Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Remember_Salamis

To all anti-Santorum posters, Santorum supported Specter because Pat Toomey isn`t well known enough in this state. I and many of us here would have supported Toomey, but Specter didn`t win his seat back by THAT much over a guy I can`t remember. Don`t be so quick to think Toomey would have won the seat, GWB didn`t win this state. To say Santorum should go down because of his support of Specter is stoopid. GWB supported Specter too. Santorum is a VERY viable VP candidate in '08 and would be rendered irrelevant if he was tossed from the senate in '06.


78 posted on 11/07/2004 3:59:19 PM PST by infidel29 (America is GREAT because she is GOOD, the moment she ceases to be GOOD, she ceases to be GREAT- B.F.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: infidel29
I and many of us here would have supported Toomey, but Specter didn`t win his seat back by THAT much over a guy I can`t remember.

Specter had trouble because a significant portion of PA Republicans washed their hands of him years ago! I myself voted Libertarian (Betsy Summers). Toomey could have beaten Hoeffel--with difficulty, I admit--because that missing portion would have turned out strongly for Toomey. Remember, Santorum wins comfortably in PA. Furthermore, Toomey would have had much better name recognition than Hoeffel. He could have pulled it out.

87 posted on 11/07/2004 4:09:08 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: infidel29

"To say Santorum should go down because of his support of Specter is stoopid."

-- No, "Stoopid" is stupid.


90 posted on 11/07/2004 4:11:17 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson