Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Largest Union Issues Call for Major Changes (A.F.L.-C.I.O. in turmoil)
NY Times ^

Posted on 11/09/2004 10:12:41 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

As the nation's union leaders gather today in Washington the labor movement is in turmoil, with the president of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s largest union hinting that it might pull out of the labor federation and some labor leaders saying that John J. Sweeney may face a challenge for its presidency.

In a sign of the jockeying and soul-searching, Andrew L. Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s largest union, called yesterday in a letter for far-reaching changes in labor designed to increase its membership, proposing a $25-million-a-year campaign to unionize Wal-Mart and a near doubling in the amount spent annually on organizing.

The meeting comes as long-simmering differences in the A.F.L.-C.I.O. have been intensified by President Bush's re-election, with many union leaders fearing retaliation because organized labor spent more than $150 million to try to defeat him.

"The labor movement was really shaken by the election and they're also badly divided," said Kate Bronfenbrenner, a labor relations professor at Cornell University.

Unions are also feeling a sense of crisis, largely because the percentage of workers in unions has plunged to 13 percent from nearly 35 percent in the 1950's and because corporations are cutting back health benefits and pensions.

In recent months, Mr. Stern, whose union, with 1.6 million members, is the nation's fastest growing, has warned that the service employees might break away from the A.F.L.-C.I.O. - a federation of 60 unions and 13 million workers - unless the federation embraces major changes to reverse labor's decline.

Mr. Stern said in his letter to the 54 members of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s Executive Council that President Bush's victory had intensified the need for change. "When only 13 percent of the American work force is in unions, our ability to win national elections is limited,'' he said. And he said he wanted a vote on proposals for change before the president's inauguration in January, instead of at the labor convention in July. Mr. Stern's call for broad restructuring has fueled fierce divisions, even causing one union, the International Association of Machinists, to warn that it might quit the A.F.L.-C.I.O. if Mr. Stern prevails in his push to remake the federation.

Adding to the tensions, some labor leaders say that a close ally of Mr. Stern, John W. Wilhelm, the longtime president of the hotel workers' union, might challenge Mr. Sweeney, who is up for re-election next year.

In an interview, Mr. Wilhelm declined to say whether he would run against Mr. Sweeney, who says he will seek a new four-year term at the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s convention in July.

"We have to do things much differently in the labor movement because of all the challenges that we face," Mr. Wilhelm said. "Organized labor right now is obviously in trouble because we continue to decline as a percent of the work force."

Mr. Sweeney, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s president, called today's meeting to discuss proposals to reshape the union movement and to assess labor's political efforts this fall.

He, too, sent a letter to labor leaders yesterday, saying that unions needed to reshape their movement "to better take on corporate America and win power for working families in today's economy." He added, "We should be big enough to discuss our different positions with respect for each other and without restoring to an 'us against them' stance."

Mr. Stern's proposals would amount to a thoroughgoing restructuring of labor.

In his letter he called for consolidating the federation's 60 unions, perhaps to less than 20, saying that many unions are too small to grapple with giant corporations.

"Since the founding of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. nearly 50 years ago, our employers have changed, our industries have changed, technology has changed, and the global economy has changed," Mr. Stern said.

"The labor movement has not kept pace with these changes. Today, workers and their families are paying the price," he said.

Complaining that workers are often hurt when 10 or more unions represent workers in a single industry, Mr. Stern called for giving the A.F.L.-C.I.O. power to bar a union from negotiating a contract that undercuts the wages and benefits that unions in the same industry have already negotiated.

At his union's convention last June, Mr. Stern said the A.F.L.-C.I.O., in order to be more effective in helping workers, needed power to hold unions accountable - to make sure they organize more workers and do not undercut one another. At that convention, he warned, "We either transform the A.F.L.-C.I.O. or build something stronger together," language his aides said suggested that he might break off from the federation to begin a more aggressive, growth-oriented federation.

As part of an effort to make $2 billion available for unionizing efforts over the next five years, Mr. Stern called yesterday for giving half the dues that member unions pay the A.F.L.-C.I.O. back to the unions so they would have more money available for organizing.

He also proposed using the $25 million in royalties that the A.F.L.-C.I.O. gets each year from its Union Plus credit card to organize Wal-Mart, the nation's largest corporation.

"The Wal-Mart business model of providing low wages and few benefits, shifting jobs overseas to exploit workers under poverty conditions and viciously opposing workers' freedom to form unions is setting a pattern that undermines good jobs for all working people at home and abroad," Mr. Stern wrote.

Wal-Mart officials say that their workers receive competitive wages and benefits, that Wal-Mart is not opposed to unions and that conditions are humane in the overseas factories that produce many of the goods it sells.

Mr. Sweeney, who came to power in 1995 promising to rejuvenate the movement, said he welcomed many of Mr. Stern's proposals, including his call to have unions back national health care reform and have unions back a campaign to pressure employers not to interfere in organizing drives. He said the was already carrying out some of these proposals

"I look forward to discussing these and a range of ideas that aim to strengthen the voice of working people," Mr. Sweeney wrote.

Richard Sloan, a spokesman for the machinists' union, criticized Mr. Stern's proposals, asserting that they were part of a power play in which Mr. Stern and his allies were seeking to take over the A.F.L.-C.I.O.

"It's not Andy Stern's role in life to say to 60 other international unions that you got to do it my way or the highway," Mr. Sloan said. "That's just dead wrong. There's an arrogance to that. He fails by misunderstanding the nature of the labor movement - this isn't a set of elites that dictates to us. This is a democratic movement."

At their convention in September, the machinists' delegates authorized the union's executive council to withdraw from the A.F.L.-C.I.O. if its political opponents won control of the federation.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aflcio; andrewstern; johnsweeney; labormovement; seiu; unions; walmart

1 posted on 11/09/2004 10:12:42 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Way to go Walmart. I guess I'll have to do some more Christmas shopping there.


2 posted on 11/09/2004 10:14:53 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

With all the airline cuts, I bet the union numbers are falling big time...


3 posted on 11/09/2004 10:15:50 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
""When only 13 percent of the American work force is in unions, our ability to win national elections is limited,'' he said."
4 posted on 11/09/2004 10:17:57 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Yeah, good luck on unionizing Wally World.


5 posted on 11/09/2004 10:25:18 PM PST by no dems (Where's that bumper sticker from the '70s; "AMERICA, LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT" ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

ALot of these Union bossesdeserted their members during the closing of the Steel Mills in PA. They got theirs but you never got yours.

Most of the Unions aligned with the Socialist and got smashed in the Morals Vote. Their members voted against the Union supported Candidates. Another group that takes it's membership for granted. They do not listen to their members. The Elite in charge again.


6 posted on 11/09/2004 10:27:03 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Unions in the 60's and 70's priced, corrupted and stole their way to the situation they are in now. Starting with the end of the smokestack era and missing the 80's completely it seems. Sterns proposal to streamline and consolidate, what surely is a old 20th century mindset and way of doing things in the union itself is probably a good idea, but his insistence on going after Wal Mart is reaching for the moon with a bottle rocket. And a waste of money. From the things I read and the people I know, Wal- Mart has a good relationship with most of it's employees. And retail at that..no easy feat.


7 posted on 11/09/2004 10:30:24 PM PST by Cutterjohnmhb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cutterjohnmhb
Well my jury is still out on Walmart. So far the only Walmarts I've been able to frequent, and given the number of transfers that's over a wide portion of America, I've only been able to find the Walmarts that sell the exact same merchandise as any other chain and even the military exchanges. And just like any other chain, I see clean ones and dirty ones...but the dirty ones were few and far between.

I still haven't found one of the Walmarts that only sells the cheap crap made in China, and to be honest, there are times I need something that only needs to be cheap crap. Perhaps once I've seen one of those Chinese Walmarts with the slave laborers I might change my mind?

8 posted on 11/09/2004 10:34:47 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
The meeting comes as long-simmering differences in the A.F.L.-C.I.O. have been intensified by President Bush's re-election, with many union leaders fearing retaliation because organized labor spent more than $150 million to try to defeat him.

One of the undeniable liberal truths strikes again - liberals always accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of. The only reason they fear retaliation is because that's what they would do.

9 posted on 11/09/2004 10:36:39 PM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

Yup, yup


10 posted on 11/09/2004 10:38:33 PM PST by Cutterjohnmhb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Why are the unions hurting? The people are finding out that they pay a lot of money for nothing. Sure, they provide some benefits but so do businesses such as Wal-Mart. All unions do are force the business to jack up prices and cut employees in order to make a profit. What kind of sense does this make?

Keep your doors open Wal-Mart, I'll be coming with my payola.


11 posted on 11/09/2004 10:40:39 PM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

I love it when losers lose their losers loot on losers.....:o)

Union wasted some serious duckets trying to kerry the election. Kewl !

Stay safe !


12 posted on 11/09/2004 10:43:12 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I beene to chinese walmarts its the same as here. only cheaper. God Bless Walmart.


13 posted on 11/09/2004 10:45:24 PM PST by lulo_08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lulo_08

Would a Walmart in China only sell cheap junk made in America?


14 posted on 11/09/2004 10:46:23 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

yes why not.?


15 posted on 11/09/2004 10:46:42 PM PST by lulo_08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
All unions do are force the business to jack up prices and cut employees in order to make a profit. What kind of sense does this make?

The unions, or rather the AFL-CIO, are in it for the profit, too. More members means more dues money, and the affiliated unions must give up a hefty portion to Sweeney and his thugs. And none of those quoted make less than $150,000 a year plus perks.

In 2000 and 2001, I talked to quite a few IBEW Electricians. They were to a man excited about all the money the "international" had amassed in their pension from stock deals in Worldcom and Global Crossings. They were almost giddy with the presumption of fat pension checks. Talk to them today and to a man, they bemoan the fact that the "international" is refusing to use the pension fund to fund pensions.

16 posted on 11/10/2004 2:21:52 AM PST by woofer (Michael Moore, who's your daddy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

The fact that many union Dems voted for Bush is one of the true reasons that Bush was re-elected. But somehow that doesn't make the "list" of excuses being repeated in the MSM.


17 posted on 11/11/2004 8:58:37 AM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson