Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb

Well, knowing the liberal press, I would just guess the latter! You can just know that it was not meant to be a positive image of her OR the president!


73 posted on 11/17/2004 10:07:03 AM PST by luvie (WE DID NOT WAVER; WE DID NOT TIRE; WE DID NOT FALTER; AND WE DID NOT FAIL!! GWB WON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: LUV W

If this racist, sexist hate speech were published about a Democrat, there'd be rioting in the streets. Hate speech is NOT protected under the First Amendment.


156 posted on 11/17/2004 11:05:03 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson