Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conspiracy Guy
Is, are, who cares. Sites should be arrested or allowed to go join his heroes the terrorist.

OK, please show legal cause to arrest him--cite the specific statute he's guilty of violating.

412 posted on 11/18/2004 2:30:46 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah; Darksheare

True. But journalists used to have war footage and even cables or dispatches approved. Before Nam most were patriotic enough that it wasn't a big deal. This scum bucket has done nothing but fuel the Jihad fire. And the MSM is using the incident to damn our soldiers. Had I been through what this Marine had been through and knowing what they have faced every day, I'd have emptied my clip into a moving terrorist scumbag.

So I'll go to the original secondary offer, let Kevin Sites join his heroes the terrorists and film their happy exploits.


416 posted on 11/18/2004 2:51:22 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah; Conspiracy Guy; nothernlights
Let's put this silly crap to bed, once and for all.

From the DOD rules for embedded reporters...

3.R. There is no general review process for media products. See para 6.A. for further detail concerning security at the source.

This whole thread was premised, 400+ posts ago, on the goofy notion that: "Was not the reporter under the duty to hand over this tape to military authorities,under the rules of imbeds?". Well, it is now conclusively established that there are no such rules for embeds.

--Boot Hill

418 posted on 11/18/2004 2:54:57 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah

for the sake of discussion, let us consider the death of the irregular fighter to be a war crime.
This is what the UN, EU, and assorted a$$holes-other choose to call it, so let us run with it.

There were three people directly involved:
1. The irregular fighter
2. The Marine
3. Kevin Sites

I find it interesting that Sites is a known anti-war activist...
was in the room at the right time, camera rolling...
apparently KNEW the bldg had been cleared by another group of Marines...
yet neglected to inform the incoming troops of this datum.

It seems to me that, if a war crime has been committed, the perpertator is Mr. Sites: knowingly permitting and contributing to the death-by-gunfire of a wounded and incapacitated hostile for the purposes of garnering ratings, fame, and furtherance of his anti-war/anti-American agenda.

Mr. Sites and his "negligence" should be investigated at least as rigorously as those of the gunner. Indeed, I am of the opinion that the Marine is utterly blameless in this incident.

That's the way I see it.


438 posted on 11/18/2004 4:08:25 PM PST by King Prout (tagline under reconstruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson