Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There was an earlier report that Nelson would be asked to switch parties, and stay in the Senate but that if he did so it would have to include an agreement that Jophanns not run against him in the GOP primary in 2006.

Either option seems a good bet for Nelson..If he runs as a Dem..it'd be hard race, no guarantee of winning, and even if he won..he'd only have another 6 years in the minority to look forward to..

Sounds to me like Rove is either trying to bump up the GOP numbers..56 sounds better than 55, or possibly stock the larder in case there's a defection or two in the near future..in either case..getting Nelson OUT, and getting a conservative GOP in the Senate seat makes a lot of sense NOW..

1 posted on 11/17/2004 1:01:51 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: ken5050

Specter Insurance:^/.....


2 posted on 11/17/2004 1:03:34 PM PST by Red Badger (Give someone enough EU-ROPE and they will hang themselves......out of pure frustration......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Rove is brilliant. Maybe he can add another GOP seat to the Senate. And who cares about Ag!


3 posted on 11/17/2004 1:04:05 PM PST by bushisdamanin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Well did he accept it?


4 posted on 11/17/2004 1:04:08 PM PST by Greg the Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Yep....good assessment, ken. And Ag is a great shelf on which to set anyone aside, while making them feel good about it.


5 posted on 11/17/2004 1:04:15 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

is the gov in Nebraska (R), I assume?


6 posted on 11/17/2004 1:04:38 PM PST by KeatsforFirstDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

This is a brilliant move...IF Nelson accepts the post. Does Nebraska have a GOP governor (I assume they do). The GOP could just appoint a Pubbie Senator in Nelson's spot. Watch them whine and cry about it, but notice how not a peep was made when Zell Miller was installed in Georgia.


8 posted on 11/17/2004 1:05:19 PM PST by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

We need three or four more "Rove" clones working in the top ranks of the party. On the other hand, the libs are getting easier to beat since they are losing control faster than we can keep track of....ala the latest sliming of Condi Rice which was one of the MOST STUPID THINGS THE RADICAL MSM COULD HAVE DONE....

Go Rove! Too bad Zell Miller will not switch...or maybe after today, he might...


9 posted on 11/17/2004 1:06:20 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
Excellent strategery. Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore did this a few years ago, appointing two Democrat state senators to cabinet positions. The GOP picked up both seats in special elections.

I'm pretty sure Nelson has a conservative record on agriculture issues. He would be a fine choice for USDA.

10 posted on 11/17/2004 1:07:12 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers (Proud Reagan Alumna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Is a Cabinet post Rove's to offer?


11 posted on 11/17/2004 1:07:41 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

I think Rove is facing some possible defections from the GOP - as well as wants to remove the Dems from putting a more centrist face on their leadership.

I wouldn't say the Dems will be in the minority for the next ten years, though. We have at least two years - but I think the numbrs (as far as re-elections) are stacked in the Dems favor in 2006.


12 posted on 11/17/2004 1:07:51 PM PST by graf008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Alright, I'm feeling pretty proud right now. I suggested this idea on an earlier post here two days ago: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1280539/posts (see #10)

Either 1) Karl Rove and I think alike or 2) Karl Rove reads FR and liked my idea. : ) Either way, not too bad! lol


15 posted on 11/17/2004 1:08:05 PM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
Also, according to TNR, Lieberman is a possibility to take over from Rumsfeld.

But with Powell's departure, what members of the Bush team knew as soon as the first shot was fired in the Iraq war became apparent to the nation at large: The argument has been settled in the latter's favor. Not because of the Pentagon's bureaucratic weight (Rumsfeld and the neoconservatives around him will be departing soon enough--replaced, in all likelihood, by a Senator, perhaps even Joe Lieberman).

[SNIP]

Nor will the expected departure of Rumsfeld and his lieutenants at the Defense Department dilute the president's robust foreign policy preferences. Were a Joe Lieberman or, by an outside chance, Paul Wolfowitz catapulted to the top Pentagon post, the new defense secretary may end up promoting an even more aggressive foreign policy stance than the president himself. But, even at the cabinet level, ideology's no longer the point.


TNR
17 posted on 11/17/2004 1:08:10 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
Incumbency often translates into sufficient name recognition to give the incumbent a few points on election day. If Nelson is Secretary of Agriculture and Governor Johanns appoints himself to finish out the last two years of Nelson's term, Johanns becomes the incumbent with no strong challenger on the horizon.

In addition, if Nelson decides to become Secretary of Agriculture, the Senate becomes:
Republicans: 56
Democrats: 42
Independents: 1

18 posted on 11/17/2004 1:08:16 PM PST by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
It was long rumored that Nelson was going to switch.

I am wondering too if Breaux will become Energy Secretary.

There are good people who can serve their country well and I welcome them.

19 posted on 11/17/2004 1:08:39 PM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR POWERS EQUAL TO THE TASKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Couple points: First, John Breaux was offered Secretary of Energy 4 years ago, but turned it down since he would have been replaced by a Republican. There was tremendous pressure applied to him by the Democratic Party not to take the job because the Senate was 50-50 at that time.

Second, by making it sound like a Rove idea, CNN has pretty much guaranteed that the Dems will put a tremendous amount of pressure on Nelson not to take the job.


21 posted on 11/17/2004 1:09:31 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

I think he should offer it to Senator Tim Johnson(D), so that Governor Rounds can appoint Larry Diedrich to the Senate. Getting rid of two rat Senators in SD in a matter of weeks would be too much to ask?


26 posted on 11/17/2004 1:11:29 PM PST by SoDak (Home of Senator John Thune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

You gotta admire Judy Woodruf for carrying on so bravely while in the throes of an advanced case of PEST.


29 posted on 11/17/2004 1:12:14 PM PST by Savage Beast (My parents, grandparents, and great grandparents were all Democrats.My children are all Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

If he takes it this would be the perfect time to reign in the moderates. Specter included.


35 posted on 11/17/2004 1:15:30 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

2 simple words...Tom Osborn.


40 posted on 11/17/2004 1:18:49 PM PST by MahaMarty (Election Night! Enter Right! Take my hand!!! Off to Ronald Reagan Land!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Even if we lose a couple seats in the Senate in 2006, we still have a majority! I don't agree with the analysis that we are exposed in 2006. I think we will pick up 1 or 2 seats in 2006 but even if we lose we still control the Senate.


56 posted on 11/17/2004 1:24:25 PM PST by milltech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson