Posted on 11/09/2004 11:29:18 AM PST by No Dems 2004
Washington, DC, Nov. 9 (UPI) -- Observers watching the counting of New Mexico's 2004 provisional and absentee ballots have uncovered evidence of voter fraud, Opinion Journal said Tuesday.
O.J. political diarist John Fund said the Bernalillo County clerk "told media outlets that observers had discovered instances of voter fraud" during the attempt to qualify 18,000 provisional and absentee ballots cast in last week's presidential election.
"In counting the first 5,000 provisional ballots," Fund reported, "observers turned up 53 instances of individuals voting more than once. They also found four voters who were dead and dozens of felons attempting to vote. In two cases, the same individual tried to vote three times: early, absentee and on Election Day."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I suppose we are talking about Kerry ballots are we not?
These two people should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Stuff like this should be on Greta's show, not the Scott Peterson trial.
And I wonder who were they voting for, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
I am sure if it is coming from John Fund it is the Democrat Vote Fraud Machine in full effect. Bill Richardson learned from the best criminal in the world.
We're talking about ILLEGAL ballots that should be thrown out. What I meant to say is that a lot of the Ohio provisional ballots will probably be thrown out as garbage, just like in New Mexico.
Well, the article says nothing about which side the fraud was helping, so I guess we can draw our own conclusions based on the normal liberal bias to the media, eh?
The party isn't revealed. That almost always means its a RAT.
I would seriously doubt if those voters were voting FOR Bush...that would simply not be in GOOD LIBERAL STANDING!!! We know where the scummy behaviour is sourced from...
Provisional ballots are questionable ballots to begin with. If any are fraudulant, they are discarded and are a none vote. Since Bush is ahead, this can't hurt him but can hurt Kerry's chances of catching up.
where do you report voter fraud. I have this guy in my office who is from brazil and claims he has two IDs and he voted once in hartford and once in simsbury for kerry.
How do i have him investigated?
Thank-God-it-wasn't-close bump.
Additional information to contemplate.
Results from the NM Legislative Information Technology Oversight Committee 11/08/2004
Background: Approximately 18 months ago we who sit on the Committee requested that an intrusion test be completed to determine vulnerabilities to our state IT systems. Numerous deficiencies were identified and many corrective recommendations were made.
Yesterday’s meeting: The former Deputy of the State Office of Chief Information Officer who has since moved over to the State Home Land Security Office and who took his responsibilities for network security with him testified before the committee. When asked if there were any IT systems in State Agencies that were vulnerable to outside attack and manipulation he would only answer “Yes”. When asked which Agencies were vulnerable he replied that as the meeting was an open public meeting he could not answer, as it would expose the state. When asked if the recommended corrective actions had been implemented he said that it was unknown as no further intrusion testing had been conducted but that it appeared that the recommendations had not been implemented. When asked if the Secretary of State (SOS) systems had been a one of the subjects of the original intrusion testing he indicated that it had. He refused to answer if the SOS had implemented the recommended security changes. When asked if the SOS systems were being monitored, he indicated that they were and that monitoring of the SOS systems started three weeks ago.
Result: The Information Technology Oversight Committee will hold an unscheduled closed executive meeting in December so that members of the Legislature can find out just how pervasive the lack of security is in reference to the state’s IT systems and networks. Additionally, indication is that the SOS froze out members of the Office of the Chief Information Officer who could have helped secure the SOS voter IT systems. Insisting only she and the vendor of the IT system work on the problem. All indications are that the problems at the SOS have not been resolved and therefore that is way the Office of the Chief Information Officer began monitoring the SOS systems. Making matters worse is that the SOS is not sharing what she knows about her system or is allowing any information to be released to other state agencies as to the security of her systems.
It is unknown if the SOS systems have been compromised, however it does appear that the possibility exist.
Right now it is a Class Five Felony, and it used to be just a Misdemeanor.
Vote fraud is treason---it should be prosecuted as such.
Now you know why that slimball Eric Holder said on Fox before the election that "if ALL the ballots are counted in Ohio, John Kerry will win."
It was because they knew ahead of time how many ballots they had already cast threw absentee and provincal!
This wouldn't happen in Detroit. The democrats who count the ballots would have signed different names to each provisional ballot and corrected the ones that weren't for Kerry.
Thought you guys might be interested - Ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.