To: ProtectOurFreedom
They have foster kids at age 17 in CA? Why not just legally emancipate the kid?
41 posted on
11/14/2004 10:55:32 AM PST by
valkyrieanne
(card-carrying South Park Republican)
To: valkyrieanne
They have foster kids at age 17 in CA? Why not just legally emancipate the kid? Because if he were emancipated, he'd have to deal with real life and knock off this silly "gender exploration" nonsense. The Liberals here won't stand for that.
To: valkyrieanne
They have foster kids at age 17 in CA? Why not just legally emancipate the kid? I was a foster kid in California at 17. It happens.
53 posted on
11/14/2004 11:15:53 AM PST by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(The key to a nice-looking lawn is a good mower. I recommend one who is muscular and shirtless)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson