Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The arrogance and snobbery from some of these quotes is enough to make you sick, especially this condescending remark about "Jesusland"!
1 posted on 11/09/2004 6:07:52 PM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: GaryL

Bush won. Get over it.


272 posted on 11/09/2004 9:22:07 PM PST by Angry Republican (yvan eht nioj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

There's one fly in their ointment here. The so-called blue "states" are actually blue "metropolitan areas" that have infected red "states". While they might out number the red voters, I'd say the red voters have a numerical advantage in firearms. They might not allow session.


273 posted on 11/09/2004 9:25:14 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL
Quite frankly the blue states should be labelled 'Satanland'.

In all seriousness, about 75% of those blue states are red counties. This talk about secession is born out of hatred and spite.

275 posted on 11/09/2004 9:41:53 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL; MeekOneGOP
I just have one thing to say about that:

.


283 posted on 11/10/2004 2:46:07 AM PST by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

Secession sounds good to me.


288 posted on 11/10/2004 4:43:22 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

I say let them go. Then erect a fence with border check points to keep their asses IN the United States of Canada.


294 posted on 11/10/2004 5:12:46 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (Goodnight Chesty, wherever you may be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL; Travis McGee; Squantos; risk; Ernest_at_the_Beach; PhilDragoo

Gary, this remark is not directed to you, but to the fudge packing maggots talking about secession.

"Maggots, we will not allow you to secede. If you want the Cold Civil War which you are pushing to go into a real one, try it.


303 posted on 11/10/2004 5:54:16 AM PST by Grampa Dave (FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL
We were having a discussion of the whole idea of a second U.S. Civil War. There were a couple of interesting thoughts:

Would the U.N. try to put peacekeepers in conflict areas in the U.S.?

While the states are somewhat grouped, there are many blue areas in the red and red areas in the blue. What do those people do? Move?

One of the coolest points to be made was that this all boils down to where you find your emphasis in our name: The United States of America.

Blues tend to focus on the UNITED part. This emphasizes an all powerful government with the rich being forced to take care of the poor, most decisions being made on a national basis, and the government being the source of benevolence. Government service is best left to the elites, who are better equipped to make decisions for the masses.

Reds emphasis STATES. They understand that our country is a joining of 50 individual entities, each with specific needs, mores, and cultures. They believe in independence and freedom from government with smaller being better. They believe that taking care of the poor is a social responsibility best left to individuals. Government service is an interruption to your real life, not an ultimate goal of your life.

Some food for thought...

305 posted on 11/10/2004 6:09:22 AM PST by Crusher138 (Support capitalism. Check out www.USAPoliTees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL; Mrs Zip; BOBWADE

The current dimocRat spin is they have "morals and values". That is the newest talking point (It's mentioned on every liberal tv show). The spin fails when the extremely negative views of religion are expressed so succinctly.


314 posted on 11/10/2004 8:42:07 AM PST by zip ((Remember: pingDimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of Americans))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL
Bush was right: Outsourcing is a GOOD thing

I say, lets outsource ALL the liberals.

315 posted on 11/10/2004 8:45:51 AM PST by ShowMeMom (On to 06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL; KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Revel; Velveeta; Coleus; ...

Ping


317 posted on 11/10/2004 10:27:16 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL
This is more of the media hyping Sore-Loserman big-city loudmouths. It's a good thing they're free to leave the USA, 'cause they sure don't have the balls or ability to fight for secession. Any talk of secession by the "blue" states, needs to be considered in light of the county map:


324 posted on 11/10/2004 2:28:38 PM PST by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

Blue states are really blue cities. If you combine data on voter preference by income level (from exit poll data) and percent of taxes paid by income level (income, payroll, and excise taxes from IRS data), you find that Bush voters pay 57% of the taxes and Kerry voters pay 42% of the taxes.

% of taxes paid
Under $15,000 - 1.2%
$15,000-$29,999 - 4.3%
$30,000-$49,999 - 11.0%
$50,000-$74,999 - 14.6%
$75,000-$99,999 - 13.9%
$100,000-$199,999 - 23.3%
$200,000 or more - 31.7%

% voting for Bush
Under $15,000 - 36%
$15,000-$29,999 - 42%
$30,000-$49,999 - 49%
$50,000-$74,999 - 56%
$75,000-$99,999 - 55%
$100,000-$199,999 - 57%
$200,000 or more - 63%

For each income level, multiplying (% of taxes paid) X (% voting for Bush), gives you

% of taxes paid by Bush voters
Under $15,000 - 0.4%
$15,000-$29,999 - 1.8%
$30,000-$49,999 - 5.4%
$50,000-$74,999 - 8.2%
$75,000-$99,999 - 7.6%
$100,000-$199,999 - 13.3%
$200,000 or more - 20.0%

For a total of 57% of taxes paid by Bush voters. You can do the same exercise for Kerry and see that he gets 42%.

Exit poll source: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
Tax data source: http://www.house.gov/jct/x-2-01.pdf


330 posted on 11/21/2004 2:19:27 PM PST by The Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

So what are we going to do about the counties in blue states that want to secede from the oppressive blue states they belong to? Case in point: Erie County in New York.

New York is losing thousands of people each month. Just about everyone has a 5 year plan: to get out!


331 posted on 03/29/2005 8:25:57 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

Liberals can't wipe their butt right, their only hope is to parasite the United States as long as the RINOs allow them to.. Succession is a wet dream of a poodle..


334 posted on 03/29/2005 8:42:57 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL
The ironic thing is that they need to realize that Canada's western and eastern provinces would most likely join the so-called 'Jesus-land' states. Just the middle provinces Quebec and Ottawa are certifiable blue 'states.
336 posted on 03/29/2005 9:15:18 PM PST by Stand Watch Listen (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

It has been a dream of long standing that NYC would secede from NY state........... ;)


338 posted on 03/29/2005 10:11:55 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL

Let them go, the country they form will be dead broke in a decade and they will attract all of our criminal scum because the pickings will be easy there.

Plus all of the welfare babies will go there for their free handouts and free medical care. Once they all get there, then erect fences and armed guards to KEEP them there.

When the country falls and they all starve to death from being idiots, we can go back in and reoccupy them as territories.


345 posted on 03/30/2005 10:41:05 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GaryL
A civil cold war already exists in this nation due to the constant treason and hatred of America from the Left. A civil war between the Left and Main Stream America should not be taken lightly by anyone, Leftist or conservative. The Traitors would have to accept the responsibility of their actions. There would be no stopping the resulting punishment and justice after the fact and once reality hits them. No "time out". No "we really didn't mean it".

Those defending America would have the responsibility to carry out the punishment and required purges. And yes, for a time, we would have to be "no better than ________" fill in the blank with whatever you like.

Attempted succession (seizing of sovereign American territory) by the Left in this nation would be an act of war of course. Those who are currently trying to plan it, making maps and inciting others in time of war are likely already guilty of treason. But yet we are doing nothing about it.

How would these exact same people have been dealt with in WWII? How would these people have been dealt with during the last civil war?

It would have been harsh prison camps in the 1860s if they were lucky - or execution. As someone already pointed out - this kind of talk from the Left is a natural progression of their treason and hatred for America.

"ALL enemies, foreign and domestic" are literal words. There is no Grey area.

We fought our 1860's civil war ruthlessly compared to today's standards of hand wringing, angst, and carping at every bit of "excessive collateral damage". I wonder if we have the intestinal fortitude to be equally or more ruthless today because that is what would be required to purge America's traitors and enemies.

No mercy - only "fire, sword or hangman's noose" for traitors. Translate that statement however you like...

As the first Leftist stronghold started to be obliterated (after loyalists were first evacuated) would we shrink back from the carnage or press on until the traitors are throughly purged and eliminated?... Would we ruthlessly round up Leftists and deal justice to them?

The first thing that would have to be shut down would be the media. Today's media has no business anywhere near our troops. The goal of the media is to undermine them any way they can. Most of the media would have to be rounded up and dealt with if it ever came to a civil war with the Leftists.

The Left does not have the balls to try it because they know they are a bunch of limp wristed useless "pacifists". It's all drug induced fantasy by a bunch of Leftists with a really low collective IQ.

They would rather try to control America over decades of slowly taking over the education system, MSM, Government and courts which is why they are so pissed these days because we have put a boot in their ass over that little plan.
347 posted on 07/20/2006 4:57:09 AM PDT by Retired Army Special Forces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson