Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuality: What would Jesus do?
World Net Daily ^ | 11/9/04 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 11/09/2004 10:46:18 AM PST by Nice50BMG

Tuesday, November 9, 2004


between the lines Joseph Farah


Homosexuality: What would Jesus do?


Posted: November 9, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Joseph Farah


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Patricia Ireland, former president of the National Organization of Women, raised what probably sounded like a good question to some recently.

She asked during a debate on the Fox News Channel: "If ... lesbian and gay rights issues were such a serious kind of value, a core value, why did Jesus never talk about them?"

Of course, the answer is that homosexuals have no special rights that distinguish what they do and who they are. They have only the same rights the rest of humanity has. The question should be more appropriately asked of people like Ireland, who pretend to be Christians, while asserting values that are contrary to the Christian faith and the Judeo-Christian tradition.

That was her question. And that is the appropriate answer to the question she asked. But I'm not sure she was asking the right question. Let me see if I can more properly frame the question to help her out.

If the institution of marriage as we know it between one man and one woman is such an important value, a core value of the Christian faith, why did Jesus never talk about it?

The answer to that question, of course, is that He did. He did so explicitly. He defined it clearly. And His definition leaves no room for same-sex unions.

And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

– Matthew 19:4-6

That's what Jesus Himself said about marriage. It's also a very strong statement about the fact that men and women were made for each other. There's no talk here of civil unions. There's no suggestion here of domestic partnerships. There's no hint here that men should fool around with men and that women should fool around with women.

It's a straightforward statement that alone should clarify any misconceptions about what Jesus thought and believed and commanded insofar as sexual unions.

But the Bible and the Christian faith are based on much more than the words spoken by Jesus, who explained that He did not come to overturn the law but to fulfill it. That means the basic commandments of the Hebrew Scriptures didn't change when Jesus came along. And those laws are crystal clear in condemning homosexuality as an abomination in the sight of God – as they are in the inspired teachings of Paul in the New Testament.

Jesus Himself was referring to the law as laid out in Genesis 2:24: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."

My point is that people like Patricia Ireland, John Kerry and Hillary Clinton like to pretend they are operating under the same value system that led to Western Civilization, the same value system that resulted in the founding of America, the same value system that was taught by Jesus and the Hebrew prophets before Him.

They are not. They are operating under different values. They are only pretending to have a different interpretation of those values. That is why they are so uncomfortable talking about values. Because they are in constant fear you will find them out – that you will discover they are operating under a completely different worldview.

But it's important to recognize what their game is.

It doesn't matter to them what Jesus taught. But they know it still matters to enough Americans. And if enough Americans see through their charade, then they can't win elections. And if they can't win elections, they can't impose their different morality on you.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: farah; gay; hags; homosexual; homosexualagenda; jesus; now; patriciaireland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: kkindt

***meaning we are all born with desires we have to resist ***

Exactly!!! Imagine what would happen if we all could "justify" our desires to steal, cheat, run over the pedestrian who walked in front of us, ram the car that cut us off, etc., etc., etc.


21 posted on 11/09/2004 11:22:57 AM PST by homemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

My opinion is that Jesus would love the homosexual as he has commanded that we should love everyone. He would not shun them or condemn them. He would ask to let he that is without sin to cast the first stone. And he would do what he did for a number of people - he would heal them. Just like he healed the lepers, the blind, the woman with the issue of blood, the lame, the sick, the palsied, and even some who had already died - he would heal the homosexual of their sad and lonely affliction. It is a tragedy that today those who are so afflicted find it so difficult, if not impossible, to find appropriate treatment for their sickness.


22 posted on 11/09/2004 11:23:21 AM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG
And His definition leaves no room for same-sex unions.

And very little room for divorce, since Jesus went on to say, "And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery". In MArk 10, Jesus doesn't even have the fornication clause.

So will the Marriage Amendment include a ban on divorce?

23 posted on 11/09/2004 11:24:06 AM PST by Drennan Whyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG
Jesus did, in fact, address the issue of homosexuality:

He warned that the last generation, when He returns, will be like the generation of Noah and of Sodom and Gomorrah. One of the major characteristics of both civilizations was perversion.

He also named fornication as a sin. It is not necessary to describe every way a person can commit fornication, but homosexuality is one example.

Further, He asserted that if Sodom and Gomorrah had seen the miracles He performed they would have repented. Their cities would have never been destroyed.

Additionally, the book of Revelation is unique in that it was directly communicated to John by Christ. It also contains warnings that those who practice homosexuality would not be allowed into the heavenly city. Their place will be the lake of fire.

Jesus wants to set people free from all sins, including homosexuality.

First Corinthians 6:11 says "Such (homosexuals included in the previous verse) were some of you, but you are washed, you are sanctified, you are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God".
24 posted on 11/09/2004 11:25:09 AM PST by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG
This topic has also been explored in detail by thoughtful commentators at:

http://www.cccu.org/resourcecenter/resID.2043/rc_detail.asp and,

http://www.dennisprager.com/rightandwrong.html

25 posted on 11/09/2004 11:25:43 AM PST by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG
She asked during a debate on the Fox News Channel: "If ... lesbian and gay rights issues were such a serious kind of value, a core value, why did Jesus never talk about them?"

If you understand that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are One God (the Trinity), than you know that Jesus did speak about homosexuality back in Lev. 20:13.

26 posted on 11/09/2004 11:26:21 AM PST by newsgatherer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kkindt

We may find someone attractive (who is married, too young, a relative, same sex, etc.) but only one group seems to think that they should be encouraged to act on their desire.


27 posted on 11/09/2004 11:27:38 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Many if not most do not WANT to change . . . supposedly there are Christian treatment programs out there--I don't remember what they are called but they treat homosexuals and are supposedly very successful. The Bible is a great guidebook for change and it's available in any bookstore, too.

If people do not WANT to change--no matter WHAT the behavior--they will not change, no matter what treatment, etc. is available.


28 posted on 11/09/2004 11:27:51 AM PST by homemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kkindt
Yes. Jeffrey Dahmer may have been born 'that way.'
29 posted on 11/09/2004 11:28:56 AM PST by unspun (unspun.info | Did U work your precinct, churchmembers, etc. for good votes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: homemom
Many if not most do not WANT to change . . . supposedly there are Christian treatment programs out there--I don't remember what they are called but they treat homosexuals and are supposedly very successful. The Bible is a great guidebook for change and it's available in any bookstore, too. If people do not WANT to change--no matter WHAT the behavior--they will not change, no matter what treatment, etc. is available.

Does someone suffering from any number of mental disorders - schizophrenia, multiple personalities, psychosis, etc. WANT to change? Not necessarily. But treatment is still available for them. Where's the treatment for same gender attraction disorder?

30 posted on 11/09/2004 11:29:32 AM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

WWJD? "Those of you who are straight may launch the first stone...!"


31 posted on 11/09/2004 11:40:59 AM PST by meandog (qu"Do unto others before they do unto you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

bump


32 posted on 11/09/2004 11:41:42 AM PST by visualops (Get your Viking Kitty patches at http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I do not know the name of the group right now, but there is at least one group out there that helps homosexuals. Many pastors should also be able to help--a person would just have to ask them what their view is, before they sought their counselling.


33 posted on 11/09/2004 12:01:48 PM PST by homemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Would Jesus even care?

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing! Look, your house is left to you desolate. For I tell you, you will not see me again until you say, "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord".

Yeah. He cares.

34 posted on 11/09/2004 12:08:39 PM PST by LTCJ (CBS, all your Boyd Cycles are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Would Jesus even care?

Yes. He cares. Read the Bible.

35 posted on 11/09/2004 12:26:03 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (PRAY PRAY PRAY PRAY PRAY PRAY PRAY and PRAY some more!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

Interesting that the Matthew quote was in answer to the previous verse, Matthew 19:3 - And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, "Is it lawful to divorce one's wife for any cause?"

Sounds a bit taken out of context to me.


36 posted on 11/09/2004 12:33:18 PM PST by ozidar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nice50BMG

Hate the sin...not the sinner.


37 posted on 11/09/2004 12:34:17 PM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

"If a government takes a portion of a man’s wages and does good with it, has the man also done good? ......Today, the US government takes nearly 50% of a middle-class person’s paycheck after all taxes are factored in .....Uncle Sam will spend more money in just this year (2004) than it spent combined between 1787 and 1900 .... ”


The verse that keeps coming to my mind when reading about "church vs. state" is from Mark 12:17. (NIV) "..give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's". We must live in this world and live under its authorities, good and/or bad - but there is hope; this world it temporary; the eternal world has the ultimate Authority...and His name is Jesus.


38 posted on 11/09/2004 1:03:45 PM PST by cujosratpack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

bookmarking your post for later.


39 posted on 11/09/2004 1:05:10 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cujosratpack
We must live in this world and live under its authorities, good and/or bad - but there is hope;

Jesus did not say sit just sit on your hands and do nothing. For instance, the abolitionist movement started in the Churches. If you can affect government within the bounds of that government - you should!

40 posted on 11/09/2004 1:07:59 PM PST by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson