Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Specter gets his Chairmanship, let's boycott Santorum in 2006 (A Threat)

Posted on 11/07/2004 3:05:58 PM PST by Remember_Salamis

We must make it perfectly clear to Rick Santorum that if he lets Specter chair the judiciary committee, we WILL NOT SUPPORT HIM in 2006 for Senate. Instead, we will support Pat Toomey.

We must also make it perfectly clear to Bill Frist that if he does not block Specter Chairmanship, he might as well not even enter the 2008 primaries.

Both of these men hold the power over Specter and we must threaten to boycott their futures if they ignore their base.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2idiots; 4idiots; childish; circularfiringsquad; cutoffnose2spiteface; disruptors; emptythreat; fnidiots; idiots; infiltrated; rubbish; specter; sphincter; trolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-240 next last
To: Republican Wildcat

On NRO's The Corner last week, they were already speculating that a relatively low conservative turnout in PA this year may have been a result of Specter, and that Santorum may feel the brunt of a disenchanted base in 2006.


81 posted on 11/07/2004 4:01:55 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

IF ARLEN SPECTER NEVER "BORKED BORK", ROE v. WADE WOULD HAVE BEEN OVERTURNED IN 1992. The man appointed instead of Bork, Kennedy, was the deciding vote in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992. Do you want it to happen again???


82 posted on 11/07/2004 4:04:09 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

"There is no doubt that we would be better off with 54 Republican Senators and Judiciary Chairman Jon Kyl than 55 and Chairman Specter."


83 posted on 11/07/2004 4:04:50 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

I'm from TN...Bill Frist will NOT get my vote unless he starts getting some brass bauls!!!


84 posted on 11/07/2004 4:07:09 PM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

No, I don't want to ditch him. But I do want to let him know that he cannot ignore his base.

Also, any pro-lifer who backs a radical pro-choice man like Specter is not worth his salt, especially when he know full and well that Specter would be Chairman of the Judiciary committee.


85 posted on 11/07/2004 4:07:36 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Bush lost PA...but he didn't really lose PA, he probably legitimately won. He lost Philly...the land of the Big Dem Machine went 5 to 1 for Kerry. We have a Dem thug, Ed Rendell as our Governor. Voter fraud in the eastern part of the state was rampant...but again, can be explained away by having Rendell at the helm. The governor is up for re-election in '06...Toomey, WITH NO PARTY SUPPORT--ONLY GRASS ROOTS VOLUNTEERS almost won against Specter...Now, in '06, with the support of the party, Toomey could be elected governor. Spector is already old...he will be two years older in '06...and with a Toomey Governorship, should the need arise, a like thinking (to Toomey) conservative could be appointed to fulfill Specter's term. Santorum, young in his mid forties, becomes the senior Senator from Pennsylvania...all of the conservative ducks would be in a row, and in '08 no funny vote rigging in the easter part of the commonwealth. Pennsylvania would then be a red state...

See, you wouldn't know all that being out there in paradise...

86 posted on 11/07/2004 4:07:49 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (FreeMartha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: infidel29
I and many of us here would have supported Toomey, but Specter didn`t win his seat back by THAT much over a guy I can`t remember.

Specter had trouble because a significant portion of PA Republicans washed their hands of him years ago! I myself voted Libertarian (Betsy Summers). Toomey could have beaten Hoeffel--with difficulty, I admit--because that missing portion would have turned out strongly for Toomey. Remember, Santorum wins comfortably in PA. Furthermore, Toomey would have had much better name recognition than Hoeffel. He could have pulled it out.

87 posted on 11/07/2004 4:09:08 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

Good analysis. If Toomey runs for guv, I'll be sure to send a few bucks his way.


88 posted on 11/07/2004 4:09:18 PM PST by sitetest (Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Yes. The base should just shut the hell up until the Senate is full of Chafees, Snowes, and Specters. Let's do away with primaries too. Let's just do away with primaries as well and just automatically elect the most liberal republican candidate.


89 posted on 11/07/2004 4:10:19 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: infidel29

"To say Santorum should go down because of his support of Specter is stoopid."

-- No, "Stoopid" is stupid.


90 posted on 11/07/2004 4:11:17 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
On NRO's The Corner last week, they were already speculating that a relatively low conservative turnout in PA this year may have been a result of Specter, and that Santorum may feel the brunt of a disenchanted base in 2006.

Santorum's base in Pennsylvania have always supported him, and will continue to.

You're a nut, you know it? How many people have to tell you that?

91 posted on 11/07/2004 4:12:06 PM PST by sinkspur ("It is a great day to be alive. I appreciate your gratitude." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
"The base should just shut the hell up until..."

Hate to break this to you sparky but you and Salami there aren't the base. Far from it.

92 posted on 11/07/2004 4:12:44 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Conservatives are not there to agree with you on every issue.

No one appointed you king or god.

"My way or the Highway" thinking is stupid.


93 posted on 11/07/2004 4:13:06 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Great. Name calling. Are the writers at National Review "nuts" too?


94 posted on 11/07/2004 4:13:40 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

I won't be boycotting Santorum. Specter maybe, but not Santorum.


95 posted on 11/07/2004 4:14:10 PM PST by Jim Robinson (No more obstructionist Senate! Sixty in 06!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
On NRO's The Corner last week, they were already speculating that a relatively low conservative turnout in PA this year may have been a result of Specter, and that Santorum may feel the brunt of a disenchanted base in 2006.

Somebody at NRO has done a few rocks of crack...there was a HUGE (or hugh by FR standards) turnout in PA...in the 't'...the northern tier, and the central portion of the Commonwealth (excluding the Pittsburgh and Philly metro areas). Look at the map of PA...almost the whole state is red, except for a few counties in the metro areas. If not for the 5-1, 400,000 vote lead out of Philadelphia County, Bush would have won PA. Whoever posted that on the Corner, is waaaay off base with Pennsylvania.

96 posted on 11/07/2004 4:14:11 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (FreeMartha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

I voted for Clymer.


97 posted on 11/07/2004 4:15:16 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (FreeMartha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
I say bocott him regardless.

What's the good/use of electing a man who touts is principles as often as Rick if, when it really mattered, he looked the other way?

If he faces Ed Rendell in two years, he's toast anyways, so what's the difference?

98 posted on 11/07/2004 4:15:36 PM PST by LincolnLover (Now comes the revolution. If you don't implement a conservative agenda now, when do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
IF ARLEN SPECTER NEVER "BORKED BORK", ROE v. WADE WOULD HAVE BEEN OVERTURNED IN 1992. The man appointed instead of Bork, Kennedy, was the deciding vote in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992. Do you want it to happen again???

Look, it's a waste of breath to remind Pennsylvania Freepers that Specter is bad news. In fact, it's damned presumptuous of you. Nobody here disagrees.

But what really stinks up the scrapple is your jack-stupid plan to threaten Rick Santorum, of all patriots, for the sake of a demand that he can't satisfy.

Go away.

99 posted on 11/07/2004 4:16:22 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

So the base of the party is made up of those who won't hold leadership acocuntable?


100 posted on 11/07/2004 4:16:26 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson