Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drilling approved for Alaska oil reserve
CNN ^ | Monday, November 15, 2004

Posted on 11/15/2004 6:52:19 AM PST by ZGuy

The U.S. Interior Department on Friday gave final approval to a plan to develop five tracts around the oil-rich Alpine field on Alaska's North Slope.

The department's Bureau of Land Management authorized the first commercial development of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska.

Production from these fields, which together hold more than 330 million barrels of oil, will start by 2006. They will supplement production from the Alpine fields, which hold 429 million barrels and have a daily oil output of about 100,000 barrels.

Environmentalists have criticized the plan to develop these Alpine satellite fields as a rollback of environmental protections promised during the Clinton administration.

The Bush administration believes the new Congress next year will approve oil drilling in the separate Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which may hold up to 16 billion barrels of crude.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2004 6:52:20 AM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Uh-oh, Libs are going to need more therapy.


2 posted on 11/15/2004 6:54:17 AM PST by mlbford2 ("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Finally. Sanity prevails. I can hardly wait to hear what the Envirowackos have to say about this. They'll be running up there, chaining themselves to everything in sight. Should be amusing...


3 posted on 11/15/2004 6:54:20 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

So we've all had enough of $2 a gallon?


4 posted on 11/15/2004 6:55:18 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Stupid Dems holding up Bush's energy bill. If they had passed it way back in 2001, gas prices would've been around a buck now.


5 posted on 11/15/2004 6:55:23 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Are we going to develop the Alaska desert??

Pray for W and Our Troops

6 posted on 11/15/2004 6:55:47 AM PST by bray (Nam Vets Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Was this field once known as the Naval Reserve ?


7 posted on 11/15/2004 6:55:48 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
Oh boy, the enviros are going to explode over this......
8 posted on 11/15/2004 6:57:25 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2

"Uh-oh, Libs are going to need more therapy."

HAHA.. but aren't our guys getting killed in Iraq for oil? Why would we need to drill in Alaska when we're fighting a war for oil now?

*Saracasm*


9 posted on 11/15/2004 6:58:44 AM PST by Matttheconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

We need to build more refineries too!


10 posted on 11/15/2004 6:59:45 AM PST by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

They'll be running up there, chaining themselves to everything in sight. Should be amusing...

What's up there besides snow?


11 posted on 11/15/2004 7:02:15 AM PST by momf ((Immigrant = came the correct way; IIlegal = criminal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Sanity here. When are they going to approve and install a natural gas line along side of the oil pipeline? It's been blocked by "our representatives" since the original line went in. BTW, natural gas is the feedstock for a LOT of our petrochem industry....a lower NG price makes the US more competitive.


12 posted on 11/15/2004 7:02:41 AM PST by Johnny Crab (Always thankful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Yet another one of Bubba's mistakes corrected. Go, Mr. President, go!


13 posted on 11/15/2004 7:05:21 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel ("Nature abhors a moron."-H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Crab

I think someone in the NG field should propose to do this. NG is a big deal now. I know Evergreen Resourses pulled a lot of their well guys out of southern CO to go to AK. Perhaps that's the start of what you're talking about.


14 posted on 11/15/2004 7:05:37 AM PST by Matttheconservative (Semper Fidelis 1775 was a good year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
They'll be running up there, chaining themselves to everything in sight.

I suggest they find some pictures of the terrain before they bother with carrying chains all the way to ANWR.

There is nothing there but a solid sheet of ice which is dark 6 months of the year. Trees have a very hard time growing in ice instead of soil.

15 posted on 11/15/2004 7:07:50 AM PST by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

They should be drilled, but then capped for quick access. Rather than allow the oil to be released into the general supply we should keep them as a real reserve. The mere existance of the ability to bring them online quickly will serve to check overseas prices. Overseas producers drop prices primarily to inhibit the capitalization of exploration and developement costs (i.e. they keep prices up, but as soon as they sense a move toward alternate sources they'll boost production to protect their market share).


16 posted on 11/15/2004 7:08:13 AM PST by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momf

Frozen lefties, soon...


17 posted on 11/15/2004 7:08:52 AM PST by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I can hardly wait to hear what the Envirowackos have to say about this. They'll be running up there, chaining themselves to everything in sight. Should be amusing...

I hope they get gored by an ungrateful carribou.

18 posted on 11/15/2004 7:10:13 AM PST by wizardoz (straight, sedentary, and average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
"Production from these fields, which together hold more than 330 million barrels of oil, will start by 2006."

Doesn't the U.S. consume about 220 million barrels a month? Something seems off.

19 posted on 11/15/2004 7:13:20 AM PST by doodles2 (Pigtails too tight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

"They should be drilled, but then capped for quick access. Rather than allow the oil to be released into the general supply we should keep them as a real reserve. The mere existance of the ability to bring them online quickly will serve to check overseas prices. Overseas producers drop prices primarily to inhibit the capitalization of exploration and developement costs (i.e. they keep prices up, but as soon as they sense a move toward alternate sources they'll boost production to protect their market share)."

This is a good point; I agree with you. It would serve our purposes just as well (we'd get the prices on crude we could work with) while at the same time we wouldn't actually be using our oil supply.


20 posted on 11/15/2004 7:13:55 AM PST by Matttheconservative (Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson