Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saskatchewan to allow same-sex marriages
Globe and Mail ^ | Nov 5, 2004 | Darren Yourk

Posted on 11/05/2004 2:37:42 PM PST by Ahriman

Saskatchewan has become the seventh Canadian jurisdiction to allow same-sex marriages.

Madam Justice Donna Wilson of the Court of Queen's Bench ruled Friday that the traditional definition of marriage, as it currently exists, discriminates against gay and lesbian couples.

Five couples who were denied marriage licences because they were not of the opposite sex filed a statement of claim seeking a declaratory judgment that the common-law definition of marriage be changed.

The group wanted the definition changed to read "two people to the exclusion of others," rather than "two people of the opposite sex."

"The judge found that it is unconstitutional to exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage and changed the law to include them," said Greg Walen of Saskatoon law firm Scharfstein Gibbings Walen & Fisher, who represents the couples. "The judge agreed with the Ontario Court of Appeal that 'the dignity of persons in same-sex relationships is violated by the exclusion of same-sex couples from the institution of marriage.'"


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; andrewsullivanlist; canada; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; same; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Alberta's Child

Somebody already made the Segway Personal Mobility machine. :P


21 posted on 11/05/2004 2:57:26 PM PST by nhoward14 (Freedom costs a buck-o-five.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ahriman

It seems like the only idea that liberals have anymore is hitching up gay couples.


22 posted on 11/05/2004 2:57:45 PM PST by Jim_Curtis (Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahriman

Does the "traditional" definition of marriage discriminate against single people? I'm feeling left out.


23 posted on 11/05/2004 2:59:50 PM PST by AmishDude (President Bush got 51 percent of the vote, a figure higher than that of any Democrat in 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahriman
AND here is the first two to apply for a marriage lisence. they make such a perfect couple :-)
24 posted on 11/05/2004 3:08:00 PM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahriman
The real, and most dangerous, problem here is that the good judge has denied majority rule or sentiment on the basis of her own beliefs and desires.

The biggest difference between a conservative and a liberal is not this or that social issue, but whether they actually believe and accept majority rule. Accepting majority rule means adhering to what a representative republic concludes on the basis of votes. Liberals, and RATS in general, prefer the rule by the wise and few -- philosopher kings with judicial robes.

25 posted on 11/05/2004 4:35:20 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

possible story for your homosexual agenda ping list


26 posted on 11/05/2004 8:08:13 PM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Saskatchewan.

The most damning thing you can say about Saskatchewan is that they travel in droves down to Eastern Montana for the shopping and excitement.

27 posted on 11/05/2004 8:10:34 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
...his 30 wives?

Man... that would surely drive an man insane, if not kill him... 30 wives. Yap... yap... yap... yap... yap... (30 times over)

28 posted on 11/05/2004 8:15:43 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ahriman

Another reason why American liberals need to immigrate north!


29 posted on 11/05/2004 8:17:29 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
Thanks for the ping!

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
Homosexual Keyword Search

Let me know if you want on or off the homosexual agenda ping list.

30 posted on 11/05/2004 8:21:44 PM PST by scripter (Tens of thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahriman

Canada keeps doing things that will make it more and more difficult for us to agree to admit them as our 51st state.


31 posted on 11/05/2004 8:35:09 PM PST by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF

The Canadian courts are appointed by the federal government. An appeal on the matter is currently pending with the Supreme Court Of Canada. There are two options: Parliament can pass a constitutional amendment and Provincial Parliaments can exercise a "notwithstanding" clause to opt out of the ruling. None have currently done so.


32 posted on 11/05/2004 8:39:23 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Imagine him locked up inside a two room cabin in the woods in Saskatchewan during that long, hard, cold, bitter, miserable, nasty Canadian winter!

A fit punishment for any judge, eh?!

33 posted on 11/06/2004 6:16:07 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson