Posted on 11/08/2004 7:24:12 PM PST by ShinerBock
This is a link to the video of Olbermann tonight claiming that the election result is in doubt due to voter fraud in OH and FL. He practically took the BS the DUmmies have been producing, claimed it as his own research, and spent 16 minutes on it during his show.
Here's the link to the video from a DUmmy's personal page:
http://home.comcast.net/~hugh.moore/countdown_on_voting_irregs.wmv
It's worth watching just to see the kind of BS they're bringing up, but you might want to have a barf bag handy. He brought on a reporter from OH and Rep. John Conyers. It was a BS attempt to raise questions about the legitimacy of Bush's win--it's pure partisanship. But what else would we expect from Olbermann?
Obermans big mouth is about to get alot of Dims in trouble. They better tell him to cool it.
They are about to start something they can't finish.
I'm almost wishing they would finish up and open this can and assist in their own demise....exposing democrat fraud for all the world to see (although the world knows what they do anyway).
Thanks for the advice.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1274956/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1274820/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1274395/posts
The mods must be sleeping tonight not to notice this Spam-o-rama.
The New Mexico votes may be less about President Bush at this point but more about the intra state and congressional races as well as numerous county seats, initiatives and judges...ect. Some of those races may be close and may give more power to Repubs unles "properly adjudicated by Dem vote counters!"
I still think WI should have been Pres Bush's. I thought I had later figures, but all I have is from 10-15 and Bush was up 3.3 according to Real Clear Politics (I vaugely recall he maintained some lead there in the polls to the end). Anyone know how many absentee ballots are remaining there? The election figures only had sKerry up by about 11K.
Ms. Simpson hasn't heard of libraries?
I looked at the Secretary of State of Wisconsin website and got this message:
"The Elections Board does not publish unofficial results of elections. The deadline for certifying the official results of the November 2, 2004, Election is December 1, 2004. Until that date, results can be obtained on the county websites."
So you have to go to each county's website and hope they have updated numbers (some don't). Guess it makes it easier to hide things that way.
No, its mainly about President Bush/Senator Kerry as the US House races are settled (Pubs won two of three by wide margins and lost the third by an equally large margin) and no initiatives were on the ballot because NM does not allow them (only state constitutional amendments following legislative approval, which cuts down on these because the legislators don't like to give up power). I suppose a couple of local races could be changed, but its the casting of provisional ballots that has everyones dander up. They can be case by anyone who comes in and says they're John Doe and is registered as John Doe, no matter what their real name and address is, or whether they live in Las Vegas NM or NV, because no ID is required and it is against the law to ask for it.
Alot of dims would be headed to jail for voter fraud.
Thanks. Yep, it does make it easier to hide things - think they figure no one is going to take the time to go through all of those sites.
Iowa was given to Bush, he has a 13,000 vote lead. Final tally I might add.
I watched this shot-across-the-bow. It's only the first of many. He threw out a lot of stuff, as if to see what sticks best.
I have a week off of work coming up.....and I might decide to view all those website just to see...but some of the counties numbers aren't updated...so it might not work too well.
I wonder if the counties that are not updates are counties won by Kerry?
I say bring it on. If they really want to investigate voter fraud, so be it. It would be about time. Please don't send me into that briar patch Rep. Conyers.... Please....
I guess what I am saying is that the Dems really don't want to go there. Repubs should go there, but it looks too partisan... I sure wish they would grow a couple on this issue, but if they won't, I'm happy if the Dems jump off of their cliff.
I have been reading FR for years.
I disagree. With Rathergate, it took less than a full day for the first MSM articles about the brouhaha to surface. And to their credit, ABC News and the WaPost had experts taking a look at the documents very early on. This so-called voter fraud claims have been going on since even before the election was decided (it's clear the blackboxvoting site planned to do this all along if their man didn't win). I just don't see the MSM touching this with a ten-foot pole.
Somone tell Oberman the election oover Bush won and kerry conceeded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.