Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Author's e-mail:

wclark@wesleykclark.com


Dear Wes,

Kerry lost. Go away.

Signed, America

1 posted on 11/13/2004 9:45:06 AM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pokey78

When it suits the slimes, they actually do describe the enemy accurately...

"There's no uniformed enemy force, no headquarters, no central command complex for U.S. troops to occupy and win. At the end, there will be no surrender."

But they do so with the express purpose of demoralizing Americans and the troops.


2 posted on 11/13/2004 9:48:17 AM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Hey, Wes. STFU. Your days of bombing Christian civilians in Europe is over. Maybe the KLA needs an air force. You could sign up with them.


3 posted on 11/13/2004 9:49:24 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I hate it when a "has been" thinks he's a "still is".


4 posted on 11/13/2004 9:50:33 AM PST by downwithsocialism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

On the one hand, you have to wonder if Clark ever actually was in the military. On the other hand, given the way he offers encouragement and expresses confidence in that same military, I guess it isn't a surprise that he is a Kerry devotee.


7 posted on 11/13/2004 9:52:22 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Wesley Clarks' INCOMPETENCE nearly started WWIII (or four depending on your view).

It was only when subordinates REFUSED TO OBEY HIM that desaster was avoided. He is just frank burns with a better taylor.


8 posted on 11/13/2004 9:53:14 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

The outcome of the battle is simple to predict.

As long as there are strong leaders like Bush and NOT brown nosing fops like Wesley Clark and John F'ing Kerry running the show, we will win.
IMHO


9 posted on 11/13/2004 9:54:40 AM PST by A Real Dan Fan... NOT (Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate sumb*tch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Very funny.

I hear he and Ashcroft will be singing a duet.


10 posted on 11/13/2004 9:55:16 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

In my opinion, if we've made mistakes in Iraq, it's pussyfooting around.
Why did we give Falujah several weeks of advance notice? Why not ring the place with tanks and troops and prevent anyone from leaving? Without notice?
When the bodies were burned on the bridge, the bridge should have ceased to exist an hour later. Falujah should have been attacked within 24 hours.
Our troops suffer because of this ridiculous effort to 'win hearts and minds' and to reach a diplomatic solution. There can be NO diplomatic solutions with terrorists.


11 posted on 11/13/2004 9:55:37 AM PST by Imnotalib (Kerry-Edwards=Liar-thief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Clark is a sore looserman and still thinks he has a chance

in 08,what a dreamer....
13 posted on 11/13/2004 10:00:22 AM PST by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Just as every Ann Coulter thread requires pictures, so too should every Wes Clark thread.


14 posted on 11/13/2004 10:01:36 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
." Yet even as troops move street by street through the Sunni city, the measure of their success is elusive. There's no uniformed enemy force, no headquarters, no central command complex for U.S. troops to occupy and win. At the end, there will be no surrender.

Thank God Wesley, and his lack of diverse military thought, isn't the one leading the military campaign in Iraq.

Gee, I ponder what his motivation in this writing may be? /sarcasm

17 posted on 11/13/2004 10:06:30 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Clark is like a 20 year old punk in a 60 year old body. What does he offer in terms of public debate? He's a light weight.


19 posted on 11/13/2004 10:07:32 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Will Wesley Clark, like PortaJohnny, ever give up his opportunism to which he sacrifices the nation's interest? Why is it that none of his classmates from the Point like or respect the guy? We wonder.


23 posted on 11/13/2004 10:14:32 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Why were you fired by the Clinton Administration Wes?

Newsweek reports that Gen. Shelton was in fact pretty open and frank in his criticisms of Wesley Clark: To say Clark was unpopular among his fellow officers in the military is an understatement. As he rapidly rose through the ranks, he was widely regarded as a champion brown-noser and know-it-all, a sort of Eddie Haskell in Army green. In conversation with friends, Colin Powell would privately put down General Clark as "Lieutenant Colonel Clark" i.e., a perpetual eager-beaver wanna-be. Some officers questioned his judgment. Talking to a high-ranking Clinton administration official, Gen. Hugh Shelton, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who engineered Clark's firing, bluntly referred to Clark as a "nut."
25 posted on 11/13/2004 10:15:23 AM PST by elizabetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

This moron is not worth listening to. What a waste of humanity!!!


30 posted on 11/13/2004 10:22:28 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

a canuck says thanx for sir wesley's email address,i just emailed dorkhead and dammit i feel better now...he has been a huge embarassment to your military and your country,my god.......,clark,kerry,the clintons,carville,odonnell,striesand,moore,rather,npr...your country just gives and gives[sorry for the spelling..i can't laugh and spell at the same time]....nothing personal,canada is as bad and probably worse but we watch your news and you don't get ours.... not that we make much anyway.....bc boy


33 posted on 11/13/2004 10:25:06 AM PST by bc boy (bc boy again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I would like to know why Genrl Wesly Clark released Army Tanks to be used at WACO against the Branch Dividians. I believe he was the Base Commander at that time?


Violation of The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 at WACO.

Currently, America's military is largely prohibited from acting as a domestic police force. And while the presence of military "advisors" during the siege, brutality and slaughter at WACO Texas set ominous trends in motion, few thought in terms of its implications.


36 posted on 11/13/2004 10:32:42 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Clarke, S.T.F.U. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


44 posted on 11/13/2004 11:02:58 AM PST by jedi150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Dittos. Weasely is such a loser!


45 posted on 11/13/2004 11:03:06 AM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

A "chicken general" only Clinton could love!


49 posted on 11/13/2004 2:44:24 PM PST by Bushbacker (ttlGe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson