Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nj26
Let me explain.

Byrd: His age and Bush's popularity have dropped him from the top ("unopposable") to the second ("safe") tier. But he rolls tons of political pork into the Great Distinguished Senator Robert C. Byrd Memorial State. As President Pro Tempore, he sits just four heartbeats from the Presidency. Problem for the Republicans: a complete dearth of credible conservative candidates. The GOP should begin grooming candidates (plural) now to replace Byrd when he retires (or dies). Without Byrd on the ballot, this seat blows wide open. Other groomed Republican candidates can challenge Jay Rockefeller and take other state offices.

Clinton: This New York senator is considered vulnerable primarily because she ran behind Al Gore in 2000. Bush also performed better here in 2004 than in 2000. That even excludes the "star" candidacy of Guiliani, who remains enormously popular in New York City. Yeah, Guiliani did hurt himself by campaigning for Bush, but he only has to do a little better than Lazio. That's really quite easy, even if he has just half of his support remaining in the City of New York. And remember: Gore and Kerry--no presidential candidates--will be on the ballot to provide coattails.

Conrad: Should be vulnerable. But if the Republicans had a hand to play, why didn't they fare any better against Byron Dorgan? Where is the "good candidate" that North Dakota so desperately needs? Completely absent--unless the Governor John Hoeven, or another popular Republican, will contest this seat. It shouldn't be difficult--but why hasn't it happened yet? When--and more importantly, if--such a candidate should appear, we can reassess the vulnerability.

Lieberman: Note the assumptions that I've made. He (1) wins his primary easily and (2) doesn't face a significant minor-party insurgency. If both assumptions apply--granted, a big "if"--then how could a conservative beat him? Even if a Greenie splits the liberal vote, it would be interesting, but Lieberman is centrist and incumbent enough to block a conservative Republican. If he doesn't win his primary--or doesn't run, having been appointed, perhaps, Ambassador to Israel--then it's an open seat. Democrats would have a natural edge, but if Republicans could find a credible centrist candidate, they could capture this seat.
82 posted on 11/06/2004 4:18:28 PM PST by dufekin (President Kerry would have our enemies partying like it's 1969, when Kerry first committed treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: dufekin

The more I think about it, the less likely Rudy will run against Hitlery. If he loses, it's over. If he wins, is he gonna run for president right away?

No, if we are going to beat Senator Pantsuit, we will have to run someone else...like a fireman from the WTC..how bout that?


83 posted on 11/06/2004 4:23:25 PM PST by Keith (NOW, MORE THAN EVER....IT'S ABOUT THE JUDGES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson