Skip to comments.
BUSH CONSIDERS CLARENCE THOMAS FOR CHIEF JUSTICE
Drudge Report ^
| November 6, 2004
Posted on 11/07/2004 3:42:35 PM PST by RWR8189
Edited on 11/07/2004 4:25:22 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN NOV 07, 2004 19:02:37 ET XXXXX
BUSH CONSIDERS CLARENCE THOMAS FOR CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exclusive**
President Bush has launched an internal review of the pros and cons of nominating Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as the chief justice if ailing William Rehnquist retires, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
A top White House source familiar with Bush's thinking explains the review of Thomas as chief justice is one of several options currently under serious consideration. But Thomas is Bush's personal favorite to take the position, the source claims.
"It would not only be historic, to nominate a minority as chief justice, symbolizing the president's strong belief in hope and optimism, but it would be a sound judicial move.... Justice Thomas simply has an extraordinary record."
One concern is the amount of political capital Bush would have to spend in congress to make the move.
A chief justice must be separately nominated by Bush and confirmed by the Senate, even if the person is already sitting on the court.
The need to replace Rehnquist could arise by year's end, Bush aides now believe.
Officially, Bush advisers call any Supreme Court vacancy talk premature.
Developing...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; chiefjustice; clarencethomas; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-337 next last
To: RWR8189
Thanks Matt, and thanks for the early exit polls on Tuesday too, that was sheer genius on your part.../s
41
posted on
11/07/2004 3:49:11 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(Tag Line Conservationist Week: "We trust Sen. Arlen Specter's word" (snicker-sigh))
To: orangelobster
Excellent if it happens, from Bush the father to his son. I will never forget the shameful display of racism that the democrats got away with.
42
posted on
11/07/2004 3:49:16 PM PST
by
sarasotarepublican
(Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
To: RWR8189
Do you smell something !!
OMG TEDDY JUST FILLED HIS PANTS !!!
Prefer Scalia, but this is just fine
To: RWR8189
Clarence Thomas is really the best option, unless Bush were to nominate the new justice as Chief (one hearing that way instead of two).
* Antonin Scalia -- too many duck hunting foibles
* Sandra Day, et al -- over my dead body
Nominee: Emilio Garza, Janice Rogers Brown
44
posted on
11/07/2004 3:49:31 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
To: Josh in PA
Good question. I'll be watching for the answer also.
45
posted on
11/07/2004 3:49:36 PM PST
by
texasflower
(Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
To: dfwgator
I'm white, 53 years old, east Texas redneck, and I cannot think of a finer person for President Bush to appoint to that station. Common now Jesse, say it,.. it's o.k.... go on...it won't hurt....gahed...it'll be over in just a moment...
To: JessieHelmsJr
Don't know how true this is, but why wouldn't Bush pick Scalia over Thomas? He has served more years and has more respect on the bench....I wonder if the duck hunting trip with Cheney hurt him, lol
47
posted on
11/07/2004 3:49:53 PM PST
by
WillT
To: OneTimeLurker
"I would like to see a non political reason not to give it to Scalia."
See my post #35.
48
posted on
11/07/2004 3:49:54 PM PST
by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: RWR8189
To: RWR8189
Bush tease to. When the thought crossed my mind, I thought Scalia would be better. But I think this would be Bush's way of extending his campaign into the second term, in a way. Democrats would be walking on eggs and nervous about going on the attack, and this would give Bush a good start. The question is whether Justice Thomas wants any part of it.
50
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:06 PM PST
by
dr_who_2
To: RWR8189
He would need the Advice and Consent of the Senate, this would prove very difficult.
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: lmr
This would be fantastic. I wonder if it would be hard for the Senate to reject him since he is already on the court. Lets see, "we can't make him chief, he, ah, disagrees with us."
Making Thomas Chief would be sweet icing on the Bush Victory Cake.
53
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:24 PM PST
by
garjog
To: 26lemoncharlie
I like Scalia too,but I would take Thomas too.
To: RWR8189
Wheee! Has this been a great week, or WHAT?
55
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:27 PM PST
by
NetSurfer
(All your provisional ballots are belong to us.)
To: RWR8189
P.S. I just checked the Properties on that photo at Drudge's website, and it's dated 11/06/2004, namely yesterday.
Interesting. Maybe something's up.
56
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:28 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Josh in PA
The main thing the Chief Justice can do, is he gets to pick who writes the majority and minority opinions. That is a powerful way to influence the court. He can always pick himself to write opinions he has strong beliefs on.
57
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:31 PM PST
by
SnakeGuy
To: Josh in PA
The
Chief Justice of the United States is the head of the Judicial Branch of the
government of the
United States, and presides over the
Supreme Court of the United States. The office is often, and incorrectly, referred to as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is composed of nine members, though that number has varied over the years, headed by the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice, like all the other justices, is nominated by the
President and confirmed to sit on the court by the
U.S. Senate. Some justices, like
William H. Rehnquist, were elevated to the highest post on the court by the President after having served previously on the bench as associate justice. Most others, like
William Howard Taft and
Earl Warren, were nominated to the highest bench without any previous experience on the court.
Duties
In addition to the duties of the Associate Justices, the Chief Justice has the following duties:
- If the Chief Justice is in the majority on a Supreme Court case, he or she may decide to write the Opinion of the Court, or may assign it to an associate justice of his or her choice.
- Presides when the Senate tries impeachments of the President of the United States.
- Traditionally officiates at the inauguration of the President of the United States. (This is not a Constitutional responsibility, however. All federal judges are empowered by law to administer oaths and affirmations, and the Chief Justice administers this oath due to the pomp and circumstance. The incoming President technically could choose any judge or any other officer with notarial powers.)
- Serves as the Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institute (also not a Constitutional responsibility).
58
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:37 PM PST
by
RobFromGa
(End the Filibuster for Judicial appointments in January 05)
To: JessieHelmsJr
I expect him to do just that. Hope he does.
Where are the cloture votes? Who voted against it, and are they gone now? How many dems voted for cloture?
59
posted on
11/07/2004 3:50:55 PM PST
by
tuckrdout
(You lose your right to complain about taxes, if you voted for any democrat!)
To: RWR8189
Then I have to go with Thomas myself. Scalia would be my first choice but Thomas is younger.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-337 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson