Skip to comments.
NEWSWEEK'S DERELICTION OF DUTY
New York Post ^
| 11/06/04
Posted on 11/05/2004 10:38:10 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
11/05/2004 10:38:11 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
No anymore, in any of the MSM.
2
posted on
11/05/2004 10:39:46 PM PST
by
clee1
(Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
To: kattracks
We've known for some time that the news media does not report the news -- the exude an agenda.
3
posted on
11/05/2004 10:40:46 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(The Democrat Party is pining for the fjords.)
To: kattracks
Even worse, stories like this would never have been reported had Kerry won.
4
posted on
11/05/2004 10:40:49 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(1969'ers telling us how to run our government are like 1929'ers telling us how to land on the moon.)
To: kattracks
The truth about Kerry's proposal to McCain would have caused Kerry to drop like a rock in the polls. This is why Newsweak did not report it. They wanted a horse race.
5
posted on
11/05/2004 10:42:36 PM PST
by
what's up
To: JennysCool
LOL. I guess I'm twisted. This is EXACTLY the kind of thing I'd expect them to publish the morning after Kerry had won... to rub it in our faces just who we elected.
6
posted on
11/05/2004 10:44:21 PM PST
by
cgk
(The Left was beaten by Pres Bush twice & will never have another shot at him... who's dumb?)
To: kattracks
You are correct about the depths that Kerry would lower himself in order to win the Presidency.
But as Evan Thomas pointed out at the start of his article, Newsweek promised BOTH Kerry and Bush that none of the notes they took (during the span of the election) would be posted until after Election Day.
To Newsweek's rare credit, they upheld their end of the bargain.
Anyway, I believe that the Bush-Cheney campaign knew about the offer to McCain but didn't figure they could gain any political traction and chose not to use it.
7
posted on
11/05/2004 10:44:48 PM PST
by
MplsSteve
To: kattracks
They would have done the same thing had President Bush lost; immediately publish a behind the scenes look at how he and his staff prayed, cared about people, were respectful...all those disgusting conservative things.
To: kattracks
These things are minor compared to MSM's giving credence to al-qaqa story to help kerry, while playing down OBL tape to protect kerry.
To: kattracks
Not at all surprising that Newspeak kept all this under wraps until after the election after we heard their editor Evan Thomas say months ago that the media wanted Kerry to win and were going to try to get him an extra fifteen points in the polls with their coverage - apparently they followed through on their plan, since recent studies show that stories on Kerry were about seventy-five percent positive while coverage of Bush was only about thirty percent positive - the big question now is, who will believe a word the magazine and the likes of Thomas tell us in the future (and why should we even buy their rag at all).......
To: kattracks
I strongly feel that if Rice Butt had been elected, this whole expose' would have been SCUTTLED. STAT.
11
posted on
11/05/2004 10:52:52 PM PST
by
Miss Behave
(Thermos Kerry: "You want hot? I'm FOR it. You want cold? I'm FOR it. It's my Secret Plan.")
To: kattracks
Even if we assume that the agreement that was in place between Newsweek and the two campaigns was not in place, the basic premise of this article is absolutely wrong -- for a reason that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere. If Newsweek magazine had an obligation to inform the public about John Kerry's outlandish offer to John McCain, then John McCain himself had an even greater obligation to report this -- since it serves as strong evidence that Mr. Kerry is something of a loony-tune and therefore had no business running for a position as sensitive as the President of the United States.
12
posted on
11/05/2004 10:55:22 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
To: kattracks
It will be amazing if the Old Media have any credibility with the masses after all this
13
posted on
11/05/2004 10:58:41 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Congratulations Bush on your re-election VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: JennysCool
They had a book planned about it, NEWSWEEK, Evan Thomas. They planned to rub it in.
14
posted on
11/05/2004 10:59:46 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Congratulations Bush on your re-election VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: cgk
15
posted on
11/05/2004 10:59:58 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Congratulations Bush on your re-election VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: My2Cents
We've known for some time that the news media does not report the news -- they exude an agenda. You're too kind. I'd have to say they excrete an agenda.
16
posted on
11/05/2004 11:00:18 PM PST
by
AZLiberty
(Proud to be an infidel.)
To: Alberta's Child
If Newsweek magazine had an obligation to inform the public about John Kerry's outlandish offer to John McCain, then John McCain himself had an even greater obligation to report this -- since it serves as strong evidence that Mr. Kerry is something of a loony-tune and therefore had no business running for a position as sensitive as the President of the United States. I can agree that McInsane had an obligation to be forthcoming if such an offer was made but given the fact that he is more of a "looney-tune" than lowlife Kerry combined the fact that he has all the scruples of a DemoRat, there is no way that McInsane would do the right thing.
17
posted on
11/05/2004 11:04:20 PM PST
by
Ophiucus
To: kattracks
It was disgusting the watch the media creating scenarios prior to the election. They manipulated polls, didn't even attempt to hide their blatant agenda favoring Kerry and started talking about lawyers and courts weeks before the election was held.
It must be quite disheartening for them to have gone to all of that trouble and we were still able to see though their smoke and mirrors. they were unable to get their candidate elected.
The media does not have quite the power it thought it did.
18
posted on
11/05/2004 11:12:39 PM PST
by
Allegra
(FOUR MORE YEARS!! WOOOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!)
To: Miss Behave
Rice Butt I'm still laughing. Thanks.
To: kattracks
This is EXACTLY what I was thinking! Shame on them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson