Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican praises Arafat for Palestinian vision
ABC News ^ | 11-11-04

Posted on 11/11/2004 7:16:53 AM PST by SJackson

The Vatican has praised Yasser Arafat as a charismatic leader who struggled to win independence for his people, and repeated its support of a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel.

Pope John Paul, who last met Arafat in 2001, retreated into private prayer when he was told of the death of the Palestinian leader earlier on Thursday in Paris, a Vatican source said.

The Pope, who made a historic trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories in 2000, sent a message saying he was particularly close to the Palestinian people "in this hour of sadness".

The 84-year-old Pope's message said he prayed that the "star of harmony" would soon bring peace to the Holy Land and that both Israelis and Palestinians could live "reconciled among themselves as two independent and sovereign states".

Earlier, a statement by the Vatican's chief spokesman called Mr Arafat the "illustrious deceased" and asked God to grant eternal rest to his soul.

"The Holy See joins the pain of the Palestinian people for the passing of President Yasser Arafat. He was a leader of great charisma who loved his people and tried to guide them towards national independence," said the statement by chief spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls.

The official statement was bound to displease Israel because it made no mention of militant attacks, which the Jewish state blamed on Mr Arafat and insists must stop before the stalled peace process can get back on track.

In recent years the Vatican continued to recognise Mr Arafat as the legitimate leader of the Palestinians after Washington and Israel had written him off.

But Vatican officials privately criticised him for what one called "jumping off the peace train".

"There is no doubt that he was a towering figure for his people but his great mistake was not to sign on at Camp David," a senior Vatican prelate told Reuters.

"That was a great failure and a lot of problems stemmed from that," he said. "He missed his date with history."

At a US-brokered a peace summit in 2000 both sides came close to a final accord that would have established an independent Palestinian state, but the talks broke down over the status of Jerusalem and Palestinian refugees.

Washington and Israel blamed Mr Arafat for the failure.

Over the past four years, the Vatican's improvement in relations with the Palestinian Authority coincided with a deterioration of relations with Israel.

The Pope repeatedly criticised Israeli incursions into Palestinian territories and last November, the Vatican was shocked when Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon came to Rome for several days but did not ask to see the Pope.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: arafat; praise; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-358 next last
To: Cronos
He is also the head of the Apostolic church, the church founded by Christ.

And on this we will disagree till we both turn blue in the face and the sky itself falls on our heads.

181 posted on 11/11/2004 11:03:49 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

Well, God created His Church and you disagree with Him?


182 posted on 11/11/2004 11:04:02 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
He was certainly charismatic, so that doesn't seem to me to be more than obvious sentiments. All leaders have "great charisma." Seems to be words that don't convey much.

"Illustrious," it was mentioned, could just mean "prominent" or noticeable. That he was.

True. I should give the pope the benefit of the doubt. But the impression, at least in English, isn't very good. Something may also have been lost in translation.

183 posted on 11/11/2004 11:04:22 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

False about being proud... What I said is that if I had to do it again, I would in a second and that I have no regrets... I said that if I had embryos left over from an insemination, I would gladly give them to stem cell research.

As to being anti christians, the Vatican declaration is a demonstration of why I find christianity not worth too much..

Beside of course the factr that Jesus (if he ever existed) was not the messiah!
Next?


184 posted on 11/11/2004 11:06:33 AM PST by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

Who are you referring to? Just curious.


185 posted on 11/11/2004 11:06:37 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: dmz
It's just me, but I have trouble with using Castro in the same breath as Hitler, Mao, and Stalin.

Okay, it's just you. We'll go on making the analogy.

186 posted on 11/11/2004 11:07:14 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; bigeasy_70118; Convert from ECUSA; Aquinasfan
The statement by Navarro-Valls was delivered in Italian:

La Santa Sede si unisce al dolore del popolo palestinese per la scomparsa del Presidente Yasser Arafat. Egli è stato un leader dal grande carisma, che ha amato il suo popolo ed ha cercato di guidarlo verso l’indipendenza nazionale. Dio accolga nella Sua misericordia l’anima dell’illustre Defunto e conceda la pace alla Terra Santa, con due Stati indipendenti e sovrani, pienamente riconciliati tra loro.

It's an error to translate "illustre" as "illustrious". In Vatican diploma-speak, illustre is a throw-away honorific, intended to convey respect. Its best translation in English would be "distinguished".

Like all governments, the Holy See frequently deals in euphemism or opportune flattery. You can be sure President Bush regularly finds himself offering public compliments that far exceed his private opinions of the recipients.

187 posted on 11/11/2004 11:07:50 AM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

God didn't create a Church... Pagans who didn't understand Judaism put a neo-platonistic politheistic accretion onto Judaism, and pewsto, you have a cult...

God had nothing to do with it...


188 posted on 11/11/2004 11:07:58 AM PST by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus; Qwinn
Maybe you should read the book Hitler's Pope... And Constantine' sword...

Hmmm... maybe you should read Alice through the looking glass and pass that off as fact too.....
189 posted on 11/11/2004 11:07:59 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This Catholic says Shame on the Pope for speaking words of praise for a filthy, perverse, thieving, unworthy, coldblooded murdering butcher.

Shame on Pope John Paul II.

190 posted on 11/11/2004 11:08:25 AM PST by Fatalis (John Kyl in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus
Beside of course the factr that Jesus (if he ever existed) was not the messiah!

What historic reality are you from?

191 posted on 11/11/2004 11:08:38 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
So the Pope prayed for Arafat's soul, expressed sympathy for a grieving people, and expressed a desire for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

What part of this is "bad" or "unChristian" again?

Dave, once the person is DEAD, it's too late to pray for their soul. That is "unChristian" and against what the Bible teaches. Try not to display your ignorance on these matters.

192 posted on 11/11/2004 11:08:39 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

These books are very good historical books...

Alice is fiction... A bit like the NT!


193 posted on 11/11/2004 11:09:23 AM PST by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Something may also have been lost in translation.

Or added in. Could it be that a journalist might be helpfully stirring the pot? The mind boggles.

194 posted on 11/11/2004 11:09:32 AM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

Putting it bluntly -- if you do not belong to an apostolic church (the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Oriental churchs are all apostolic), then your teachings are generally the writings of some man (Calvin, Luther, WEsley) and not from God.


195 posted on 11/11/2004 11:10:01 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Facts... And there is no proof of the historical existence of Jesus... None whatsoever!

It is belief... You believe? Your right... I consider him to be a fiction...


196 posted on 11/11/2004 11:10:40 AM PST by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Askel5; TapTheSource
You, like so many of the rabid anti-Catholic bigots on the forum, are somehow under the mistaken impression that every word the Bishop of Rome utters is somehow "infallible." That designation is reserved solely for "ex cathedra" pronouncements on matters of dogma and doctrine.

well put and we need to keep repeating that or the anti-Christian bigots on this forum will make folks forget that important point
197 posted on 11/11/2004 11:11:41 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Knowing lots of Catholics here at FR, I will refrain from the howl of protest that wants to come from my keyboard. I will only point out that this is a perfect illustration of the gulf that still exists between Caltholics and Jews.

This Catholic says otherwise. There are Gulfs between some Catholics and Jews, just as there are also gulfs between some Jews and Christians. There is inexcusable conduct all around.

Today, though, the Vatican has shamed Catholicism.

198 posted on 11/11/2004 11:12:01 AM PST by Fatalis (John Kyl in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus
God didn't create a Church... Pagans who didn't understand Judaism put a neo-platonistic politheistic accretion onto Judaism, and pewsto, you have a cult...

Here's a brilliant flash: the apposals were ALL JEWS and they were all the founders of the Church. All the first members were JEWS, many thousands of them. One of the Apostals, Paul ie: Saul the Oppressor was a prosecutor of the Christians for the Jewish Patriarchy in Jerusalem. Gads, get some education on a subject if you're going to open your trap about it.

199 posted on 11/11/2004 11:14:43 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus; SoothingDave; Askel5
Alice is fiction... A bit like the NT!

hmmm... so you consider the OT to be fiction as well, so the entire Bible to you is a work of fiction?
200 posted on 11/11/2004 11:15:07 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson