Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I suggest that all take a look at this article. Not that it proves anything NEW, but merely reinforces the already obvious.

We very lucky that KERRY imploded.......and W saved the day!

1 posted on 11/06/2004 8:02:24 AM PST by fastattacksailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fastattacksailor

Wow, we really did dodge a lurch-laced bullet.


2 posted on 11/06/2004 8:07:07 AM PST by aft_lizard (This space waiting for a post election epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

Its time to finish Kerry off once and for all.

For the good of the nation


3 posted on 11/06/2004 8:07:25 AM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

McCain knew it even before Newsweak did.


4 posted on 11/06/2004 8:07:55 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor
Not NewsWeak, not any of the electronic or print media.

NONE

5 posted on 11/06/2004 8:09:20 AM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR POWERS EQUAL TO THE TASKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

I knew Kerry was bad, but this is something else. At least McCain had some priciples.


6 posted on 11/06/2004 8:11:54 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor
The article asks "Why did newsweek sit on the story...."

McCain must have known that if Kerry had won, the promise would have been off the table.

I'm asking, Why didn't McCain tell somebody ? It definitely would have killed Kerry had it come out.

Seems they're all gutless & soul-less.
7 posted on 11/06/2004 8:13:45 AM PST by stylin19a (It's called GOLF because all the other 4 letter words were taken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

It would also be interesting to know if Sen. McCain informed President Bush about the offer.

If the journalist was bound by some sort of agreement, McCain wasn't. I think it was his Duty to inform the President AND the American public. Everyone would have listened and believed him, even the Dem. Dogs. They were chomping at the idea of him being Kerry's running mate...they couldn't have back-peddled after it was obvious they felt a Kerry-McCain ticket was their hope.

Imagine the election stats if this had been known and the increase in Bush's margin of victory.

No mention of McCain's responsibility to report that Kerry was the public has been made. Why is this aspect being missed?

Kerry's desperation - not surprising at all.


12 posted on 11/06/2004 8:28:38 AM PST by CitizenM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

Kind of funny about McCain. I don't think he would have made 3 votes difference for Kerry, had he been the VP choice.


15 posted on 11/06/2004 8:32:56 AM PST by BillyCrockett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor
The OLD MEDIA can not, must not be Trusted ever again!
16 posted on 11/06/2004 8:34:29 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

Just re-inforces my theory that everybody in his party knew he was going to lose except Kerry. Well, maybe Kerry knew he wasn't supposed to win, but decided to double cross the party and go for broke.


18 posted on 11/06/2004 8:39:37 AM PST by Eastbound ("Neither a Scrooge nor a Patsy be")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor
Because the magazine promised the campaigns that anything obtained by this team of journalists during the course of the campaign would go unreported until the election was over.

Promises are promises, but whatever happened to what, under different circumstances, Newsweek and similar publications would herald as "the public's right to know"?

If this was Bush who had suggested such a thing, don't you think the OM would have reported it using their old stand-by "unnamed source"?

20 posted on 11/06/2004 9:03:10 AM PST by jellybean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor
There once was a Demo named Kerry
Who's ethics were weak and airy.
With complete disdain
he courted McCain
Who replied "You are downright scary!"
22 posted on 11/06/2004 9:07:42 AM PST by Rich in Madison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor; JustPiper
This is so incredible. Hello, Pravda...Newsweek Edition.

Makes you wonder how much more of this goes on. Newsweek, CBS, CNN, etc........
24 posted on 11/06/2004 9:12:41 AM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

It confirms what we've known all along. Kerry wanted the power and prestige of the presidency to fulfill his ambition. It had nothing to do with America or Americans and how to better our country. There was no principle which couldn't be changed, there were no core values that couldn't be nuanced. The man married a billion dollars, he sure wasn't doing it for the money. Poor Mr. JFK wanted to go into the history books and he still may play a prominent role when the story of Bush is told, we all remember Benedict Arnold too.


27 posted on 11/06/2004 9:29:39 AM PST by tiki (Won one against the Flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

By now, everyone should know the MSM is a bunch of pimps and whores for the democrat party.


29 posted on 11/06/2004 10:28:58 AM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

Okay, to be fair to Newsweek....this is done every election cycle. A few reporters are allowed to be embedded with the campaign in essence. The deal: None of the material is published until after the election. If this weren't the deal, or if the idiots in the press didn't keep their word, no campaign would allow them to come along. They certainly would never be privy to the candid moments that could potentially embarass the candidates.


31 posted on 11/06/2004 10:32:39 AM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor
Newsweek is CNN all over again when Mr. Jordan revealed they did not reported when Saddam Hussein's Sons in Law would be killed!!!
34 posted on 11/06/2004 12:08:38 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fastattacksailor

Well, I guess that explains why NEWSWEEK didn't report it, but not why noone else did. No way Newsweek had sole knowledge.

35 posted on 11/06/2004 12:17:56 PM PST by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson