Posted on 11/12/2004 3:47:19 PM PST by joyce11111
CBS, CNN and ABC: Caught in the Tank with Kerry
On November 4, Jodi Wilgoren of The New York Times reported details of election night television coverage that are yet to get the attention they deserve. Buried deep in a story, far from the front page, here’s what Wilgoren wrote:
"The critical moment came at 12:41 a.m. Wednesday, when, shortly after Florida had been painted red for Mr. Bush, Fox News declared that Ohio — and, very likely, the presidency — was in Republican hands.
"Howard Wolfson, a strategist who joined the [Kerry] campaign this fall, burst into the room where the brain trust was huddled and told them ‘we have 30 seconds’ to stop the other networks from following suit.
"The campaign pollster, Mark Mellman, and the renowned organizer Michael Whouley quickly dialed ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC — and all but the last refrained from calling the race through the night. Then Mr. Wolfson banged out a simple, two-line statement from Mary Beth Cahill, expressing confidence that Mr. Kerry would win Ohio once the remaining ballots were counted.
"'All through the process, what was driving our decision making was the memory of how in 2000, by allowing Florida to go for Bush, a lot of momentum was blocked,' said one person who was in the room. 'Our whole goal was stop the train from moving that way.'"
They stopped the train dead, and with it any pretense that CBS, CNN and ABC were practicing independent, objective, knowledgeable analysis and journalism. It is perfectly acceptable for networks to listen to what a campaign has to say, but not to ignore empirical evidence to favor that campaign.
In its wisdom, Fox News had selected Michael Barone as the on-air presence of its "Decision Desk" of election analysts. No living human knows more about the intricacies of American elections than Barone, for decades the principal author of "The Almanac of American Politics," the indispensable repository of fact, analysis and insight. Name any county in the country, and Barone not only understands it politically, he’s been there.
Fox News called Ohio, first and correctly. A while thereafter, Barone analytically demolished the spurious Kerry campaign spin that outstanding votes, including the much-discussed provisional ballots, could overcome the President’s Ohio lead. Later, Barone would report that Karl Rove had called, urging Fox News to call New Mexico for the President to put the Electoral College count over the top. Fox refused, because the numbers were not then sufficient to make the call with confidence.
Stating fears of repeating the debacle of Election 2000 television news coverage may well provide CBS, CNN and ABC with enough fig leaves to escape concentrated mass condemnation. In fact, Jacques Steinberg and David Carr of The New York Times wrote that story also, strangely appearing only two pages following Wilgoren’s revelations, but with no references to the Kerry campaign’s successful lobbying of the networks.
We are willing to listen to those of the media — television and print — who start with the simple declarative "We screwed up" and follow with a commitment to return independence and objectivity to their news coverage. While we are waiting, we, who have been labeled as idiots and worse, are at least smart enough to find alternative news sources.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Posted November 11, 2004
Is this really new?
No.
That's not exactly right - they called urging FNC to call NEVADA and FNC refused.
Excellent points, but obviously the author doesn't know that being called a pajama wearer by some idiot CBS executive is now a proud title.:)
Something we have known in our hearts all along, but to see it in black and white just cements my decision not to watch any news from those left-wing suck-ups! Now, I can't give up CSI, Judging Amy, or ER, but those are the most honest shows on those networks--it is the news that is fiction!!! Just gimme FOX and C-SPAN for the hard stuff!
I wish the obsolete old media would just hurry up and die.
The OOM?!
They ought to just rename the networks to DNC-1, DNC-2, DNC-3, etc.
Shocked I say, just shocked!
;)
By 9:00 PST anyone who could count knew Bush had it. All the stations were quick to call close states for Blue, but didn't call red states for hours. Fox had no choice but to call Ohio. It was obvious and to their credit, they DO report news.....most of the time.
TRUE, TRUE, TRUE! The coverup at FOX continues. I have written every person you could think of there and NOT ONE PERSON has written back to me regarding this issue.
1 - Thanks - good post, and nice to know what happened, and more confirmation of what appeared to be happening while we watched the returns live.
I personally had called the election right, for Bush, down to the exact states (Except Iowa) at a little after 10PM CST.
The MSM are "invested" as the shrinks say, in the "Blue" culture. They instinctively bury facts which would undercut their cherished (but wrong) beliefs.
Congressman Billybob
Allowing Florida to go to Bush in 2000?!? Allowing??? Hmm, I thought the voters determined that.
I've never enjoyed watching election coverage so much in my life. Once Fox and NBC declared Bush the winner, I switched to CNN (first and last time, I promise) to watch Larry King and Wolf Blitzed squirm. Blitzed even had the nerve to proclaim "we're not holding off because we favor any candidate-we just don't want a repeat of 2000". I sprayed my coffee table with Coors Light. CNN knew they were lashed to the deck of the good ship Kerry/Edwards and it was going down. It was ecstacy to watch.
FWIW, Cue-Ball (Carville), on CNN said it was all over around 12:41 AM EST. He then gave a fairly realistic apraisal of the DNC. Begala, King and Blitzer appeared to be in shock.
PING
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.