Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH CONSIDERS CLARENCE THOMAS FOR CHIEF JUSTICE
Drudge Report ^ | November 6, 2004

Posted on 11/07/2004 3:42:35 PM PST by RWR8189

Edited on 11/07/2004 4:25:22 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]








XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN NOV 07, 2004 19:02:37 ET XXXXX

BUSH CONSIDERS CLARENCE THOMAS FOR CHIEF JUSTICE

**Exclusive**

President Bush has launched an internal review of the pros and cons of nominating Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as the chief justice if ailing William Rehnquist retires, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

A top White House source familiar with Bush's thinking explains the review of Thomas as chief justice is one of several options currently under serious consideration. But Thomas is Bush's personal favorite to take the position, the source claims.

"It would not only be historic, to nominate a minority as chief justice, symbolizing the president's strong belief in hope and optimism, but it would be a sound judicial move.... Justice Thomas simply has an extraordinary record."

One concern is the amount of political capital Bush would have to spend in congress to make the move.

A chief justice must be separately nominated by Bush and confirmed by the Senate, even if the person is already sitting on the court.

The need to replace Rehnquist could arise by year's end, Bush aides now believe.

Officially, Bush advisers call any Supreme Court vacancy talk premature.

Developing...



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; chiefjustice; clarencethomas; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-337 next last
To: RWR8189

Thanks Matt, and thanks for the early exit polls on Tuesday too, that was sheer genius on your part.../s


41 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:11 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (Tag Line Conservationist Week: "We trust Sen. Arlen Specter's word" (snicker-sigh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: orangelobster

Excellent if it happens, from Bush the father to his son. I will never forget the shameful display of racism that the democrats got away with.


42 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:16 PM PST by sarasotarepublican (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Do you smell something !!

OMG TEDDY JUST FILLED HIS PANTS !!!

Prefer Scalia, but this is just fine


43 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:26 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Clarence Thomas is really the best option, unless Bush were to nominate the new justice as Chief (one hearing that way instead of two).

* Antonin Scalia -- too many duck hunting foibles
* Sandra Day, et al -- over my dead body

Nominee: Emilio Garza, Janice Rogers Brown

44 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:31 PM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Good question. I'll be watching for the answer also.


45 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:36 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I'm white, 53 years old, east Texas redneck, and I cannot think of a finer person for President Bush to appoint to that station. Common now Jesse, say it,.. it's o.k.... go on...it won't hurt....gahed...it'll be over in just a moment...


46 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:37 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (Texas Songwriter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr

Don't know how true this is, but why wouldn't Bush pick Scalia over Thomas? He has served more years and has more respect on the bench....I wonder if the duck hunting trip with Cheney hurt him, lol


47 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:53 PM PST by WillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker

"I would like to see a non political reason not to give it to Scalia."



See my post #35.


48 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:54 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Thank goodness.


49 posted on 11/07/2004 3:49:58 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Bush tease to. When the thought crossed my mind, I thought Scalia would be better. But I think this would be Bush's way of extending his campaign into the second term, in a way. Democrats would be walking on eggs and nervous about going on the attack, and this would give Bush a good start. The question is whether Justice Thomas wants any part of it.


50 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:06 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

He would need the Advice and Consent of the Senate, this would prove very difficult.


51 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:18 PM PST by BushCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: lmr
This would be fantastic. I wonder if it would be hard for the Senate to reject him since he is already on the court. Lets see, "we can't make him chief, he, ah, disagrees with us."

Making Thomas Chief would be sweet icing on the Bush Victory Cake.
53 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:24 PM PST by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

I like Scalia too,but I would take Thomas too.


54 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:25 PM PST by JessieHelmsJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Wheee! Has this been a great week, or WHAT?


55 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:27 PM PST by NetSurfer (All your provisional ballots are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

P.S. I just checked the Properties on that photo at Drudge's website, and it's dated 11/06/2004, namely yesterday.

Interesting. Maybe something's up.


56 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:28 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

The main thing the Chief Justice can do, is he gets to pick who writes the majority and minority opinions. That is a powerful way to influence the court. He can always pick himself to write opinions he has strong beliefs on.


57 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:31 PM PST by SnakeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
The Chief Justice of the United States is the head of the Judicial Branch of the government of the United States, and presides over the Supreme Court of the United States. The office is often, and incorrectly, referred to as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is composed of nine members, though that number has varied over the years, headed by the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice, like all the other justices, is nominated by the President and confirmed to sit on the court by the U.S. Senate. Some justices, like William H. Rehnquist, were elevated to the highest post on the court by the President after having served previously on the bench as associate justice. Most others, like William Howard Taft and Earl Warren, were nominated to the highest bench without any previous experience on the court.
[edit]

Duties

In addition to the duties of the Associate Justices, the Chief Justice has the following duties:


58 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:37 PM PST by RobFromGa (End the Filibuster for Judicial appointments in January 05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr

I expect him to do just that. Hope he does.

Where are the cloture votes? Who voted against it, and are they gone now? How many dems voted for cloture?


59 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:55 PM PST by tuckrdout (You lose your right to complain about taxes, if you voted for any democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Then I have to go with Thomas myself. Scalia would be my first choice but Thomas is younger.


60 posted on 11/07/2004 3:50:56 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson