Can the Pentagon charge Kevin Sites?

To: Conspiracy Guy

Or study hall is over.

301 posted on 11/18/2004 10:54:12 AM PST by Laura Earl (1/2way290)

To: Conspiracy Guy

I think he's back.. renamed in an attempt to throw us off.
*snort*
None too clever though.

302 posted on 11/18/2004 10:54:49 AM PST by Darksheare (X)The belled one (X)

To: Conspiracy Guy; iheartconservatism

What's the matter? Cat got your brain?
You scared him away, CG. He is a scaredy cat.

303 posted on 11/18/2004 10:57:01 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)

To: iheartconservatism; Conspiracy Guy

Hey, I love conservatism as much as the next guy

iheartconservatism

Your gimmick is extremely transparent, troll. Go away.

304 posted on 11/18/2004 10:59:07 AM PST by TBarnett34 ("Unnngh!" -John F'n Kerry, 11/2/04)

To: MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy

I love that little orange kitty...can I keep it???

305 posted on 11/18/2004 10:59:23 AM PST by Laura Earl (1/2way290)

What a great phoe toe:)

306 posted on 11/18/2004 11:01:11 AM PST by international american (GOD BLESS OUR VETERANS! LAND OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE!!)

307 posted on 11/18/2004 11:01:12 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)

308 posted on 11/18/2004 11:02:19 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)

309 posted on 11/18/2004 11:02:38 AM PST by TBarnett34 ("Unnngh!" -John F'n Kerry, 11/2/04)

310 posted on 11/18/2004 11:03:56 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)

This thread has a nest of trolls in it.

311 posted on 11/18/2004 11:04:33 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)

I love that little orange kitty...can I keep it???
Sure. Whatcha gonna call him??

312 posted on 11/18/2004 11:04:40 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)

To: MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy

313 posted on 11/18/2004 11:05:19 AM PST by Laura Earl (1/2way290)

To: international american

314 posted on 11/18/2004 11:05:31 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)

To: iheartconservatism; iheartusa; TBarnett34

He's "iheartusa" retread.
The post where "iheartusa" admitted being a troll has finally been pulled.
*grrr*
BUT, I'm sure the admin would LOVE checking this guy out.

315 posted on 11/18/2004 11:05:54 AM PST by Darksheare (X)The belled one (X)

To: Conspiracy Guy

316 posted on 11/18/2004 11:06:00 AM PST by Laura Earl (1/2way290)

317 posted on 11/18/2004 11:06:09 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)

318 posted on 11/18/2004 11:09:23 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)

To: Conspiracy Guy; tsr_dog

He's dead, Jim!!
tsr_dog:

319 posted on 11/18/2004 11:09:24 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)

"So what does that say about the beliefs of those who wanted this deed concealed? Do they really believe their own claims that the Marine was right in doing this? Or is their opposition to the tape being shown rooted in a subconscious belief that the Marine was in the wrong?

I am a couple of days late to this post but hey..

You have made some very good points. I think that people here are upset because the images have already clearly been used to impact public opinion.

More importantly, the Al Jazeera tactic of playing the images repeatedly can only be for one purpose and that is to incite and motivate more jihadists. THAT is something that we certainly do not need.

Personally, I think that such a tactic would be effective in motivating people to action and/or support of action. As far as I am concerned the images of 9-11 should never be allowed to leave the public consciousness. The Old Media has tried to do (and has been effective) that since the first week or so after the attacks.

These new images are clearly going to be used as propaganda for a good while to come. Reporters such as Sites have an agenda and they are not objective. That is quite obvious and it is pissing a lot of people off. I don't think that he should be executed, but his embedded status should be reconsidered, especially if he has been contributing to anti war web sites or such things similar.

320 posted on 11/18/2004 11:09:43 AM PST by Radix (Will the last person out please turn off the Tag Lines?)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794