Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax-law rewrite has key skeptic [Grassley, R-IA says comprehensive tax reform "difficult" to do]
Yahoo ^ | Nov 17, 2004 | Peronet Despeignes

Posted on 11/17/2004 6:51:52 AM PST by Mike Fieschko

The Senate's top tax-writer expressed doubts Tuesday about prospects for a major overhaul of the tax code, dealing a blow to one of President Bush (news - web sites)'s top priorities two weeks after his re-election.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said comprehensive tax reform would be "difficult" to do. "I'm not one to spend a lot of time tilting at windmills," he said.

Grassley said Bush would have to aggressively use his "bully pulpit" to win wider popular support. After the election, Bush said he had earned "political capital, and now I intend to spend it" by pushing for changes in the tax code and Social Security (news - web sites), among other things. But Grassley said, "I'm not sure how much political capital (the president) is prepared to spend on it."

Grassley's view is important because all tax bills go through his committee. In an interview with USA TODAY, he said Bush made a mistake by not talking about tax reform more often and more explicitly in the campaign. "I think there was a missed opportunity," he said.

White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan said Bush "talked daily during the campaign about the importance of making the tax code simpler, fairer and more conducive to economic growth, and he looks forward to working with Congress on this priority."

Bush has called for simplifying the tax code in a "neutral" way that would not significantly raise or reduce tax revenue. That could make changes tougher, because any big tax cuts for some would have to be paid for with increases for others, creating winners and losers.

The White House is assembling a bipartisan panel that's expected to make recommendations before Bush settles on a specific proposal next year. Among his options is the replacement of the progressive income tax with a single, "flat" income tax rate or retail sales tax.

Grassley suggested that he favors more incremental changes: making the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent, closing loopholes, shielding middle-income Americans from tax increases, and reducing the tax burden on savings and investment.

The last time Congress overhauled the tax code was in 1986 under President Reagan. That law broadened the tax base by slashing loopholes. It collapsed 15 income tax brackets, topped by a 50% rate, into two rates of 15% and 28%. Since then, new tax breaks have been added and the number of brackets raised to six, topped by a 35% rate.



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: rino; sellout; taxes; taxreform; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2004 6:51:52 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko; Don'tMessWithTexas; Baron 2A; sarasota; babaloo; ibahawk; Eric in the Ozarks; ...

Iowa Ping List!
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added or removed from this list.


2 posted on 11/17/2004 6:53:32 AM PST by RushCrush (I Heart Halliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
comprehensive tax reform would be "difficult" to do

Well, we can't attempt to do anything Difficult, can we? Might damage our self-esteem. Incremental changes are definitely better. (/sarcasm)

I've decided I really dislike this man!

3 posted on 11/17/2004 6:54:21 AM PST by Tax-chick (The whole world has gone crazy. Their beebers are stuned and there's no turning back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Misleading headline. Not unusual for Yahoo.

He is saying it will be hard, but can be done. So what is new in DC?

Politics is the art of the possible, unless you are Ronald Reagan. Then anything is possible.


4 posted on 11/17/2004 6:55:30 AM PST by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Grassley is a very fair and smart guy. Sounds like his interview was excerpted by this MSM rat.


5 posted on 11/17/2004 6:55:48 AM PST by RushCrush (I Heart Halliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
This A$$hole needs to be fired and another Chairman appointed.
No more naysayers - put someone in who's attitude is, "We can do this", then get out of his/her way.
6 posted on 11/17/2004 6:55:51 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

I can see where Grassley is coming from. I'd like a simpler tax code but I also like deducting mortgage interest, 401k, state/local income tax, my employer health plan premiums, public transit fare, and child tax credits.


7 posted on 11/17/2004 6:57:47 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Difficult to appease the trial and tax lawyers, put them all out of work, they don't want to touch this bureaucrat's tax code, too many fat cat jobs at risk.


8 posted on 11/17/2004 6:57:51 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said comprehensive tax reform would be "difficult" to do. "I'm not one to spend a lot of time tilting at windmills," he said.

Then resign your post 'Sancho Panza'.

Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!

