Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Which Dem Senators should we target for defeat in 2006? (Vanity)
11/06/2004 | Deaconjim

Posted on 11/06/2004 3:54:21 AM PST by deaconjim

Ok, we've got two years. We know we need to pick up at least 6 seats. Assuming that we won't have a 100% success rate, we should probably choose at least 8-10 Democrat (or independent) seats to work on.

We have seen that we can make a difference in the outcome of elections. Let's put ourselves to work and help get W a fillabuster proof Senate.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; democrats; elections; hildabeast; hitlery; senate; strategy; tpd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-252 next last
To: deaconjim

When is Diane Fienstein up for re-election?

I would really like to see her go, but that is wishful thinking.


161 posted on 11/06/2004 9:57:54 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FauxBlonde
As for Hillary, I'd be genuinely surprised if she's get a Dem nomination. She's WAY too controversial. Too many people hate her guts.

That's because you have sense and don't see the world through the eyes of a liberal. They're not too rational. I'm reminded of a conversation I overheard after Bush #41 beat Michael Dukakis. I can't believe Bush won! I don't know anybody who voted for Bush!!! They see only their own worldview. Everybody who doesn't believe as they believe is an extremeist, on the face of it.

162 posted on 11/06/2004 10:07:22 PM PST by ExSoldier (When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Fireone

Helping Franken win the dems nomination should be all that is required to ensuring a Republican gets elected. I think I'd give him money for his primary race. Let's not forget that the dems have been moving dramatically left since 1992 and it has only helped the GOP at every level of political office throughout the U.S. ever since!

I am also very much in favor of Howard Dean being the new DNC Chairman, Keeping Pelosi as the HR Minority Leader and getting Hitlery or Teddy K as Senate Minority Leader. :)


163 posted on 11/06/2004 10:21:51 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast ("....to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

I wasn't insinuating ignorance. I was pointing out something I felt bizarre and callous. I also think it seems awfully sneaky to intentionally pull something like that, kind of a bait and switch. What if Kerry had won and Edwards "retired" shortly thereafter because of his wife, and then Kerry appointed HILLARY as VP? That would go over like a lead balloon.

Rice is still young enough to run as a VP in 2008, and just might. I don't see the hurry.

As for my eyerolling...I don't think my membership date or post number should hold me back from speaking my mind. Are you not allowed to criticize those who have been here longer than you?


164 posted on 11/06/2004 10:24:34 PM PST by FauxBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

No she isn't.

I refuse to let you take credit for the dumbest Senate member when she is right here in Washington!

Patty Murray IS the dumbest Senator! Without Question!


165 posted on 11/06/2004 10:25:36 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast ("....to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 7mmMag@LeftCoast

Maybe before we dispose of the moderates in the party we should get the Dems... Its better to have somone who will vote with you 50% of the time than 0%...


166 posted on 11/06/2004 10:27:32 PM PST by NYURepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: FauxBlonde
Are you not allowed to criticize those who have been here longer than you?

No rule on it. I'm just polite enough not to do so. I get a little brusk with newcomers who go galloping around the site jumping in with both feet....

What if Kerry had won and Edwards "retired" shortly thereafter because of his wife, and then Kerry appointed HILLARY as VP?

Only if they controlled the Congress, which they don't. That's why politics is a blood sport, worthy of the Roman Empire and the duel of gladiators.

Rice is still young enough to run as a VP in 2008, and just might.

Actually, my dream ticket in 2008 would be Jeb Bush and Condi Rice. But I don't think that's going to fly. At least not according to the Book of Jeb.

167 posted on 11/06/2004 10:37:23 PM PST by ExSoldier (When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

Target FEINSTEIN!!! But, we need a strong candidate (for a change!).


168 posted on 11/06/2004 10:38:53 PM PST by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, aka The Hildebeast, Spawn of Satan, Hitlery...


169 posted on 11/06/2004 10:42:42 PM PST by DaiHuy (Jesus is Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay

I liked her until the past few nights I saw her on FNC. She said "We should reach out to the Democrats."


I believe she meant to say "We should reach out to (slap) the democrats (often)".


170 posted on 11/06/2004 10:46:21 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast ("....to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: NYURepublican

You have a valid point. As much as we might want to purge our ranks of RINO's we still have some leverage over them and they usually vote more in line with our view's than the Teddy's, Hillary's and Daschle's of the DNC.

We should prioritize the targets by vunerability and whether we can orchestrate any leverage on those in dems in strong Bush states. Which it seems what most of the thought out posts I've read are stating. I would not waste money defending RINO seats though. I would spend it on taking down our prime targets.

Even in a worse case scenario we should lose no more than 3 seats and should pick up at least two (net minus 1). Though I think if we plan it right and run the Marriage Amendemnt in several key states and target weak dems in Bush or Weak Blue states, then we could pick up 3 to 6 depending on where the economy is at in 2006.

An Early prediction says we pick up at least 2 seats in the Senate, with a potential of 4 or 5 max.


171 posted on 11/06/2004 11:09:23 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast ("....to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

Mark Dayton MN. He is a hugh loony. Senator RUN-A-WAY. If the Dims run him we should be able to pick him off.


172 posted on 11/06/2004 11:10:24 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We got the mandate, now let's GOVERN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fireone

Al Franken announced on Letterman last night that he is running in '06 in Minnesota.
We must do everything possible to prevent that left of liberal nutjob from gaining office!



Al Fraken couldn't get elected Dog Catcher.


173 posted on 11/06/2004 11:12:43 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We got the mandate, now let's GOVERN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

All of'em damnit!


174 posted on 11/06/2004 11:23:17 PM PST by Atchafalaya (When you're there, thats the best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
How about targeting anyone, regardless of party label, who does not STRICTLY adhere to the Constitution for the United States, without considering it a "living" document... or is it OK to exempt Pubbies who wipe their butts with it?

Kind of curious. Give me three names of current political figures that meet your criteria?


How about we focus of effectiveness rather then ideological purity? Governing requires compromises. We are not going to get 100% of what we want. But it is a heck of a lot better to have a Govt that LISTENS to us and works with us then one that will ignore us and give us 100% of what we loath. It is a heck of a lot more important that we GOVERN then we stand in the corner and throw temper tantrums because we don't get 100% of what we want.
175 posted on 11/06/2004 11:23:35 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We got the mandate, now let's GOVERN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: BB2

Add to that an electric bill to show proof of residence, and perhaps a thumb print.


176 posted on 11/06/2004 11:27:01 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

O.k., we've discussed quite a few names. Remembering that the goal is to flip seats from Dem to us, and NOT to get rid of a perticularly irritating Senator, let's pick the top 10 and explore their vulnerabilities.


177 posted on 11/07/2004 3:51:19 AM PST by deaconjim (Freeper formally known as jpw01 (Freep the world!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

I choose E, of course, but I'm hoping that we could give a few of them some extra special attention. Obviously, we can't get them all, and some are so safe as to not warrant as much attention as others. We should be able to target those who are weak for one reason or the other, though.


178 posted on 11/07/2004 3:59:18 AM PST by deaconjim (Freeper formally known as jpw01 (Freep the world!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
What's the deal with all of this hype over Rice for President? What would make her such a great President? What would make someone who hasn't won an election in her life capable of winning the Presidency? I am aware of exactly two Presidents who had never previously won any election: Hoover and Eisenhauer.

Hoover was from the smoky back room days and was running when any Republican with a pulse could have won. And while he may have been a capable manager (the Depression certainly wasn't his fault, and his proposed policies for dealing with it were good ones), he was no politician, and was incapable of politically handling the fall-out from the Great Depression. Then, things were handed to FDR, who destroyed our balanced government, created the concept of the activist Supreme Court, and created the welfare state Leviathan we live with today.

Eisenhauer was a one-man celebrity army, having led the troops in the most massive war the earth had seen. We have no one who is even in the same universe as him.

If Rice wants a political future, she should serve out her cabinet time, run for elective office in her home state (where is that?), and then see what happens.

179 posted on 11/07/2004 7:08:41 AM PST by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)

Rudy vs. Hillary

Let's knock out SD Senator Tim Johnson and go 2-for-2.


180 posted on 11/07/2004 8:14:35 AM PST by RockinRight (Bush's rallies look like World Series games. Kerry's rallies look like Little League games.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson