1 posted on
11/09/2004 12:49:01 PM PST by
NYer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: NYer
2 posted on
11/09/2004 12:50:06 PM PST by
Asphalt
To: NYer
Well, this was expected...
3 posted on
11/09/2004 12:50:37 PM PST by
Pitiricus
To: NYer
There go the evil, evangelical moral warriors again :-)
4 posted on
11/09/2004 12:50:49 PM PST by
Moleman
To: american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Euthanasia
Often disguised by the name "mercy killing," euthanasia also is a form of homicide. No person has a right to take his own life, and no one has the right to take the life of any innocent person.
In euthanasia, the ill or elderly are killed, by action or omission, out of a misplaced sense of compassion, but true compassion cannot include intentionally doing something intrinsically evil to another person (cf. EV 73).
EV John Paul II,
Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life)
Catholic Ping - please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
5 posted on
11/09/2004 12:50:59 PM PST by
NYer
("Blessed be He who by His love has given life to all." - final prayer of St. Charbel)
To: cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback
6 posted on
11/09/2004 12:51:45 PM PST by
NYer
("Blessed be He who by His love has given life to all." - final prayer of St. Charbel)
To: NYer
I don't really see where this is an issue for the federal government at all.
Yeah, I know, protecting civil rights -- but I think "civil rights" has become way too broad an instrument, and allows the feds to expand their influence FAR beyond the original intent of our Constitution.
7 posted on
11/09/2004 12:52:08 PM PST by
Maceman
(It's no longer a blue world, Max!!)
To: NYer
I think it is a terrible and immoral law, but I think the SC should not block it.
10 posted on
11/09/2004 12:54:44 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: NYer
It would seem to me that if the President beilieves in Federalism and States' Rights as a rationale for why abortion is a State matter not under the Constitutional jurisdiction of the Federal government, that he does not strengthen his case by taking this action.
11 posted on
11/09/2004 12:55:49 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are really stupid.)
To: NYer
If the people in a state want it then what is the big deal? If I had just a few agonizing days to live I might choose the easy way out too. Also, this is antithetical to the Conservative Principals of state's rights. The Republican party is standing in the way of personal choice and freedom.
12 posted on
11/09/2004 12:56:35 PM PST by
traviskicks
(Poverty has no causes. Only prosperity has causes. - Jane Jacobs)
To: NYer
I'm in favor of greater states' powers.
Keep the federal government out of these state decisions.
I'm pro-life, but I want these battles fought and won using the strict constitionalist approach. See Roe v. Wade if you any doubts about the folly of allowing federal judges to overturn local and state laws.
To: NYer; All
I actually think assisted suicide is a good thing. I think this Country cannot continue its dominance in the world, if we have so much public money going to old, unproductive people-- we need to direct the bulk of public money to encouraging families, education, etc. Money should be dedicated to the producers. Of course, I would never want involuntary euthanasia to occur, but old people who are terminally ill, with no quality of life, who want to die with dignity should be able to do so.
To: NYer
I expect the usual "my body, my rights" crowd to jump all over this, but the AG is right on the mark in trying to stop the "right to die" movement. This movement is not about allowing sick people to kill themselves (though a decent society would surely encourage them to do otherwise). It's about sanctioning medical killing. And we know exactly where that leads. In fact, the latest trend in Europe is killing off sick children.
People who think this is OK ought to read Wesley Smith's work, especially Culture of Death and Forced Exit: The Slippery Slope from Euthanasia to Legalized Murder.
To: NYer
Errrr, I don't like this at all. The people of OR decided assisted suicide is OK. I completely agree. The Feds have no right to deny people who are terminally ill the right to die humanely.
21 posted on
11/09/2004 1:10:47 PM PST by
itslex71
(southern by birth, republican by the grace of my dad)
To: NYer; Salvation
23 posted on
11/09/2004 1:12:51 PM PST by
dixiechick2000
(President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
To: NYer
doctors take an oath to heal patients
Not anymore. The Hippocratic Oath has been out of most medical schools for at least a decade.
25 posted on
11/09/2004 1:21:56 PM PST by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: NYer
Bush administration asks Supreme Court to block assisted suicide law in Oregon
Not a good headline. It should be:
Bush administration asks Supreme Court to block assisted suicide law in Oregon
Exceptions granted for registered Democrats
Okay, okay, just a little partisan fun...
To: NYer
49 posted on
11/09/2004 2:32:19 PM PST by
Blogger
To: NYer
Thank goodness for this move to promote federalism! If we're against Roe, we should be 100% against OREGON laws at the FEDERAL level. /sarcasm
56 posted on
11/09/2004 3:22:15 PM PST by
LibertarianInExile
(NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
To: NYer
Murder is murder whether or not it is at the beginning of life, or near the end of it.
58 posted on
11/09/2004 3:23:32 PM PST by
Paperdoll
(on the cutting edge - OUR FIGHT HAS JUST BEGUN)
To: NYer
This should not be a federal issue.
68 posted on
11/09/2004 3:36:05 PM PST by
Dan from Michigan
("No time for losers, cause we are the champions...of the world!!!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson