded or not. He did right by snuffing the SOB and shouldn't have been put in the position to protect a mosque that was being used as an enemy fortification anyway. The damned place should have been leveled.

63 posted on 11/17/2004 4:28:40 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I would like to add one more thing. Whenever we are doing something successful, like cleaning out that cesspool in Falluja, the media strives to fimd a dark cloud to put in front of the bright lining.

We need to take them on and give them a spanking like Rather got. The internet is more powerful than the mass media.

64 posted on 11/17/2004 4:30:38 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Man, I know little about combat stuff, but I sure support these guys doing their jobs.

And doin' a dam* good job, too, from what I have seen!


65 posted on 11/17/2004 4:33:04 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Pastnowfuturealpha

that would be my guess. wouldn't put it past them.


66 posted on 11/17/2004 4:33:21 PM PST by Zeppelin (Going to war without the French is like going hunting without an accordian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jocko12

In English please.


67 posted on 11/17/2004 4:34:03 PM PST by BykrBayb (5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 am EDT, until she's safe. http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
It is also important to note that there have been reports that just five minutes earlier and a block away from this incident, another wounded insurgent blew himself up. He took the life of a marine and severely wounded six other marines who were trying to give aid to this insurgent.

That's what happened in the early stages of battle during the Guadalcanal campaign .
After that it was a whole new attitude when encountering the Japs
68 posted on 11/17/2004 4:35:56 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Got that right - but remember - they also allowed one to remain as President - Dog Clinton - What he gave China and other nations is coming back at us soon - Just hope we have what it takes to answer -


I know we won the election - and should be happy - but we can't wait too long before taking down the major media - I believe we can do it - CBS is way down because of what they tried to do - I suggest some kind of plan to work against the rest of the corrupt media - What ever it takes - They are keeping this nation down in a time of war - No nation needs that -

They(media outlets) are getting nasty - just like in the 1960s - and it must not happen again - in my opinion -


69 posted on 11/17/2004 4:36:40 PM PST by Pastnowfuturealpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate; All
 Another SAS defends marine  It's absolutely standard practice for securing captured ground - learned through bitter experience of losing men through having enemy combatants get up and run away or start shooting at you again.  War is a cold-blooded business, and I think people need to wrap their heads around that concept.
SAS ace defends trooper (“Every soldier has a right to defend himself")


70 posted on 11/17/2004 4:39:26 PM PST by backhoe (Just a Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the Trackball into the Dawn of Information...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

"English "

well, English I think it would be fragged, rather than fraged, as it is the double consonant which goes with the short vowel; and the single consonant which goes with the long vowel.

It is IOW fragged, rhymes with, hmmm.. bagged.

It is Viet Nam era term for what disgruntled troops did to their unpopular LTs -- roll a fragmentation grenade under his bunk . . .

it is not a term of endearment . . .


71 posted on 11/17/2004 4:39:27 PM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Here's the deal, folks. Unfortunately, according to the current rules of engagement, this Marine is probably going to be prosecuted. Engaging a wounded, unarmed man showing no more hostile intent than playing dead is simply not authorzied.

I'm not talking about what is common sense, or using any sense of perspective. I'm talking about the rules of engagement, i.e. the current law of warfare for servicemembers in Iraq. According to the letter of that law, the Marine engaged the man without sufficient cause.

Quoting the Geneva Conventions, or recounting what pops did in WWII has zero bearing on this. I'm telling you this as someone who was there and knows the score. As reasonable as his actions may have been, the military is very likely going to make a harsh example out of this guy.

72 posted on 11/17/2004 4:45:02 PM PST by Steel Wolf (There's only three kinds of people in this world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AMDG&BVMH; jocko12

That was my guess, but I'm still stymied on "Sties." What, or who, is that? And why would this person be asking me such a question?


73 posted on 11/17/2004 4:45:08 PM PST by BykrBayb (5 minutes of prayer for Terri, every day at 11 am EDT, until she's safe. http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

"until she's safe"

Bless you for that.

As for the rest, you got me! ;)


74 posted on 11/17/2004 4:48:50 PM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife; JediForce

>>>>Our soldier did nothing wrong. I don't care what armchair soldier you hear saying he did. He had been shot in the face the day before. He lost a friend the day before.>>>>

If I may say so,it was in the middle of a mop up operations....they could have walked to the injured man and in a matter of seconds,they could have been blasted with the reporter filming.Difficult to see the future is in Iraq.....Our only other choice is to push for the election of an Iraqi President,a strong President,one who will not let our tragedy continue....


75 posted on 11/17/2004 4:50:05 PM PST by Senator_Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

If they are still twitching, you shoot them till they stop.

What do they want us to do? Rush to the 'poor wounded terrorist's side" and try to understand why he just fragged your squad?

Shoot the bastard, and make sure he has stopped jerking, or that next 'twitch' might be the pin popping on another grendade clenched firmly between his cheeks.

What is so hard for folks to understand about kill, or be killed in wartime? I just don't get why this is an issue. of course, neither does the USMJ... and that will be the end of it.


76 posted on 11/17/2004 4:52:30 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

I'm not a combat veteran. I hold them several steps up up the ladder from me. I was active duty U. S. Air Force from Feburary 1970 to August 1977. Our guys in Iraq are on my mind twentyfour/seven. I signed the petition, called the Commandant of the USMC and talked with public relations, called both of my Senators. They are Voinich and Dewine. How much they will do I don't know. I hope a lot more people will call them. I will keep after this with any ammunition I think of or find out from all of you.


77 posted on 11/17/2004 4:52:54 PM PST by JOE43270 (JOE43270 America voted and said we are One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Did you see what #20 put - and signed it John Q Citizen -

This has nothing to do with lowering the standards to that of a terrorist - but everything to do with fighting a war against those kind of people called "terrorist" and what it takes to stay alive and keep this nation safe from their ilk -

Some people's children - Grrrrr - On the good side - over 4000 people have posted so far and the people with common sense are way ahead of jerks like #20 -


78 posted on 11/17/2004 4:54:03 PM PST by Pastnowfuturealpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Here's a good comparison for you. The very first thing a new EMT is taught about responding on scene is to remove any and all threats to their safety (ie. guns, knives, etec).

Even EMT's know that you remove the threat first and treat the wounded second. This Marine removed a threat.

79 posted on 11/17/2004 4:54:27 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

ping


80 posted on 11/17/2004 4:59:07 PM PST by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson