Posted on 11/16/2004 1:07:33 PM PST by nothernlights
Was not the reporter under the duty to hand over this tape to military authorities,under the rules of imbeds? If that's the case then strong measures should be taken against Sites. Also has Sites been removed from that Marine unit,because at this point i"m sure his presence is a distraction to the Marines and therefore endangers their lives. Sites has to be removed from that unit at the very least.
Later.
looks that way, sho'nuff.
iheartconservatism Is still hiding. Last seen on 284. See if you can smoke em out. I think I skeeert the poop out of him so nothing was left.
Hmmmm.. catnip..
*jingle jingle*
What's with the bells I keep hearing?!
I challenged me and ran away. Typical Liberal Bluster.
Trust us to run across a troll who's sceered...
ROTFLOL!!
So THAT was what that green haze was!
Whew! Glad I missed it when I did!
Ya'll boo-ed 'em off, didn't ya?!?
Takes all the fun right out of a troll when they leave mad...;-)
I didn't know he'd be upset about having his patwiotithm quethtioned..
*chuckle*
(For some reason.. he reminded me of Weasel Clark.)
Howdy KP!
He's a littly girly man.
OK, please show legal cause to arrest him--cite the specific statute he's guilty of violating.
I tried every approach to get him to respond. He hides in fear biting his toenails and picking his nose. Chickentroll.
He'd need four promotions to be a girlyman.
Right - he is still single cell.
True. But journalists used to have war footage and even cables or dispatches approved. Before Nam most were patriotic enough that it wasn't a big deal. This scum bucket has done nothing but fuel the Jihad fire. And the MSM is using the incident to damn our soldiers. Had I been through what this Marine had been through and knowing what they have faced every day, I'd have emptied my clip into a moving terrorist scumbag.
So I'll go to the original secondary offer, let Kevin Sites join his heroes the terrorists and film their happy exploits.
Free floating sub atomic particle.
From the DOD rules for embedded reporters...
3.R. There is no general review process for media products. See para 6.A. for further detail concerning security at the source.
This whole thread was premised, 400+ posts ago, on the goofy notion that: "Was not the reporter under the duty to hand over this tape to military authorities,under the rules of imbeds?". Well, it is now conclusively established that there are no such rules for embeds.
--Boot Hill
"Used to" isn't good enough.
I know there are no rules. There is discretion. There should be no embeds. But I am not the DOD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.