9 posted on 11/17/2004 7:00:28 AM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
Sounds like his interview was excerpted by this MSM rat.

Thanks for the reminder ... sometimes I forget about that stuff!

10 posted on 11/17/2004 7:00:54 AM PST by Tax-chick (The whole world has gone crazy. Their beebers are stuned and there's no turning back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

What is so difficult??? Shut down the IRS, stop collecting income/payroll tax and replace it with either a flat tax or federal sales tax. Sounds simple to me.


11 posted on 11/17/2004 7:04:27 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Bush has called for simplifying the tax code in a "neutral" way that would not significantly raise or reduce tax revenue. That could make changes tougher, because any big tax cuts for some would have to be paid for with increases for others, creating winners and losers.

The losers would scream bloody murder. The only way to do it is to ram it through with bipartisan support, much like Reagan did with Rostenkowski in his second term. The actual tax plan that became law then was very close to Bradley-Gephardt, and Bill Bradley was the biggest booster of the plan in the Senate.

If people want radical reform, like a flat tax, there would be hugh and series winners and losers! The way to get radical reform through is a gradual phase-in, maybe five or even ten years.

The biggest problem is corporate taxes. We have higher corporate taxes than almost every other country in the world. That's just plain foolish, and it hurts our economy. Unfortunately, hating Big Business is not just a touchstone for the Left; there are some on the Right who also feel that way.

12 posted on 11/17/2004 7:08:47 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
The Senate's top tax-writer expressed doubts Tuesday about prospects for a major overhaul of the tax code, dealing a blow to one of President Bush (news - web sites)'s top priorities two weeks after his re-election.

Oh well, we may as well give up now. Its over, scrap the plan, Yahoo! says so. Without Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa were doomed. I mean, there are only going to be 53 other Republicans and a couple of conservative DIMs to deal with and forget it. It wont be a fair fight with us possibly losing 1 Senator. Help, were drowning.

In other news: Man will not go to the moon, Man will not fly, Man will not cure Polio, and Man will not break the 4 minute mile because it is too hard and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa says it is impossible.

13 posted on 11/17/2004 7:09:34 AM PST by frog_jerk_2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene
What is so difficult??? Shut down the IRS, stop collecting income/payroll tax and replace it with either a flat tax or federal sales tax. Sounds simple to me.

What would the level of the flat tax or sales tax need to be to offset the loss of all income and payroll taxes? Who would be the winners and losers under your plan?

14 posted on 11/17/2004 7:10:33 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard" John F. Kennedy

We need fewer "visionaries" like Grassley.

15 posted on 11/17/2004 7:11:53 AM PST by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

The reason it is "difficult" is because of all the interests whose oxen will be gored, not the least of which are the legislators themselves. It's a big bag of candy that they get to dole out in return for payoffs that they call campaign contributions. Please also keep in mind the "tax simplification" scheme in which they took away deductions helpful to the middle class (credit card debt, medical expenses, etc.) in return for lower rates and then, just as quickly as possible, raised the rates but did not reinstitute the deductions.


16 posted on 11/17/2004 7:13:36 AM PST by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
Grassley is a very fair and smart guy. Sounds like his interview was excerpted by this MSM rat.

Then Grassley needs to be out there RIGHT NOW screaming to the MSM lowlife about mischaracterizing what he said.

17 posted on 11/17/2004 7:15:22 AM PST by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
This is nothing but MSM trying to divide the Republicans since they know the Republicans can pretty much do what they want to now. The MSM is desperately trying to work hard for the Liberals. This is noting, but a piece of garbage.
18 posted on 11/17/2004 7:17:37 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Wow, a US Senator that would fight to protect ethanol subsidies 'till his dying breath is, *gasp*, skeptical about making real reforms?

Color me unsurprised.

19 posted on 11/17/2004 7:18:00 AM PST by LincolnLover (Now comes the revolution. If you don't implement a conservative agenda now, when do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Is this guy a "lawyer" perchance? I bet he is!

Lawyers have all but destroyed this country - we must return the favor.


20 posted on 11/17/2004 7:18:33 AM PST by steplock (http://www.outoftimeradio.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson